Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 1033–1041 | Cite as

Tubal ligation and ovarian cancer risk in African American women

  • Chrissy McNamara
  • Sarah E. Abbott
  • Elisa V. Bandera
  • Bo Qin
  • Lauren C. Peres
  • Fabian Camacho
  • Patricia G. Moorman
  • Anthony J. Alberg
  • Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
  • Melissa Bondy
  • Michele L. Cote
  • Ellen Funkhouser
  • Edward S. Peters
  • Ann G. Schwartz
  • Joellen M. Schildkraut
  • Paul TerryEmail author
Original paper

Abstract

Purpose

Tubal ligation has been associated with reduced risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in studies of primarily white women, but less is known about the association in African American (AA) women. We sought to evaluate the associations among 597 invasive ovarian cancer cases and 742 controls of AA descent recruited from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study, a population-based case–control study in 11 geographical areas in the US.

Methods

Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for potentially confounding factors.

Results

An inverse association between tubal ligation and EOC was observed that was not statistically significant (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68–1.14). However, an inverse association with EOC risk was observed among women who had a tubal ligation at age 35 years or older (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41–0.98), but not among those who had a tubal ligation before age 35 (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.74–1.29) (p for interaction = 0.08). The association also varied considerably by tumor subtype. A strong inverse association was observed for endometrioid tumors (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14–0.70), whereas associations with mucinous (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.36–2.12) and serous (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71–1.24) tumors were weaker and not statistically significant. A statistically non-significant positive association for clear cell tumors (OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.58–5.82) was based on a low number of cases.

Conclusions

Our findings show that tubal ligation may confer a reduced risk for EOC among AA women that is comparable to the associations that have been previously observed in primarily white populations.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer Epidemiologic studies Tubal ligation African-American women 

Abbreviations

AA

African American

AACES

African American Cancer Epidemiology Study

BMI

Body mass index

CI

Confidence intervals

OR

Odds ratio

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the AACES interviewers, Christine Bard, LaTonda Briggs, Whitney Franz (North Carolina) and Robin Gold (Detroit). We also acknowledge the individuals responsible for facilitating case ascertainment across the ten sites including: Jennifer Burczyk-Brown (Alabama); Rana Bayakly, Vicki Bennett and Judy Andrews (Georgia); the Louisiana Tumor Registry; Lisa Paddock and Manisha Narang (New Jersey); Diana Slone, Yingli Wolinsky, Steven Waggoner, Anne Heugel, Nancy Fusco, Kelly Ferguson, Peter Rose, Deb Strater, Taryn Ferber, Donna White, Lynn Borzi, Eric Jenison, Nairmeen Haller, Debbie Thomas, Vivian von Gruenigen, Michele McCarroll, Joyce Neading, John Geisler, Stephanie Smiddy, David Cohn, Michele Vaughan, Luis Vaccarello, Elayna Freese, James Pavelka, Pam Plummer, William Nahhas, Ellen Cato, John Moroney, Mark Wysong, Tonia Combs, Marci Bowling, Brandon Fletcher (Ohio); Susan Bolick, Donna Acosta, Catherine Flanagan (South Carolina); Martin Whiteside (Tennessee) and Georgina Armstrong and the Texas Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Department of State Health Services.

Funding

The current study was supported by the New Jersey Commission on Cancer Research. The AACES study was funded by NCI (R01CA142081). Additional support was provided by Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS) with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Dept. of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN261201000028C and the Epidemiology Research Core, supported in part by NCI Center Grant (P30CA22453) to the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine and NCI Center Grant (P30CA072720) to the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey. The New Jersey State Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, is funded by the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute under contract HHSN261201300021I, the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under grant 5U58DP003931-02 as well as the State of New Jersey and the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey. The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.

Author contributions

All authors participated in the design of the research; C.M., P.D.T., F.C., and S.E.A. performed analyses, and all authors wrote the paper. C.M. and P. D.T. had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

