Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 1117–1123 | Cite as

Residential magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia: a population-based case–control study in California

  • Leeka Kheifets
  • Catherine M. Crespi
  • Chris Hooper
  • Myles Cockburn
  • Aryana T. Amoon
  • Ximena P. Vergara
Original paper

Abstract

Purpose

Studies have reported an increased risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to magnetic fields. We conducted a large records-based case–control study of childhood leukemia risk and exposure to magnetic fields from power lines in California.

Methods

The study included 5,788 childhood leukemia cases (born in and diagnosed in California 1986–2008) matched to population-based controls on age and sex. We calculated magnetic fields at birth addresses using geographic information systems, aerial imagery, historical information on load and phasing, and site visits.

Results

Based on unconditional logistic regression controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status using subjects geocoded to a basic standard of accuracy, we report a slight risk deficit in two intermediate exposure groups and a small excess risk in the highest exposure group (odds ratio of 1.50 (95% confidence interval [0.70, 3.23])). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses as well as matched analyses gave similar results. All estimates had wide confidence intervals.

Conclusion

Our large, statewide, record-based case–control study of childhood leukemia in California does not in itself provide clear evidence of risk associated with greater exposure to magnetic fields from power lines, but could be viewed as consistent with previous findings of increased risk.

Keywords

Childhood leukemia Case–control study EMF Magnetic fields GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The California Power Line Study is funded by the Electric Power Research Institute. Crespi was also partially support by National Institutes of Health CA 16042. The study was approved by University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Office for the Protection of Research Subjects, University of Southern California (USC) Institutional Review Board, and California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS). We are extremely grateful to Michael Herz of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Glenn Sias and Phil Hung from Southern California Edison, Marilyn Dulich of San Diego Gas and Electric Company, Josephine Gonzalez of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and other employees of these utilities who contributed generously of their time and provided key data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kheifets L, Shimkhada R (2005) Childhood leukemia and EMF: review of the epidemiologic evidence. Bioelectromagnetics 26(S7):S51–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M et al (2000) A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 83(5):692–698CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT et al (2000) A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group. Epidemiology 11(6):624–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Crespi CM et al (2010) Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 103(7):1128–1135CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wertheimer N, Leeper E (1979) Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 109(3):273–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Savitz DA, Wachtel H, Barnes FA et al (1988) Case–control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol 128(1):21–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    London SJ, Thomas DC, Bowman JD et al (1991) Exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia. Am J Epidemiol 134(9):923–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linet MS, Hatch EE, Kleinerman RA et al (1997) Residential exposure to magnetic fields and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med 337(1):1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kabuto M, Nitta H, Yamamoto S et al (2006) Childhood leukemia and magnetic fields in Japan: a case–control study of childhood leukemia and residential power-frequency magnetic fields in Japan. Int J Cancer 119(3):643–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McBride ML, Gallagher RP, Theriault G et al (1999) Power-frequency electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia in Canada. Am J Epidemiol 149(9):831–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green LM, Miller AB, Agnew DA et al (1999) Childhood leukemia and personal monitoring of residential exposures to electric and magnetic fields in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Causes Control 10(3):233–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Draper G, Vincent T, Kroll ME, Swanson J (2005) Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case–control study. BMJ 330(7503):1290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sermage-Faure C, Demoury C, Rudant J et al (2013) Childhood leukaemia close to high-voltage power lines—the Geocap study, 2002–2007. Br J Cancer 108(9):1899–1906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crespi CM, Vergara XP, Hooper C et al (2016) Childhood leukaemia and distance from power lines in California: a population-based case–control study. Br J Cancer 115(1):122–128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feychting M, Alhbom M (1993) Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol 138(7):467–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verkasalo PK, Pukkala E, Hongisto MY et al (1993) Risk of cancer in Finnish children living close to power lines. BMJ 307(6909):895–899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tynes T, Haldorsen T (1997) Electromagnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Norwegian high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol 145(3):219–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pedersen C, Johansen C, Schuz J et al (2015) Residential exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukaemia, CNS tumor, and lymphoma in Denmark. Br J Cancer 113(9):1370–1374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kroll ME, Swanson J, Vincent TJ, Draper GJ (2010) Childhood cancer and magnetic fields from high-voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case–control study. Br J Cancer 103(7):1122–1127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bunch KJ, Swanson J, Vincent TJ, Murphy MF (2016) Epidemiological study of power lines and childhood cancer in the UK: further analyses. J Radiol Prot 36(3):437–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kheifets L, Crespi CM, Hooper C et al (2013) Epidemiologic study of residential proximity to transmission lines and childhood cancer in California: description of design, epidemiologic methods and study population. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 25(1):45–52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vergara XP, Kavet R, Crespi CM et al (2015) Estimating magnetic fields of homes near transmission lines in the california power line study. Environ Res 140:514–523CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    The California Cancer Registry. Mission Statement & Purpose. http://www.ccrcal.org/Inside_CCR/About_Us.html. Updated March 2009. Accessed 2016
  24. 24.
    Oksuzyan S, Crespi CM, Cockburn M et al (2012) Birth weight and other perinatal characteristics and childhood leukemia in California. Cancer Epidemiol 36(6):e359–e365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldberg DW, Cockburn MG (2010) Improving geocode accuracy with candidate selection criteria. Trans GIS 14(s1):149–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P (2001) A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv Methodol 27:85–95Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL (1999) Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med 18:681–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bunch KJ, Keegan TJ, Swanson J et al (2014) Residential distance at birth from overhead high-voltage powerlines: childhood cancer risk in Britain 1962–2008. Br J Cancer 110(5):1402–1408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. Published 2014
  30. 30.
    Oksuzyan S, Crespi CM, Cockburn M et al (2015) Race/ethnicity and the risk of childhood leukaemia: a case–control study in California. J Epidemiol Community Health 69(8):795–802CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oksuzyan S, Crespi CM, Cockburn M, et al. (2015) Socio-economic status and childhood leukemia in California. Cancer Prev Curr Res 3(4)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kheifets L, Swanson J, Yuan Y et al (2016) Comparative analyses of studies of magnetic fields, radon and gamma radiation. J Radiol Prot 37(2):459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyUCLA Fielding School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiostatisticsUCLA Fielding School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Enertech ConsultantsCampbellUSA
  4. 4.Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Energy and EnvironmentElectric Power Research InstitutePalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations