Racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with health care in association with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis: findings from the SEER-CAHPS data
Black women are more likely to be diagnosed with later stage breast cancer compared to white women due to biological or access to care factors. Therefore, our objective was to identify whether racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with healthcare are associated with stage at diagnosis.
We used the SEER registry data linked with patient surveys from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) completed prior to the diagnosis date. We examined responses about various aspects of their care such as the ability to get needed care, and to get care quickly. We used multivariable linear regression to examine racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences, and a multivariable ordinal logistic regression to determine the association between patient experiences and earlier stage at diagnosis.
Of the 10,144 patients, 80.7% were non-Hispanic white, 7.6% black, 7.1% Hispanic, and 4.6% Asian. After controlling for potential confounders, black patients had significantly lower mean scores for getting care quickly (β = − 2.78), getting needed care (β = − 2.26), getting needed prescription drugs (β = − 3.83), and lower ratings of their health care (β = − 2.33) compared to white patients. More importantly, we found that black patients who reported a 1-unit increase in rating of their experiences with customer service (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.06) and the ability to get care quickly (OR 1.03, 1.01–1.05) had higher odds of earlier stage breast cancer.
Racial/ethnic minorities reported poorer patient experiences with care preceding a diagnosis of breast cancer. Better ratings among black patients were associated with earlier stage at diagnosis.
KeywordsBreast cancer Consumer Assessment of Healthcare and Providers (CAHPS) Health care disparities Patient experiences Cancer stage
The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the National Cancer Institute; the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Information Management Services (IMS), Inc.; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-CAHPS database.
AJF: Conceptualization, methodology, writing- original draft, review, and editing. CO: Conceptualization, writing- original draft, review, and editing. GT: Conceptualization, writing- original draft, review, and editing. SB: Formal analysis, methodology, writing- review and editing. ASH: Conceptualization, methodology, writing- review and editing. XLD: Conceptualization, methodology, writing- review and editing.
A.J.F was a postdoctoral fellow supported by a University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health Cancer Education and Career Development Program grant from the National Cancer Institute (Grant No. R25-CA57712). This study used the linked SEER-CAHPS database.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- 7.Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 10.Institute of Medicine (2013) Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 21.Baicker K, Chandra A (2004) Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries' quality of care. Health Aff 23:W4–W184Google Scholar
- 27.National Cancer Institute. Medicare CAHPS Data Documentation. https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/seer-cahps/aboutdata/documentation.html. Accessed October, 2019.
- 28.Dosch AR, Koru-Sengul T, Miao F, Tannenbaum SL, Byrne MM, Wright JL (2014) Racial and ethnic disparities in the diagnosis of breast cancer: changes in presenting stage in minority populations in Florida during 1981–2009. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148(2):379–387PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Morales LS, Elliott MN, Weeck-Maldonado R, Spritzer KL, Hays RD (2001) Differences in CAHPS [R] adult survey reports and ratings by Race and Ethnicity: an analysis of the National CAHPS [R] Benchmarking Data 1.0.(National Consumer Assessment of Health Plans) (Statistical Data Included). Health Serv Res 36(3):595.Google Scholar
- 36.National Cancer Patient Experience Programme 2014 Survey (2014) Athena Information Solutions Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
- 42.Izadirad H, Zareban I (2015) The relationship of health literacy with health status, preventive behaviors and health services utilization in Baluchistan. Iran. Hamadan-Univ-Med-Sci 2(3):43–50Google Scholar
- 45.Fowler BA (2014) Neighborhood-level influences on delays in diagnostic follow-up from mammography screening in African-American Women: a systematic review. J Women’s Health Care 3(151):1Google Scholar
- 46.Warnecke RB, Campbell RT, Vijayasiri G, Barrett RE, Rauscher GH (2019) Multilevel examination of health disparity: the role of policy implementation in neighborhood context, in patient resources, and in healthcare facilities on later stage of breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 28(1):59CrossRefGoogle Scholar