How the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership shapes the public health workforce
- 135 Downloads
This paper explores how, through its extensive network of partners, the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership (National Partnership) has provided a robust array of trainings, learning institutes, webinars, workshops, mentorship programs, and direct technical assistance to comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions over the past 20 years. Mapping these activities to specific cancer control competencies revealed that the efforts of the National Partnership adequately address the core competencies necessary for an effective workforce and have the potential to increase practitioner capacity to adopt and implement evidence-based cancer control programs. Ensuring the continued availability and uptake of these tools, trainings and partnerships could potentially address gaps and barriers in the public health workforce related to evidence-based practice.
KeywordsComprehensive cancer control Workforce development Training and technical assistance Competency mapping Cancer prevention and control
The authors thank Sarah Shafir, Lorrie Graaf, and Todd Tyler of the American Cancer Society and Dalena Nguyen, formerly of the National Cancer Institute, for their assistance in data collection and presentation. This research was supported in part by an appointment (K. Gibson) to the Research Participation Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.All Hands on Deck: Making the Case for Comprehensive Cancer Control Retrieved from https://smhs.gwu.edu/cancercontroltap/sites/cancercontroltap/files/CCCNP%20Business%20Case%20Flyer%20-%20External.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2018
- 5.Institute of Medicine (2003) The future of the public’s health in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 23.National Cancer Institute. Research Tested Intervention Programs (RTIPs) National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD (2018) https://rtips.cancer.gov. Accessed 20 July 2018
- 33.https://cancercenter.gwu.edu/for-health-professionals/training-education. Accessed 28 Sept 2018
- 36.Research To Reality. About R2R Mentorship Program. https://researchtoreality.cancer.gov/mentorship/about. Accessed 13 Mar 2018
- 37.National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO). Building Local Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalitions: Lessons Learned from Local Health Departments. 2013.https://bit.ly/2KYaGMx. Accessed 20 July 2018
- 38.Weiss S, Ruhe M, Green T (2018) Local implementation and capacity of cancer prevention and control: a National Review of Local Health Department Activities. National Association of County and City Health Officials, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 39.Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Local Community Health Programs. https://ww5.komen.org/WhatWeDo/IntheCommunity/LocalCommunityHealthPrograms/LocalCommunityHealthPrograms.html. Accessed 20 July 2018
- 41.Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Harrigan M, Sanft TB, Wong C, Hughes M, Hootsmans N, Winterhalter B, Shockro L, O’Connor K, Tolaney SM, Mayer EL, Yung RL, Freedman RA, Ligibel JA (2015) Impact of the LIVESTRONG at the YMCA Program on physical activity, fitness, and quality of life in cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 33(15_suppl):9508–9508Google Scholar
- 42.Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Harrigan M, Li F, Sanft T, Shockro L, O’connor K, Campbell N, Tolaney SM, Mayer EL, Ligibel JA (2017) Effect of the LIVESTRONG® at the YMCA exercise program on physical activity, fitness, quality of life and fatigue in cancer survivors. Cancer 123(7):1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30456 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/healthy_homes/smokefree. Accessed 28 Sept 2018