10552_2017_943_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cancer Facts & Figures (2016) A. C. Society, Ed., ed. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terplan M, Schluterman N, McNamara EJ, Tracy JK, Temkin SM (2011) Have racial disparities in ovarian cancer increased over time? An analysis of SEER data, (in eng). Gynecol Oncol 125:19–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaitskell K et al (2016) Tubal ligation and incidence of 26 site-specific cancers in the Million Women Study, (in eng). Br J Cancer 114:1033–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu AH, Pearce CL, Tseng CC, Pike MC (2015) African Americans and Hispanics remain at lower risk of ovarian cancer than non-hispanic whites after considering nongenetic risk factors and oophorectomy rates, (in eng). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:1094–1100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madsen C, Baandrup L, Dehlendorff C, Kjaer SK (2014) Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study, (in eng). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94:86–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rice MS, Hankinson SE, Tworoger SS (2014) Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, unilateral oophorectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer in the nurses’ health studies, (in eng). Fertil Steril 102:192–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rice MS et al (2013) Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer in the new england case–control study, (in eng). Int J Cancer 133:2415–2421CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sieh W et al (2013) Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case–control studies, (in eng). Int J Epidemiol 42:579–589CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wentzensen N et al (2016) Ovarian cancer risk factors by histologic subtype: an analysis from the ovarian cancer cohort consortium, (in eng). J Clin Oncol 34(24):2888–2898CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rice MS, Murphy MA, Tworoger SS (2012) Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis, (in eng). J Ovarian Res 5:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gates MA, Rosner BA, Hecht JL, Tworoger SS (2009) Risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic subtype, (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 171:45–53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moorman PG, Palmieri RT, Akushevich L, Berchuck A, Schildkraut JM (2009) Ovarian cancer risk factors in African-American and white women, (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 170:598–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagle CM, Olsen CM, Webb PM, Jordan SJ, Whiteman DC, Green AC (2008) Endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancers: a comparative analysis of risk factors, (in eng). Eur J Cancer 44:2477–2484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shu XO, Brinton LA, Gao YT, Yuan JM (1989) Population-based case–control study of ovarian cancer in Shanghai, (in eng). Cancer Res 49:3670–3674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alberg AJ et al (2016) Socioeconomic status in relation to the risk of ovarian cancer in African-American Women: a population-based case–control study, (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 184:274–283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ness RB, Grisso JA, Klapper J, Vergona R (2000) Racial differences in ovarian cancer risk, (in eng). J Natl Med Assoc 92:176–182PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kjaer SK, Mellemkjaer L, Brinton LA, Johansen C, Gridley G, Olsen JH (2004) Tubal sterilization and risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer. A Danish population-based follow-up study of more than 65,000 sterilized women, (in eng). Int J Epidemiol 33:596–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tung KH et al (2003) Reproductive factors and epithelial ovarian cancer risk by histologic type: a multiethnic case–control study, (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 158:629–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Modugno F, Ness RB, Wheeler JE (2001) Reproductive risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer according to histologic type and invasiveness, (in eng). Ann Epidemiol 11:568–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosenblatt KA, Thomas DB (1996) Reduced risk of ovarian cancer in women with a tubal ligation or hysterectomy. The World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives, (in eng). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 5:933–935Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCluggage WG (2011) Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis, (in eng). Pathology 43:420–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dehlendorf C, Park SY, Emeremni CA, Comer D, Vincett K, Borrero S (2014) Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women’s reproductive experiences, (in eng). Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM (2016) Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2015, (in eng). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65(44):1205–1211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brown AF et al (1999) Ethnic differences in hormone replacement prescribing patterns, (in eng). J Gen Intern Med 14(11):663–669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006) Racial and socioeconomic disparities in breastfeeding–United States, 2004, (in eng). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55(12):335–339Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim S, Dolecek TA, Davis FG (2010) Racial differences in stage at diagnosis and survival from epithelial ovarian cancer: a fundamental cause of disease approach, (in eng). Soc Sci Med 71:274–281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Du XL, Sun CC, Milam MR, Bodurka DC, Fang S (2007) Ethnic differences in socioeconomic status, diagnosis, treatment, and survival among older women with epithelial ovarian cancer, (in eng). Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:660–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barnholtz-Sloan JS et al (2002) Ethnic differences in survival among women with ovarian carcinoma, (in eng). Cancer 94:1886–1893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bower JK, Schreiner PJ, Sternfeld B, Lewis CE (2009) Black-White differences in hysterectomy prevalence: the CARDIA study, (in eng). Am J Public Health 99(2):300–307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM (2015) Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014, (in eng). NCHS Data Brief 219:1–8Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bandera EV et al (2016) Obesity, weight gain, and ovarian cancer risk in African American women, (in eng). Int J Cancer 139(3):593–600CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schildkraut JM et al (2014) A multi-center population-based case–control study of ovarian cancer in African-American women: the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), (in eng). BMC Cancer 14:688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schildkraut JM et al (2016) Association between body powder use and ovarian cancer: the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), (in Eng). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:1411–1417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pearce CL et al (2015) Population distribution of lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in the United States, (in eng). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24:671–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McLaughlin JR et al (2007) Reproductive risk factors for ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case–control study, (in eng). Lancet Oncol 8:26–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holschneider CH, Berek JS (2000) Ovarian cancer: epidemiology, biology, and prognostic factors, (in eng). Semin Surg Oncol 19:3–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    John EM, Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J (1993) Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of seven U.S. case–control studies. Epithelial ovarian cancer in black women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group, (in eng). J Natl Cancer Inst 85:142–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hoyo C et al (2005) Anthropometric measurements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk in African-American and White women, (in eng). Cancer Causes Control 16:955–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Park HK, Ruterbusch JJ, Cote ML (2017) Recent trends in ovarian cancer incidence and relative survival in the US by race/ethnicity and histologic subtypes, (in eng). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0290 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Falconer H, Yin L, Gronberg H, Altman D (2015) Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study, (in eng). J Natl Cancer Inst 107:410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gaitskell K, Green J, Pirie K, Reeves G, Beral V (2015) Tubal ligation and ovarian cancer risk in a large cohort: substantial variation by histological type, (in eng). Int J Cancer 138:1076–1084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ness RB, Dodge RC, Edwards RP, Baker JA, Moysich KB (2010) Contraception methods, beyond oral contraceptives and tubal ligation, and risk of ovarian cancer, (in eng). Ann Epidemiol 21:188–196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Miracle-McMahill HL et al (1997) “Tubal ligation and fatal ovarian cancer in a large prospective cohort study,” (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 145:349–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hankinson SE et al (1993) Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer. A prospective study, (in eng). JAMA 270:2813–2818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J (1992) Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case–control studies. II. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers in white women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group, (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 136:1184–1203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Irwin KL, Weiss NS, Lee NC, Peterson HB (1991) Tubal sterilization, hysterectomy, and the subsequent occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer, (in eng). Am J Epidemiol 134:362–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Booth M, Beral V, Smith P (1989) Risk factors for ovarian cancer: a case–control study, (in eng). Br J Cancer 60:592–598CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Zikan M, Dusek L (2011) Underlying mechanisms of ovarian cancer risk reduction after tubal ligation, (in eng). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:559–563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Erickson BK, Conner MG, Landen CN Jr (2013) The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer, (in eng). Am J Obstet Gynecol 209(5):409–414CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cheng W, Liu J, Yoshida H, Rosen D, Naora H (2005) Lineage infidelity of epithelial ovarian cancers is controlled by HOX genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract, (in eng). Nat Med 11:531–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vang R, Shih M (2012) Fallopian tube precursors of ovarian low- and high-grade serous neoplasms, (in eng). Histopathology 62:44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Massuger L, Roelofsen T, Ham M, Bulten J (2009) The origin of serous ovarian cancer may be found in the uterus: a novel hypothesis, (in eng). Med Hypotheses 74:859–861CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bowtell DD et al (2015) Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer, (in eng). Nat Rev Cancer 15:668–679CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Majek O, Dusek L (2010) Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis, (in eng). Hum Reprod Update 17:55–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chilvers CE, Pike MC, Taylor CN, Hermon C, Crossley B, Smith SJ (1994) General practitioner notes as a source of information for case-control studies in young women. UK National Case–Control Study Group, (in eng). J Epidemiol Commun Health 48:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chrissy McNamara
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Abbott
    • 2
  • Elisa V. Bandera
    • 3
  • Bo Qin
    • 3
  • Lauren C. Peres
    • 2
  • Fabian Camacho
    • 2
  • Patricia G. Moorman
    • 4
  • Anthony J. Alberg
    • 5
  • Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan
    • 6
  • Melissa Bondy
    • 7
  • Michele L. Cote
    • 8
  • Ellen Funkhouser
    • 9
  • Edward S. Peters
    • 10
  • Ann G. Schwartz
    • 8
  • Joellen M. Schildkraut
    • 2
  • Paul Terry
    • 11
    Email author
  1. 1.Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry, Georgia Department of Public HealthAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Population ScienceRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  4. 4.Department of Community and Family MedicineDuke Cancer InstituteDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health SciencesMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  6. 6.Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterCase Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandUSA
  7. 7.Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences Program, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  8. 8.Department of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA
  9. 9.Division of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  10. 10.Epidemiology ProgramLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public HealthNew OrleansUSA
  11. 11.Department of MedicineThe University of Tennessee Graduate School of MedicineKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations