Left atrial appendage functions in patients with severe rheumatic mitral regurgitation

  • Atila BitigenEmail author
  • Mustafa Bulut
  • Ali C. Tanalp
  • Cevat Kirma
  • Irfan Barutçu
  • Selcuk Pala
  • Ayhan Erkol
  • Bilal Boztosun
Original Paper



The left atrial appendage (LAA) function was evaluated in patients with severe rheumatic mitral regurgitation, having sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation, by standard and tissue Doppler echocardiographic examinations.

Methods and results

Sixty patients with rheumatic severe mitral regurgitation were enrolled. The patients (14 females and 6 males) having sinus rhythm were selected as group I and 20 patients (15 females and 5 males) with atrial fibrillation formed group II. 20 healthy subjects (15 female and 5 males) served as the control group (group III). In order to determine the LAA functions, LAA peak filling flow velocity (LAAPFV), LAA peak emptying flow velocity (LAAPEV) and percentage of LAA area change (LAAAC %) were measured. In the TDI records of the subjects with sinus rhythm, the first positive wave identical to the LAA late emptying wave (LEW) following the P-wave was accepted as LAA late systolic wave (LSW), and the second negative wave identical to the LAA late filling flow was accepted as late diastolic wave (LDW). In patients with atrial fibrillation, the positive wave was accepted as LAA late systolic wave (LSW), and the second negative wave identical to the LAA late filling flow was accepted as late diastolic wave (LDW). LAA outflow and inflow velocities were lower in the group having atrial fibrillation (P < 0.002, and P < 0.007, respectively). LAAAC% was also reduced in group II (P < 0.0001). The pulsed Doppler LSW and LDW velocities, measured with TDI method were found to be quite reduced in patients with AF (P: 0.002 and P: 0.001, respectively). The study parameters were statistically similar in patients with normal sinus rhythm and controls.


In this study, we found that the LAA functions are impaired in patients with severe mitral regurgitation, having AF, whereas preserved in patients with normal sinus rhythm, compared to controls.


Left atrial appendage functions Atrial fibrillation Sinus rhythm Tissue Doppler 


  1. 1.
    Jordan RA, Scheifly CH, Edwards JE (1951) Mural thrombosis and arterial embolism in mitral stenosis; a clinicopathological study of fifty-one cases. Circulation 3:363–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aberg H (1969) Atrial fibrillation: I. Astudy of atriyal thrombosis and systemic embolism in a necropsy material. Acta Med Scand 185:373–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aschenberg W, Schluter M, Kremer P et al (1986) Transesophageal two-dimensional for the detection of left atrial appendage thrombus. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:163–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jongbloed MR, Bax JJ, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ (2004) Thrombus in the left atrial appendage detected by intracardiac echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:113–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP (1994) Relation between embolic events in left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:961–969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castello R, Puri S (1996) In vivo and in vitro studies on the mechanism and clinical significance of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in patients with atrial arrhytmias. Progress in Cardiovasc Dis 1:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Gentile F et al (2002) Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with left atrial thrombus and sinus rhythm. Experience in 20 643 consecutive transesophageal echocardiographic examinations. Circulation 105:27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Movsowitz C, Movsowitz HD, Jacobs LE, et al (1993) Significant mitral regurgitation is protective against left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thrombus as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 6:107–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hwang JJ, Shyu KG, Hsu KL et al (1994) Significant mitral regurgitation is protective against left atrial spontaneous echo contrast formation but not against systemic embolism. Chest 106:8–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karatasakis GT, Gotsis AC, Cokkinos DV (1995) Influence of mitral regurgitation on left atrial thrombus and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. Am J Cardiol 76:279–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kranidis A, Koulouris S, Filippatos G et al (2000) Mitral regurgitation protects from left atrial thrombogenesis in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1863–1866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henry WL, De Maria A, Gramiak R et al (1980) Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on nomenclature and standards in two dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 62:212–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC et al (1987) Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation 75:175–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall SH, Brickner E, Willett DW et al (1997) Assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta. Circulation 95:636–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Gentile F et al (1999) Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1867–1877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurlertop Y, Yilmaz M, Acikel M, et al (2004) Doppler properties of the left atrial appendage in patients with mitral valve disease. Echocardiography 21:219–234Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blackshear JL, Pearce LA, Asinger RW et al (1993) Mitral regurgitation associated with reduced thromboembolic events in high-risk patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 72:840–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davison G, Greenland P (1991) Predictors of left atrial thrombus in mitral valve disease. J Gen Intern Med 6:108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coulshed N, Epstein EJ, Mc Kendrick CS et al (1970) Systemic embolism in mitral valve disease. Br Heart J 32:26–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davidsen B, Egeblad H, Pietersen A (1989) Thromboembolism in patients with advanced mitral valve prolapsus. J Intern Med 226:433–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ha JW, Lee BK, Kim HJ et al (2001) Assessment of left atrial appendage filling patern by using intravenous administration of microbubbles: comparison between mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14:1100–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leistad D, Christensen G, Ilebekk A (1993) Significance of increased atrial pressure on stroke volume during atrial fibrillation in anaesthetized pigs. Acta Physiol Scand 149:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leistad E, Christensen G, Ilebekk A (1993) Effects of atrial fibrillation on left and right atrial dimensions, pressures, and compliances. Am J Physiol 264:1093–1097Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ito T, Suwa M, Kobashi A (1998) Influence of altered loading conditions on left atrial appendage function ın vivo. Am J Cardiol 81:1056–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoit BD, Shao Y, Gabel M (1994) Influence of acutely altered loading conditions on left atrial appendage flow velocities. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:1117–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trambaiolo P, Salustri A, Tanga M (2002) Assessment of left atrial appendage wall velocities by transesophageal tissue Doppler echocardiography: A clinical study in patients with sinüs rhythm. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:425–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atila Bitigen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mustafa Bulut
    • 1
  • Ali C. Tanalp
    • 1
  • Cevat Kirma
    • 1
  • Irfan Barutçu
    • 1
  • Selcuk Pala
    • 1
  • Ayhan Erkol
    • 1
  • Bilal Boztosun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyKartal Koşuyolu Yüksek Ihtisas Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations