Advertisement

Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 606–614 | Cite as

Research and Application of High-Production Area Seismic Prediction Technology for High-Rank Coalbed Methane Reservoir

  • Liu Turnip
  • Li Xuesone
  • Sun YongheEmail author
  • Li Minghui
  • Du Jingguos
Article
  • 5 Downloads

In order to accurately predict the high-production areas in CBM reservoirs, we identified the main geological factors controlling the CHM production. Based on the statistical analysis data of the geological and production area and seismic prediction methods, the comparative influence of the five main geological factors was studied. The validity of the seismic prediction method was further evaluated. The results show that the production of a GEM well is influenced by the reservoir structure, gas content, permeability, and coal-body structure. The above four geological controlling factors can be accurately evaluated by the seismic attributes. The proposed high-production area seismic prediction method can be applied for accurate localization of the high-production areas. When the high-production evaluation index is lower than 0.2, the daily gas production exceeds 1000 The method can provide an effective instrument for evaluating formation productivity.

Keywords

High-production area high-rank coalbed methane reservoir seismic prediction technology Southern Qinshui Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41572127).

References

  1. 1.
    X. Z. Zhao, Q. Z. Mu, and F. J. Sun, "Practice of coalbed methane exploration and development in Qinshui basin." J. China Coal Soc., 40(9), 2131-2136 (2015).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Q. Z. Zhu, Y. H. Yang, and Y. Q. Zuo, "CBM development in China: challenges and solutions," Nat. Gas Ind., 38(4), 96-100 (2018).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. B. Wu, H. J. Xu, and P. S. Zhang, "Sweet-spot prediction for CBM reservoir based on seismic inversion parameters," Coal Sci. Technol., 46(7), 218-222 (2018).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. H. Shao, C. Y. Liu, and Q. X. Ding, "Prediction of 11#coalbed gas content in Hancheng coalbed methane 3D seismic survey," Geol. Sci. Technol. Inform., 35(1),147-151 (2016).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. M. Qi and S. C. Dung, "Application of seismic multi-attribute fusion method based on D-S evidence theory in prediction of CBM-enriched area," Appl. Geophys., 9(1), 80-86 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. P. Chen, Q. M. Huo. and J. D. Lin, "The inverse correlations between methane content and elastic parameters of coalbed methane reservoirs," Geophysics,78(4), 237 - 248 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. N. Huo, L. G. Xu, and L. H. Shao, "Seismic prediction technologies of CBM sweet spots and their application," Nat. Gas Ind., 34(8), 46-52 (2014).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. F. Du and S. P. Peng, "Coalseam thickness prediction with geostatistics," Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng., 29 (Supp.1), 2762-2767 (2010).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. R. Gregory, "Aspects of rock physics from laboratory and log data that are important to seismic interpretation: Section 1. Foundamentals of straligraphic interpretation of seismic data,"AAPG Memoir 26, Seismic stratigraghy - Application to hydrocarbon exploration, 15-46 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. C. B. Ramos and T. L. Davis, "3D AVO analysis and modeling applied to fracture detection in coalbed methane reservoirs," Geophysics, 62(6),1683-1695 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Ai, M. S. Zhou, and J. Zhang, "Quantitative identification of coal structure based on coal rock brittleness index by logging data," Larhot. Reserv, 29(2), 139-144 (2017).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Z. Zhao, S. Q. Liu, and S. X. Sang, "Characteristics and generation mechanisms of coal nes in coalbed methane wells in the southern Qinshui Basin, China," J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 34, 849-863 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q. J. Hu, H. M. Jia and K. J. Qi, "A fine control method of owing pressure in single-phase ow section of high-rank CBM gas development wells: A case study from the Fanzhuang-Zhengzhuang Block in the Qinshui Basin," Nat. Gas Ind. 38(9), 76-81 (2018).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Y. Wang, J. B. Mang, and J. M. Li, "Enrichment and reservoir laws of the coalbed methane in China," Nat. Gas Ind., 24(5), 11-13 (2004).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Wang. F. Y. Xu, and B. Jiang, "Studies on main factor coupling and its control on coalbed methane accumulation in the Qinshui Basin,"Energ. Explor. Exploit., 31(2), 167-186 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Song. S. B. Liu, and Y. W. Ju, "Coupling between gas content and permeability controlling enrichment zones of high abundance coalbed methane," Acta Pet. Sini, 34(3), 417-426 (2013).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Wang. J. S. Dai, and H. G. Zhang, "Numerical simulation of fractured reservoir stress sensitivity: a case study from Kuqa depression Keshen gas field," Acta Pet. Sini, 35(1), 123-133 (2014).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Q. J. Hu, M. X. Li, and M. P. Qiao, "Analysis of key geologic factors of fracturing effect of CBM wells for high-rank coal in Southern Qinshui Basin," J. China Coal Soc., 42(6), 1506-1516 (2017).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Chen, D.Z. Tang, and H. Xu, "The distribution of coal structure in Hancheng based on well logging data," J. China Coal Soc., 38(8), 1435- 1442 (2013).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Marroquin, "Seismic attribute-based characterization of coalbed methane reservoirs: An example from the Fruitland Formation, San Juan basin. New Mexico," Ame. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 88(11), 1603-1621(2004).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    X. X. Fu, F. Xu, and Q. R. Qin, "Estimation of seismic wave energy attenuation gradient based on Pseudo-Margenau-Hill distribution,"Lirhot Resent. 23(6), 106-110 (2011).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Q. S. Tan, R. R. Zou, and J. Cui, "Research on geophysical comprehensive evaluation method of coalbed methane enrichment region-taking Zhengzhuang region for example," China Coalbed Methane,14(1), 15-20 (2017).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Z. P. Meng, S. S. Liu, and B. Y. Wang, "Study on feature of coal body structure and logging response in Jincheng Mining Area," Coal Sci. Technol., 43(2), 58-63,67 (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liu Turnip
    • 1
  • Li Xuesone
    • 2
  • Sun Yonghe
    • 3
    Email author
  • Li Minghui
    • 4
  • Du Jingguos
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Electrical Information EngineeringNortheast Petroleum UniversityDaqingChina
  2. 2.Exploration and Development Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Co Ltd.DaqingChina
  3. 3.School of Earth ScienceNortheast Petroleum UniversityDaqingChina
  4. 4.Daqing Yushulin Oilfield Development Co. Ltd.Institute of GeologyDaqingChina
  5. 5.College of Mining EngineeringNorth China University of Science and TechnologyTangshanChina

Personalised recommendations