Advertisement

Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology

  • Arthur E. Stillman
  • Matthijs Oudkerk
  • Margaret Ackerman
  • Christoph R. Becker
  • Pawel E. Buszman
  • Pim J. de Feyter
  • Udo Hoffmann
  • Matthew T. Keadey
  • Riccardo Marano
  • Martin J. Lipton
  • Gilbert L. Raff
  • Gautham P. Reddy
  • Michael R. Rees
  • Geoffrey D. Rubin
  • U. Joseph Schoepf
  • Giuseppe Tarulli
  • Edwin J. R. van Beek
  • Lewis Wexler
  • Charles S. White
Original paper

Preamble

The diagnosis of patients with acute chest pain remains a challenging problem. There are approximately 6 million chest pain related emergency department (ED) visits annually in the US alone [1]. Approximately 5.3% of all ED patients are seen because of chest pain and reported admission rates are between 30% and 72% for these patients [2].

Only 15–25% of patients presenting with acute chest pain are ultimately diagnosed as having an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Of those patients who were admitted to the chest pain unit, 44% ultimately had significant pathology ruled-out in one series [3]. The cost of chest pain triage and management has been estimated to be as high as $8 billion dollars annually with most of those patients ultimately not having ACS [4]. Moreover, 2–8% of patients are discharged from the ED and later diagnosed as having ACS [5, 6, 7, 8]. The mortality rate for these patients is approximately 25%, which is twice as high as those who are admitted [7]....

Keywords

Guidelines Acute chest pain 

References

  1. 1.
    Selker HP, Zalenski RJ, Antman EM et al (1997) An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group. Ann Emerg Med 29(1):13–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Graff LG, Dallara J, Ross MA et al (1997) Impact on the care of the emergency department chest pain patient from the chest pain evaluation registry (CHEPER) study. Am J Cardiol 80(5):563–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pozen MW, D’Agostino RB, Selker HP, Sytkowski PA, Hood WB Jr. (1984) A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. N Engl J Med 310(20):1273–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fineberg HV, Scadden D, Goldman L (1984) Care of patients with a low probability of acute myocardial infarction. Cost effectiveness of alternatives to coronary-care-unit admission. N Engl J Med 310(20):1301–1307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldman L, Cook EF, Johnson PA, Brand DA, Rouan GW, Lee TH (1996) Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to the emergency departments with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 334(23):1498–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee TH, Goldman L (2000) Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 342(16):1187–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC et al (1987) Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 60(4):219–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R et al (2000) Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 342(16):1163–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rusnak RA, Stair TO, Hansen K, Fastow JS (1989) Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 18(10):1029–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(1):147–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16(3):575–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):552–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16(12):2739–2747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS et al (2002) Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 288(21):2693–2700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeudy J, Waite S, White CS (2006) Nontraumatic thoracic emergencies. Radiol Clin North Am 44(2):273–293, ixPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. Jama 284(7):835–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP et al (1998) Low-molecular-weight heparins in non-ST-segment elevation ischemia: the ESSENCE trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin, in non-Q-wave Coronary Events. Am J Cardiol 82(5B):19L–24LPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manoharan G, Adgey AA (2002) Current management of unstable angina: lessons from the TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2(4):237–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mega JL, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS et al (2005) Correlation between the TIMI risk score and high-risk angiographic findings in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: observations from the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) trial. Am Heart J 149(5):846–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Selker HP, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL et al (1998) Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 129(11):845–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanchis J, Bodi V, Llacer A et al (2005) Risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain and normal troponin concentrations. Heart 91(8):1013–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanchis J, Bodi V, Nunez J et al (2005) New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(3):443–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 40(7):1366–1374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz DA, Williams GC, Brown RL et al (2005) Emergency physicians’ fear of malpractice in evaluating patients with possible acute cardiac ischemia. Ann Emerg Med 46(6):525–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al (2006) Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 114(21):2251–2260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Moselewski F et al (2006) MDCT in early triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):1240–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M et al (2005) Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(2):533–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M et al (2000) Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 83(3):416–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khan IA, Nair CK (2002) Clinical, diagnostic, and management perspectives of aortic dissection. Chest 122(1):311–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thoongsuwan N, Stern EJ (2002) Chest CT scanning for clinical suspected thoracic aortic dissection: beware the alternate diagnosis. Emerg Radiol 9(5):257–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F et al (2006) Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-s rotation speed. Invest Radiol 41(5):436–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pannu HK, Alvarez W Jr., Fishman EK (2006) Beta-blockers for cardiac CT: a primer for the radiologist. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6 Suppl 2):S341–S345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A et al (2001) Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(5):1295–1298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Fischbach R et al (2002) Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol 12(6):1532–1540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laudon DA, Vukov LF, Breen JF, Rumberger JA, Wollan PC, Sheedy PF II (1999) Use of electron-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 33(1):15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLaughlin VV, Balogh T, Rich S (1999) Utility of electron beam computed tomography to stratify patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain. Am J Cardiol 84(3):327–328, A328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Georgiou D, Budoff MJ, Kaufer E, Kennedy JM, Lu B, Brundage BH (2001) Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: a follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 38(1):105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, Daviglus M, Rich S, Kondos GT (2001) Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults. Am J Cardiol 87(12):1335–1339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Naghavi M, Falk E, Hecht HS et al (2006) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient–Part III: executive summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force report. Am J Cardiol 98(2A):2H–15HPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Poll LW, Cohnen M, Brachten S, Ewen K, Modder U (2002) Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation (“ECG pulsing”): phantom measurements. Rofo 174(12):1500–1505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26(15):1482–1487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112(15):2318–2323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dorgelo J, Willems TP, Geluk CA, van Ooijen PM, Zijlstra F, Oudkerk M (2005) Multidetector computed tomography-guided treatment strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 15(4):708–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ et al (2005) ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(2):383–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jacobs JE, Boxt LM, Desjardins B, Fishman EK, Larson PA, Schoepf UJ (2006) ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance and Interpretation of Cardiac Computed Tomography (CT). J Am Coll Radiol 3:677–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G et al (2006) Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1848(2):402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rumberger JA (2006) Noncardiac abnormalities in diagnostic cardiac computed tomography: within normal limits or we never looked! J Am Coll Cardiol 48(2):407–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    ACR White Paper on Split Interpretations. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. (2006) Available from: http://www.acr.org/s_acr/doc.asp?CID=2600&DID=24277Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hayter RG, Rhea JT, Small A, Tafazoli FS, Novelline RA (2006) Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency setting. Radiology 238(3):841–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR et al (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354(22):2317–2327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur E. Stillman
    • 1
  • Matthijs Oudkerk
    • 2
  • Margaret Ackerman
    • 3
  • Christoph R. Becker
    • 4
  • Pawel E. Buszman
    • 5
  • Pim J. de Feyter
    • 6
  • Udo Hoffmann
    • 7
    • 8
  • Matthew T. Keadey
    • 9
  • Riccardo Marano
    • 10
  • Martin J. Lipton
    • 11
  • Gilbert L. Raff
    • 12
  • Gautham P. Reddy
    • 13
  • Michael R. Rees
    • 14
  • Geoffrey D. Rubin
    • 15
  • U. Joseph Schoepf
    • 16
  • Giuseppe Tarulli
    • 17
  • Edwin J. R. van Beek
    • 18
  • Lewis Wexler
    • 15
  • Charles S. White
    • 19
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Clinical RadiologyLudwig-Maximilan UniversityMunichGermany
  5. 5.Department of CardiologyUpper Silesian Heart CenterSilesiaPoland
  6. 6.Thoraxcenter, Division of CardiologyUniversity Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt and Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
  7. 7.Department of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  8. 8.Harvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  9. 9.Department of Emergency MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  10. 10.Department of Clinical Sciences and BioimagingSection of Radiology, G. d’Annunzio UniversityChietiItaly
  11. 11.Department of RadiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  12. 12.Department of CardiologyWilliam Beaumont HospitalRoyal OakUSA
  13. 13.Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  14. 14.Department of Clinical RadiologyBristol Royal InfirmaryBristolUK
  15. 15.Department of RadiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  16. 16.Department of RadiologyMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  17. 17.Department of RadiologyHumber River Regional HospitalTorontoCanada
  18. 18.Department of RadiologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  19. 19.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyUniversity of Maryland Medical CenterBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations