Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality
- 258 Downloads
To evaluate the effective radiation dose and image quality resulting from use of 100 vs. 120 kV among patients referred for cardiac dual source CT exam (DSCT). Prospective data was collected on 294 consecutive patients referred for DSCT. For each scan, a physician specializing in cardiac CT chose all parameters including tube current and voltage, axial versus helical acquisition, and use of tube current modulation. Lower tube voltage was selected for thinner patients or when lower radiation was desired for younger patients, particularly females. For each study, image quality (IQ) was rated on a subjective IQ score and contrast (CNR) and signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios were calculated. Tube voltage of 100 kV was used for 77 (26%) exams while 120 kV was used for 217 (74%) exams. Use of 100 kV was more common in thinner patients (weight 166lbs vs. 199lbs, P < .001). The effective radiation dose for the 100 and 120 kV scans was 8.5 and 15.4 mSv respectively. Among scans utilizing 100 and 120 kV, there was no difference in exam indication, use of beta blockers, heart rate, scan length and use of radiation saving techniques such as prospective ECG triggering and tube current modulation. The IQ score was significantly higher for 100 kV scans. While 100 kV scans were found to have higher image noise then those utilizing 120 kV, the contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise were significantly higher (SNR: 9.4 vs. 8.3, P = .02; CNR: 6.9 vs. 6.0, P = .02). In selected non-obese patients, use of low kV results in a substantial reduction of radiation dose and may result in improved image quality. These results suggest that low kV should be used more frequently in non-obese patients.
KeywordsCardiac CT Radiation dose Tube voltage
Drs. Blankstein and Rogers received support from NIH grant 1T32 HL076136-02.
Conflict of interest
- 1.Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, Hundley WG, Manning WJ, Printz BF, Stuber M, Woodard PK (2008) Noninvasive coronary artery imaging. Magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography. A scientific statement from the American heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. CirculationGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, Kastrati A, Schomig A (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113(10):1305–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Feuchtner GM, Jodocy D, Klauser A, Haberfellner B, Aglan I, Spoeck A, Hiehs S, Soegner P, Jaschke W (2009) Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kv tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. Eur J Radiol. doi: S0720-048X(09)00417-3[pii]10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.012
- 10.Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Baumuller S, Plass A, Genoni M, Marincek B, Leschka S (2008) Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source ct: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters. Eur J Radiol 68(3):385–391. doi: S0720-048X(08)00495-6[pii]10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar