Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 29, Issue 11, pp 1007–1014 | Cite as

Nutritional epidemiology and cancer: A Tale of Two Cities

  • Edward Giovannucci
Commentary

Abstract

Recently, Ioannidis questioned whether nutritional epidemiology could be reconciled with good scientific principles, and suggested that the field needs radical reform. One of the reforms he advocated was more randomized trials; though what diet would be tested and how it would be measured were unspecified, how adherence would be monitored was unclear or unimportant, and the length of time vaguely stated as “lifelong”. The other reform was reanalysis of shared data, which actually already exists in a large number of cohort consortia of individual pooled data. The 2018 report analysis of diet and cancer from the World Cancer Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research presents a sharply different picture of our knowledge of nutrition and cancer, which has evolved immensely in the past 3 decades. Based on current knowledge, factors related to energy balance, encompassed by body mass anthropometric measures might account for about 10–15% of the U.S. cancer burden. This 10–15% encompasses physical activity and obesogenic effects of diet. About 5% may be attributable to alcohol, and another 5% to specific dietary factors combined (e.g., red and processed meat, whole grains, fiber, calcium, fruits, and vegetables). Surrogates such as attained height and age at menarche are influenced by nutrition and are consistent risk factors for cancer, supporting the importance of early nutrition. Recent data suggest that early life dietary patterns, which may be modifiable, may be important. Though important questions remain, our understanding of nutrition and cancer over the life course is coherent and has been informed by nutritional epidemiology and other data.

Keyword

Nutritional epidemiology Cancer Epidemiology Diet 

References

  1. 1.
    Trepanowski JF, Ioannidis JPA (2018) Perspective: limiting dependence on nonrandomized studies and improving randomized trials in human nutrition research: why and how. Adv Nutr 9(4):367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ioannidis JP (2013) Implausible results in human nutrition research. BMJ 347:f6698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ioannidis JPA (2018) The challenge of reforming nutritional epidemiologic research. JAMA 320:969–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belluz J (2018) This mediterranean diet study was hugely impactful. The science just fell apart. https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/6/20/17464906/mediterranean-diet-science-health-predimed. Accessed 20 June 2018
  5. 5.
    Satija A, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB et al (2018) Perspective: are large, simple trials the solution for nutrition research? Adv Nutr 9(4):378–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer. Accessed 7 Sept 2018
  7. 7.
    Thompson R, Mitrou G, Brown S et al (2018) Major new review of global evidence on diet, nutrition and physical activity: a blueprint to reduce cancer risk. Nutr Bull 43:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonovas S, Fiorino G, Lytras T et al (2016) Calcium supplementation for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastroenterol 22(18):4594–4603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doll R, Peto R (1981) The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst 66(6):1191–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martinez M, Marshall J, Giovannucci E (2008) Diet and cancer prevention: the roles of observation and experimentation. Nat Rev Cancer 8(9):694–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blot W, Tarone R (2015) Doll and Peto’s quantitative estimates of cancer risks: holding generally true for 35 years. J Natl Cancer Inst.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv044 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Islami F, Goding Sauer A, Miller KD et al (2018) Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 68(1):31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parkin DM, Boyd L, Walker LC (2011) The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer 105(Suppl 2):S77–S81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kabat GC, Matthews CE, Kamensky V et al (2015) Adherence to cancer prevention guidelines and cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and total mortality: a prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 101(3):558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang C, Rexrode KM, Van Dam RM et al (2008) Abdominal obesity and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: sixteen years of follow-up in US women. Circulation 117(13):1658–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keum N, Lee D, Kim R et al (2015) Visceral adiposity and colorectal adenomas: dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Oncol 26(6):1101–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Liu Y et al. Height, predictors of C-peptide and cancer risk in men. Int J Epidemiol 33(1):217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farvid MS, Chen WY, Michels KB et al (2016) Fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ 353:i2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuan C, Spiegelman D, Rimm EB et al (2018) Relative validity of nutrient intakes assessed by questionnaire, 24-hour recalls, and diet records as compared with urinary recovery and plasma concentration biomarkers: findings for women. Am J Epidemiol 187(5):1051–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuan C, Spiegelman D, Rimm EB et al (2017) Validity of a dietary questionnaire assessed by comparison with multiple weighed dietary records or 24-hour recalls. Am J Epidemiol 185(7):570–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park Y, Dodd KW, Kipnis V et al (2018) Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers. Am J Clin Nutr 107(1):80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shu XO, Yang G, Jin F et al (2004) Validity and reproducibility of the food frequency questionnaire used in the Shanghai Women’s Health Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 58(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Voss S et al (1999) Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods. Am J Clin Nutr 70(4):439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tabung FK, Brown LS, Fung TT (2017) Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk: a review of 17 years of evidence (2000–2016). Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 13(6):440–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz DL, Meller S (2014) Can we say what diet is best for health? Annu Rev Public Health 35:83–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fogelholm M, Anderssen S, Gunnarsdottir I et al (2012) Dietary macronutrients and food consumption as determinants of long-term weight change in adult populations: a systematic literature review. Food Nutr Res 56:19103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD et al (2011) The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 378(9793):804–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rodgers A, Woodward A, Swinburn B et al (2018) Prevalence trends tell us what did not precipitate the US obesity epidemic. Lancet Public Health 3(4):e162–e163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scarborough P, Burg MR, Foster C et al (2011) Increased energy intake entirely accounts for increase in body weight in women but not in men in the UK between 1986 and 2000. Br J Nutr 105(9):1399–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giovannucci E (2018) An integrative approach for deciphering the causal associations of physical activity and cancer risk: the role of adiposity. J Natl Cancer Inst 110(9):935–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tabung FK, Smith-Warner SA, Chavarro JE et al (2016) Development and validation of an empirical dietary inflammatory index. J Nutr 146(8):1560–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tabung FK, Wang W, Fung TT et al (2016) Development and validation of empirical indices to assess the insulinaemic potential of diet and lifestyle. Br J Nutr 8:1–12Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tabung FK, Liu L, Wang W et al (2018) Association of dietary inflammatory potential with colorectal cancer risk in men and women. JAMA Oncol 4(3):366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tabung FK, Wang W, Fung TT et al (2018) Association of dietary insulinemic potential and colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 108(2):363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Giovannucci E (2018) A framework to understand diet, physical activity, body weight, and cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 29(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvado J et al (2018) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med 378(25):e34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Keum N, Giovannucci E (2014) Vitamin D supplements and cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 111(5):976–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE et al (2013) Cancer genome landscapes. Science 339(6127):1546–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Burt LM, Ying J, Poppe MM et al (2017) Risk of secondary malignancies after radiation therapy for breast cancer: comprehensive results. Breast 35:122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bauer J, Buttner P, Murali R et al (2011) BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma are independently associated with age, anatomic site of the primary tumor, and the degree of solar elastosis at the primary tumor site. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 24(2):345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smith AH, Marshall G, Roh T et al (2018) Lung, bladder, and kidney cancer mortality 40 years after arsenic exposure reduction. J Natl Cancer Inst 110(3):241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vedham V, Verma M, Mahabir S (2015) Early-life exposures to infectious agents and later cancer development. Cancer Med 4(12):1908–1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Giovannucci E (2018) Aspirin and delayed chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. Clin Chem 64(10):11Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Flossmann E, Rothwell PM (2007) British Doctors Aspirin Trial and the UK-TIA Aspirin Trial. Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidence from randomised and observational studies. Lancet 369(9573):1603–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cook NR, Lee IM, Zhang SM et al (2013) Alternate-day, low-dose aspirin and cancer risk: long-term observational follow-up of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 159(2):77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Hemelrijck MJ, Michaud DS, Connolly GN et al (2009) Tobacco use and bladder cancer patterns in three western European countries. J Public Health 31(3):335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee JE, Willett WC, Fuchs CS et al (2011) Folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma: modification by time. Am J Clin Nutr 93(4):817–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Ritz J et al (2006) Methods for pooling results of epidemiologic studies: the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer. Am J Epidemiol 163(11):1053–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jung S, Spiegelman D, Baglietto L et al (2013) Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of breast cancer by hormone receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(3):219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eliassen AH, Hendrickson SJ, Brinton LA et al (2012) Circulating carotenoids and risk of breast cancer: pooled analysis of eight prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(24):1905–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Park Y, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ et al (2010) Intakes of vitamins A, C, and E and use of multiple vitamin supplements and risk of colon cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control 21(11):1745–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kim DH, Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D et al (2010) Pooled analyses of 13 prospective cohort studies on folate intake and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 21(11):1919–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Koushik A, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D et al (2007) Fruits, vegetables, and colon cancer risk in a pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(19):1471–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cho E, Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D et al (2004) Dairy foods, calcium, and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 10 cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(13):1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cho E, Smith-Warner SA, Ritz J et al (2004) Alcohol intake and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 8 cohort studies. Ann Intern Med 140(8):603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McCullough ML, Zoltick ES, Weinstein SJ et al (2018) Circulating vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: an international pooling project of 17 cohorts. J Natl Cancer Inst.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Prasad V, Jorgenson J, Ioannidis JP et al (2013) Observational studies often make clinical practice recommendations: an empirical evaluation of authors’ attitudes. J Clin Epidemiol 66(4):361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    American Institute for Cancer Research. 2017 AICR cancer risk awareness survey report. http://www.aicr.org
  59. 59.
    Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8):e124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E et al (1997) A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 336(16):1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Li Y, Pan A, Wang DD et al (2018) Impact of healthy lifestyle factors on life expectancies in the US population. Circulation 138(4):345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Brown SB, Hankinson SE (2015) Endogenous estrogens and the risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. Steroids 99(Pt A):8–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Klement RJ, Fink MK (2016) Dietary and pharmacological modification of the insulin/IGF-1 system: exploiting the full repertoire against cancer. Oncogenesis 5:e193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hernandez AV, Pasupuleti V, Benites-Zapata VA et al (2015) Insulin resistance and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 51(18):2747–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chen L, Li L, Wang Y et al (2013) Circulating C-peptide level is a predictive factor for colorectal neoplasia: evidence from the meta-analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Causes Control 24(10):1837–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Travis RC, Appleby PN, Martin RM et al (2016) A meta-analysis of individual participant data reveals an association between circulating levels of IGF-1 and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res 76(8):2288–2300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chi F, Wu R, Zeng YC et al (2013) Circulation insulin-like growth factor peptides and colorectal cancer risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep 40(5):3583–3590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wolpin BM, Bao Y, Qian ZR et al (2013) Hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, impaired pancreatic β-cell function, and risk of pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(14):1027–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nead KT, Sharp SJ, Thompson DJ et al (2015) Evidence of a causal association between insulinemia and endometrial cancer: a mendelian randomization analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv178 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations