Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 30, Issue 11, pp 1251–1258 | Cite as

Differences in reported sun protection practices, skin cancer knowledge, and perceived risk for skin cancer between rural and urban high school students

  • Elizabeth S. Nagelhout
  • Bridget G. Parsons
  • Benjamin Haaland
  • Kenneth P. Tercyak
  • Kelsey Zaugg
  • Angela Zhu
  • Garrett Harding
  • Jeffrey Yancey
  • Jakob D. Jensen
  • Douglas Grossman
  • David W. Wetter
  • Yelena P. WuEmail author
Original Paper
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate differences in reported use of sun protection, tanning behaviors, skin cancer-related knowledge, and perceived risk between rural and urban high school students in a geographic area with high rates of melanoma.

Methods

A total of 1,570 high school students (56.8% female) from urban (6 schools) and rural (7 schools) geographic areas in Utah completed questionnaires assessing sun protection and tanning behaviors, skin cancer-related knowledge, and perceived risk for skin cancer. Analyses examined potential differences in these outcomes between rural and urban students and by gender.

Results

Compared to students in urban areas, those in rural areas had lower odds of wearing sunscreen (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53, 0.95; p = 0.022), re-applying sunscreen (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.74, 1.02; p = 0.002), wearing long-sleeved shirts (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.46, 0.86; p = 0.004), and seeking shade (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.50, 0.88; p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Rural students reported less adequate use of sun protection than urban students. Rural male students reported lower knowledge scores compared to urban males. Future skin cancer prevention efforts targeting rural high schoolers are warranted.

Keywords

Skin cancer Rural health Health education Cancer prevention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the efforts of the following individuals for their assistance with data collection: Ayesha Patil, Patsaporn Kanokvimankul, Judy Ou, Rachel Forrest, Jane Ostler, Jennyffer Morales, Chelsea Ratcliff Bush, Katheryn Christy, Samuel Whittier, and Alexa Wright. This work was supported by the Utah Department of Health (Centers for Disease Control Grant Number 1NU58DP006321) and a pilot grant from Cancer Control and Population Sciences at Huntsman Cancer Institute (both to Y.P.W.). Yelena Wu, David Wetter, and Douglas Grossman were supported by the Huntsman Cancer Foundation. Yelena Wu and Douglas Grossman were also supported by the Department of Dermatology at the University of Utah. This work was also supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (K07CA196985; Y.P.W., P30CA042014; D.W; P30CA051008; K.P.T.). Dr. Jensen was supported by the National Institute of Health 1DP2EB022360-01 (PI: J. Jensen) and 3P30CA042014-29S7 (PI: J. Jensen). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Data entry for this project was completed using REDCap, which is supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (8UL1TR000105, formerly UL1RR025764). We acknowledge the support of the Office of Communications supported by funds in conjunction with grant P30 CA042014 awarded to Huntsman Cancer Institute. This work was supported by funding from the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program at the University of Utah awarded to Angela Zhu.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All study procedures were approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board and the appropriate school district authorities.

Informed consent

Prior to data collection, consent cover letters were sent by schools to all parents, allowing them to opt their child out of participation.

References

  1. 1.
    Melanoma of the Skin—SEER Stat Fact Sheets (2017). https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html. Accessed 16 Oct 2018
  2. 2.
    Ekwueme DU, Guy GP Jr, Li C, Rim SH, Parelkar P, Chen SC (2011) The health burden and economic costs of cutaneous melanoma mortality by race/ethnicity-United States, 2000 to 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 65(5 Suppl 1):S133–S143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guy GP, Ekwueme DU (2011) Years of potential life lost and indirect costs of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 29(10):863–874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guy GP, Machlin SR, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR (2014) Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the US, 2002–2006 and 2007–2011. Am J Prev Med 48(2):183–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NAACCR Fast Stats: an interactive quick tool for quick access to key NAACCR cancer statistics. https://www.naaccr.org/. Accessed 16 Oct 2018
  6. 6.
    Coory M, Smithers M, Aitken J, Baade P, Ring I (2006) Urban-rural differences in survival from cutaneous melanoma in Queensland. Aust N Z J Public Health 30(1):71–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zahnd WE, James AS, Jenkins WD et al (2018) Rural-urban differences in cancer incidence and trends in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27:1265–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henley SJ, Anderson RN, Thomas CC, Massetti GM, Peaker B, Richardson LC (2017) Invasive cancer incidence, 2004–2013, and deaths, 2006–2015, in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan counties—United States. MMWR Surveill Summ 66(14):1–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mounessa JS, Caravaglio J, Dellavalle RP (2017) Comparison of regional and state differences in melanoma rates in the united states: 2003 vs 2013. JAMA Dermatol 153(3):345–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    2010 Census Urban and Rural Classification and Urban Area Criteria (2012). https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2010.html, 2017.
  11. 11.
    Armstrong BK, Kricker A (1993) How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Res 3(6):395–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balk SJ (2011) Ultraviolet radiation: a hazard to children and adolescents. Am Acad Pediatr 127(3):e791–e817Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green AC, Wallingford SC, McBride P (2011) Childhood exposure to ultraviolet radiation and harmful skin effects: epidemiological evidence. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 107(3):349–355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu S, Han J, Laden F, Qureshi AA (2014) Long-term ultraviolet flux, other potential risk factors, and skin cancer risk: a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(6):1080–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Godar DE, Wengraitis SP, Shreffler J, Sliney DH (2001) UV doses of Americans. J Photochem Photobiol 73(6):621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Whiteman DC, Whiteman CA, Green AC (2001) Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Causes Control 12(1):69–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olson AL, Gaffney CA, Starr P, Dietrich AJ (2008) The impact of an appearance-based educational intervention on adolescent intention to use sunscreen. Health Educ Res 23(5):763–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Demko CA, Borawski EA, Debanne SM, Cooper KD, Stange KC (2003) Use of indoor tanning facilities by white adolescents in the united states. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(9):854–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duncan MJ, Kerry Mummery W, Kift RL (2008) Geographical location and sunburn in Queensland adults. Aust J Rural Health 16(3):181–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kalia S, Kwong YKK, Haiducu ML, Lui H (2013) Comparison of sun protection behaviour among urban and rural health regions in Canada. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27(11):1452–1454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mermelstein RJ, Riesenberg LA (1992) Changing knowledge and attitudes about skin cancer risk factors in adolescents. Health Psychol 11(6):371–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skin Cancer Rates by State (2017). https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/statistics/state.htm. Accessed 16 Oct 2018
  23. 23.
    Sweeney C, Herget KA, Otto VY, McFadden S, Millar MM. Cancer in Utah: an overview of incidence and mortality 2004–2013. Utah Cancer Registry. 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hall HI, May DS, Lew RA, Koh HK, Nadel M (1997) Sun protection behaviors of the US white population. Prev Med 26(4):401–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koh HK, Bak SM, Geller AC et al (1997) Sunbathing habits and sunscreen use among white adults: results of a national survey. Am J Public Health 87(7):1214–1217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robinson JK, Rademaker AW, Sylvester JA, Cook B (1997) Summer sun exposure: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Midwest adolescents. Prev Med 26(3):364–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes (2017). https://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/. Accessed 16 Oct 2018
  28. 28.
    Glanz K, Yaroch AL, Dancel M et al (2008) Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch Dermatol 144(2):217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aspinwall LG, Taber JM, Kohlmann W, Leaf SL, Leachman SA (2014) Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall. J Genet Couns 23(3):421–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program] (2014). Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Utah (2018). https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/UT. Accessed 16 Oct 2018
  32. 32.
    Guy GP Jr, Holman DM, Watson M (2016) The important role of schools in the prevention of skin cancer. JAMA Dermatol 152(10):1083–1084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    US Department of Health, and Human Services (2014) The surgeon general's call to action to prevent skin cancer. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Glanz K, McCarty F, Nehl EJ et al (2009) Validity of self-reported sunscreen use by parents, children, and lifeguards. Am J Prev Med 36(1):63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lower T, Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher R (1998) How valid is adolescents' self-report as a way of assessing sun protection practices? Am J Prev Med 27(3):385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth S. Nagelhout
    • 1
  • Bridget G. Parsons
    • 2
  • Benjamin Haaland
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kenneth P. Tercyak
    • 4
  • Kelsey Zaugg
    • 2
  • Angela Zhu
    • 2
  • Garrett Harding
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Yancey
    • 2
  • Jakob D. Jensen
    • 5
  • Douglas Grossman
    • 2
    • 6
    • 7
  • David W. Wetter
    • 2
  • Yelena P. Wu
    • 2
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Public Health, Department of Family & Preventive MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Huntsman Cancer InstituteSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  4. 4.Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashington, DCUSA
  5. 5.Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  6. 6.Department of Oncological SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  7. 7.Department of DermatologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations