Variability of carotid artery measurements on 3-Tesla MRI and its impact on sample size calculation for clinical research
- 117 Downloads
Carotid MRI measurements are increasingly being employed in research studies for atherosclerosis imaging. The majority of carotid imaging studies use 1.5 T MRI. Our objective was to investigate intra-observer and inter-observer variability in carotid measurements using high resolution 3 T MRI. We performed 3 T carotid MRI on 10 patients (age 56 ± 8 years, 7 male) with atherosclerosis risk factors and ultrasound intima-media thickness ≥0.6 mm. A total of 20 transverse images of both right and left carotid arteries were acquired using T2 weighted black-blood sequence. The lumen and outer wall of the common carotid and internal carotid arteries were manually traced; vessel wall area, vessel wall volume, and average wall thickness measurements were then assessed for intra-observer and inter-observer variability. Pearson and intraclass correlations were used in these assessments, along with Bland-Altman plots. For inter-observer variability, Pearson correlations ranged from 0.936 to 0.996 and intraclass correlations from 0.927 to 0.991. For intra-observer variability, Pearson correlations ranged from 0.934 to 0.954 and intraclass correlations from 0.831 to 0.948. Calculations showed that inter-observer variability and other sources of error would inflate sample size requirements for a clinical trial by no more than 7.9%, indicating that 3 T MRI is nearly optimal in this respect. In patients with subclinical atherosclerosis, 3 T carotid MRI measurements are highly reproducible and have important implications for clinical trial design.
Keywords3 Tesla MRI Carotid artery Reproducibility
- 2.Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS et al (2004) Differentiation of intraplaque versus juxtaluminal hemorrhage/thrombus in advanced human carotid atherosclerotic lesions by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 110:3239–3244. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000147287.23741.9A PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Corti R, Fuster V, Fayad ZA et al (2005) Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:106–112. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.054 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JCC et al (2002) Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 90:29–34. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02381-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Stensland-Bugge E, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O (1997) Reproducibility of ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness is dependent on arterial wall thickness. Stroke 26:1972–1980Google Scholar