Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) have been utilized for two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging of vascular microanatomy. Image quality and the spatial accuracy of multidimensional reconstructions, however, can be degraded due to artifacts resulting from relative motion between the intracoronary catheter and the vessel wall. To track the relative motion of a catheter with regard to the vessel, a motion tracking system was incorporated with a standard OFDI system by using wavelength division multiplexing techniques. Motion of the vessel was acquired by a frequency shift of the backscattered light caused by the Doppler effect. A single monochromatic beam was utilized for tracking the relative longitudinal displacements of a catheter-based fiber probe with regard to the vessel. Although two tracking beams are, in general, required to correct for longitudinal motion artifacts, the accurate reconstruction in a longitudinal view was achieved by the Doppler frequency information of a single beam. Our results demonstrate that the single beam based motion tracking scheme is a cost-effective, practical approach to compensating for longitudinal distortions due to cardiac dynamics, thus leading to accurate quantitative analysis of 3D intracoronary OFDI.
Motion artifacts Image compensation OCT OFDI
Optical coherence tomography
Optical frequency domain imaging
This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grants R33 CA125560 and R01 HL076398), and Terumo Medical Corporation.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript are inventors on patents owned by MGH and licensed to Terumo Corporation and therefore may share in licensing income.
Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W et al (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang IK, Bouma BE, Kang DH, Park SJ, Park SW, Seung HK et al (2002) Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(4):604–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yun SH, Tearney GJ, de Boer JF, Iftimia N, Bouma BE (2003) High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging. Opt Express 11:2953–2963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choma MA, Sarunic MV, Yang C, Izatt JA (2003) Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 11:2183–2189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yun SH, Tearney GJ, Vakoc BJ, Shishkov M, Oh WY, Desjardins AE et al (2006) Comprehensive volumetric optical microscopy in vivo. Nat Med 12:1429–1433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tearney GJ, Waxman S, Shishkov M, Vakoc BJ, Suter MJ, Freilich MI et al (2008) Three-dimensional coronary artery microscopy by intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:752–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takarada S, Imanishi T, Liu Y, Ikejima H, Tsujioka H, Kuroi A et al (2010) Advantage of next-generation frequency-domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time-domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:202–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman S, Freilich MI, Suter MJ, Shishkov M, Bilazarian S, Virmani R et al (2010) A case of lipid core plaque progression and rupture at the edge of a coronary stent: elucidating the mechanisms of DES failure. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:193–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha JY, Shishkov M, Colice M, Oh WY, Yoo H, Liu L et al (2010) Compensation of motion artifacts in catheter-based optical frequency domain imaging. Opt Express 18:11418–11427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar