Integrating access to care and tumor patterns by race and age in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, 2008–2013
- 21 Downloads
Understanding breast cancer mortality disparities by race and age is complex due to disease heterogeneity, comorbid disease, and the range of factors influencing access to care. It is important to understand how these factors group together within patients.
We compared socioeconomic status (SES) and comorbidity factors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase 3 (CBCS3, 2008–2013) to those for North Carolina using the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study. In addition, we used latent class analysis of CBCS3 data to identify covariate patterns by SES/comorbidities, barriers to care, and tumor characteristics and examined their associations with race and age using multinomial logistic regression.
Major SES and comorbidity patterns in CBCS3 participants were generally similar to patterns in the state. Latent classes were identified for SES/comorbidities, barriers to care, and tumor characteristics that varied by race and age. Compared to white women, black women had lower SES (odds ratio (OR) 6.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2, 7.8), more barriers to care (OR 5.6, 95% CI 3.9, 8.1) and several aggregated tumor aggressiveness features. Compared to older women, younger women had higher SES (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4, 0.6), more barriers to care (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6, 2.9) and aggregated tumor aggressiveness features.
CBCS3 is representative of North Carolina on comparable factors. Patterns of access to care and tumor characteristics are intertwined with race and age, suggesting that interventions to address disparities will need to target both access and biology.
This work was supported by a Grant from the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center funded by the University Cancer Research Fund (LCCC2017T204), Susan G. Komen Graduate Training in Disparities Research, the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (P50-CA58223, U01-CA179715, T32-CA057726), and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (P30-ES010126).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statisitcs System Table 26 (2017) Death rates for malignant neoplasm of breast among females, by race, Hispanic origin and age: United States 2017. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
- 9.Warner ET, Colditz GA, Palmer JR, Partridge AH, Rosner BA, Tamimi RM (2013) Reproductive factors and risk of premenopausal breast cancer by age at diagnosis: are there differences before and after age 40? Breast Cancer Res Treat 142(1):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2721-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Allott EH, Cohen SM, Geradts J, Sun X, Khoury T, Bshara W, Zirpoli GR, Miller CR, Hwang H, Thorne LB, O'Connor S, Tse CK, Bell MB, Hu Z, Li Y, Kirk EL, Bethea TN, Perou CM, Palmer JR, Ambrosone CB, Olshan AF, Troester MA (2016) Performance of three-biomarker immunohistochemistry for Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtyping in the AMBER Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25(3):470–478. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0874 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Allott EH, Geradts J, Cohen SM, Khoury T, Zirpoli GR, Bshara W, Davis W, Omilian A, Nair P, Ondracek RP, Cheng TD, Miller CR, Hwang H, Thorne LB, O'Connor S, Bethea TN, Bell ME, Hu Z, Li Y, Kirk EL, Sun X, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Perou CM, Palmer JR, Olshan AF, Ambrosone CB, Troester MA (2018) Frequency of breast cancer subtypes among African American women in the AMBER consortium. Breast Cancer Res 20(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0939-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.PROC LCA, PROC LTA (Version 1.3.2) [Software] (2015) The Methodology Center, Penn State, University Park. https://methodology.psu.edu/.
- 26.Ashing-Giwa KT, Padilla G, Tejero J, Kraemer J, Wright K, Coscarelli A, Clayton S, Williams I, Hills D (2004) Understanding the breast cancer experience of women: a qualitative study of African American, Asian American, Latina and Caucasian cancer survivors. Psycho-oncology 13(6):408–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.750 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MCU, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS, Millikan RC (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295(21):2492–2502. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.21.2492 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Daly B, Olopade OI (2015) A perfect storm: how tumor biology, genomics, and health care delivery patterns collide to create a racial survival disparity in breast cancer and proposed interventions for change. CA Cancer J Clin 65(3):221–238. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21271 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Tobacco use among US Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups‐Africian‐Americans, American Indians, and Alaska Natives, Asian‐Americans and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics: a report of the surgeon general (1998)Google Scholar
- 40.Sineshaw HM, Gaudet M, Ward EM, Flanders WD, Desantis C, Lin CC, Jemal A (2014) Association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer subtypes in the National Cancer Data Base (2010–2011). Breast Cancer Res Treat 145(3):753–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2976-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar