How reliable are 40 MHz IVUS and 64-slice MDCT in characterizing coronary plaque composition? An ex vivo study with histopathological comparison
- 114 Downloads
The present study investigated whether IVUS could serve as a reliable reference in validating MDCT characterization of coronary plaque against a histological gold standard. Twenty-one specimens were postmortem human coronary arteries. Coronary cross-sections were imaged by 40 MHz IVUS and by 64-slice MDCT and characterized histologically as presenting calcified, fibrous or lipid-rich plaques. Plaque composition was analyzed visually and intra-plaque MDCT attenuation was measured in Hounsfield Units (HU). 83 atherosclerotic plaques were identified. IVUS failed to characterize calcified plaque accurately, with a positive predictive value (ppv) of 75% versus 100% for MDCT. Lipid-rich plaque was even less accurately characterized, with ppv of 60 and 68% for IVUS and MDCT respectively. Mean MDCT attenuation was 966 ± 473 HU for calcified plaque, 83 ± 35 HU for fibrous plaque and 70.92 HU ± 41 HU for lipid-rich plaque. No significant difference in mean MDCT attenuation was found between fibrous and lipid-rich plaques (P = 0.276). In vivo validation of MDCT against an IVUS reference thus appears to be an unsuitable and unreliable approach: 40 MHz IVUS suffers from acoustic ambiguities in plaque characterization, and 64-slice MDCT fails to analyze plaque morphology and components accurately.
KeywordsAtherosclerosis Intravascular ultrasound Multidetector computed tomography
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest exists regarding this manuscript.
- 3.Glaglov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins C et al (1987) Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Eng J Med. 316:1371–1375Google Scholar
- 4.Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD et al (2001) American college of cardiology clinical expert consensus on standards for acquisition, measurements and reporting of intravascular studies. A report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus document. JACC 37–5:1478–1492Google Scholar
- 5.Se Nissen, Gurley CL, Grnies CL et al (1991) Intravascular assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 84:1087–1099Google Scholar