Effect of Unleaded Gasoline—Biofuel Blends on Exhaust Emissions
- 36 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Biodiesels and biomass EtOH are currently considered the most applicable and essential biomass fuels. Furthermore, MeOH and BuOH are also attracting attention as alternatives. These fuel types can be used to reduce exhaust emissions from gasoline engines because they are renewable oxygenated bioresources. Three biofuel additives, namely, MeOH (10%, M10), EtOH (10%, E10), and BuOH (10%, B10) were used to compare the engine performance properties and exhaust gas emission levels upon combustion of mixed biomass fuels and pure petroleum fuel (clean unleaded gasoline, E0). The engine combustion temperature dropped by 4.32%, O2 emission increased by 6.67%, NOx emissions decreased by 13.46%, CO emission decreased by 44%, and hydrocarbon emissions fell by 29% if biomass fuels were used. Therefore, mixed biofuel additives and gasoline could substantially reduce engine exhaust emissions, including oxides of C and N, hydrocarbons, etc., because the biofuels contain higher oxygen contents that facilitate complete combustion.
Keywords
biofuel gasoline engine emissions engine testingReferences
- 1.H. C. Ong, T. M. I. Mahlia, H. H. Masjuki, et al., Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 15, 3501-3515 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.M. Roegiers and B. Zhmud, Lubr. Sci., 21, No. 5, 169-182 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.I. M. Atadashi, M. Aroua, and K. A. Abdul Aziz, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14, 1999-2008 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.K. R. C. Savita, A. K. Saxena, M. S. Negi, et al., Fuel Process. Technol., 88, 303-307 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.B. P. Anand, C. G. Saravanan, and C. A. Srinivasan, Renewable Energy, 35, 1179-1184 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A. S. M. A. Haseeb, S. Y. Sia, M. A. Fazal, et al., Energy, 35, 1460-1464 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.A. S. M. A. Haseeb, M. A. Fazal, M. I. Jahirul, et al., Fuel, 90, 922-931 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. Munoz, F. Moreno, C. Monne, et al., Renewable Energy, 36, 2918-2924 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.S. Pohit, P. K. Biswas, R. Kumar, et al., Energy Policy, 37, 4540-4548 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.S. G. Poulopoulos, D. P. Samaras, and C. J. Philippopoulos, Atmos. Environ., 35, No. 2, 4399-4406 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. K. Pandey, A. Rehman, and R. M. Sarviya, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 16, 1762-1778 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.A. K. Agarwal, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 33, 233-271 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.A. M. Liaquat, M. A. Kalam, H. H. Masjuki, et al., Atmos. Environ., 44, 3869-3877 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A. Zhou and E. Thomson, Appl. Energy, 86, S11-S20 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Biofuels for Transport: An International Perspective, Vol. 9, IEA (International Energy Agency), 9 rue de la Federation, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France, 2004; http://www.iea.org.
- 16.M. G. Kulkarni, A. K. Dalai, and N. N. Bakhshi, Bioresour. Technol., 98, 2027-2033 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M. A. Kalam and H. H. Masjuki, Biomass Bioenergy, 23, 471-479 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.A. Demirbas, Energy Convers. Manage., 50, 14-34 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.S. Puhan, N. Vedaraman, B. V. B. Ram, et al., Biomass Bioenergy, 28, 87-93 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.J, Xue, T. E. Grift, and A. C. Hansen, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 15, 1098-1116 (2011).Google Scholar
- 21.C.-W. Wu, R.-H. Chen, J.-Y. Pu, et al., Atmos. Environ., 38, No. 40, 7093-7100 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.C. L. Song, W. M. Zhang, Y. Q. Pei, et al., Atmos. Environ., 40, No. 11, 1957-1970 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar