Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 436–443 | Cite as

Impact on Diesel Fuel Crystallization of Alkyl-Methacrylate—Maleic-Anhydride—Methacrylamide Terpolymers Used as Cold-Flow Improvers

  • Jilu Chen
  • Tianliang Li
  • Sheng Han
Article
First Online:
  • 34 Downloads

Alkyl-methacrylate—maleic-anhydride—methacrylamide terpolymers (MR1—MA—MCNR2) are some of the most widely used cold flow improvers (CFIs). The crystallization behavior of diesel fuel with added MR1—MA—MCNR2 must be studied in order to develop more efficient terpolymers MC14—MA—MCNR2 was synthesized by the reaction of tetradecyl methacrylate (MC14), maleic anhydride (MA), and methacrylamide (MCNR2). The diesel fuel was filtered in situ at its cold filter plugging point (CFPP) in a manual CFPP apparatus before and after adding MC14—MA—MCNR2. The influence of the amount of polymer additive on the system fluidity was studied. The results showed that the solidification point first decreased to –34°C and then increased sharply to –17°C whereas the CFPP changed from –2 to –5°C and then remained steady as the amount of additive was increased. The crystallization behavior of the diesel fuel was studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The system enthalpy at first decreased as CFI was added to the diesel fuel and then began to increase as the amount of additive was increased further, showing that the liquid—solid phase transition was delayed whereas the crystallization started at a lower temperature than that for the base diesel fuel. The XRD pattern of the CFI confirmed the presence of complex crystalline particles with long-range order. TEM showed that addition of CFIs to diesel fuels caused fine crystals to grow unevenly and bind to each other. The wax crystals had different sizes because of a shortage of crystallization centers and binding of the particles. The CFIs acted through a eutectic mechanism.

Keywords

diesel fuels terpolymer alkyl methacrylate maleic anhydride methacrylamide cold flow improvers cold filter plugging point diesel fuel crystallization solidification point 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was sponsored by the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Project No. 09YZ387). We also thank the R&D center of Petro China Lubricating Oil Co., Lanzhou, China, for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    A. P. Coutinho, F. Mirante, J. C. Ribeiro, et al., Fuel, 81, No. 7, 963-967 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. L. Wang, A. Flamberg, and T. Kikabhai, Hydrocarbon Process., 78, No. 2, 59-62 (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Chanda, A. Sarmah, A. Borthakur, et al., Fuel, 77, No. 11, 1163-1167 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Morduchowitz and J. J. Bialy, US Pat. No. 4,022,590, May 10, 1977, “Low pour waxy residual fuel oils.”Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. H. van der Meij and R. H. Bloembergen, US Pat. No. 3,726,653, Apr. 10, 1973, “Polymeric pour point depressant for residual fuels.”Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. W. Cole, J. J. Bialy, and W. M. Sweeney, US Pat. No. 3,792,984, Feb. 19, 1974, “Fuel oil blending to improve pour reduction.”Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. F. Miller, US Pat. No. 4,419,106, Dec. 6, 1983, “Hydrocarbon oils with improved pour points.”Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. M. Sweeney, US Pat. No. 3,904,385, Sept. 9, 1975, “Polyacrylates and waxy residual fuel compositions thereof.”Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. I. El-Gamal, A. M. Atta, and A. M. Ai-Sabbagh, Fuel, 76, 1471-1478 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Han, Energy Fuels, 43, 293-299 (2007).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Doucet, I. Denicolo, and A. Craievich, J. Chem. Phys., 75, 5125-5127 (1981).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Doucet, I. Denicolo, and A. Craievich, J. Chem. Phys., 75, 1523-1529 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Boistelle and A. Doussoulin, J. Cryst. Growth, 33, No. 2, 335-352 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Chevallier, D. Petitjean, V. R. Meray, et al., Polymer, 40, 5953-5956 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. P. Srivastava, R. S. Tandon, and P. S. Verma, Fuel, 71, No. 5, 533-537 (1922).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. D. Rubin, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 36, No. 2, 445-448 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. K. Chatterjee, D. S. Phatak, P. S. Murthy, et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 52, No. 7, 887-894 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. A. Holder and J. Winkler, J. Inst. Pet., 51, 228-234 (1965).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. M. El-Gamel and A. M. Al-Sabbagh, Fuel, 75, No. 6, 743-750 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jilu Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tianliang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sheng Han
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringShanghai Institute of TechnologyShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Institute of TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations