Mammography rates after the 2009 revision to the United States Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation
In 2009, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against routine mammography screening for women aged 40–49 years. This revised recommendation was widely criticized and has sparked off intense debate. The objectives of this study are to examine the impact of the revised recommendation on the proportion of women receiving mammograms and how the effect varied by age.
We identified women who had continuous health insurance coverage and who did not have breast cancer between 2008 and 2011 in the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims Databases using mammogram procedure codes. Using women aged 50–59 years as a control group, we used a differences-in-differences approach to estimate the impact of the revised recommendation on the proportion of women ages 40–49 years who received at least one mammogram. We also compared the age-specific changes in the proportion of women ages 35–59 years who were screened before and after the release of the revised recommendation.
The proportion of women screened among the 40–49 and 50–59 age groups were 58.5 and 62.5%, respectively, between 2008 and 2009, and 56.9 and 62.0%, respectively, between 2010 and 2011. After 2009, the proportion of women screened declined by 1.2 percentage point among women aged 40–49 years (P < 0.01). The proportion of women screened decreased for all ages, and decreases were larger among women closer to the 40-year threshold.
The 2009 USPSTF breast cancer recommendation was followed by a small reduction in the proportion of insured women aged 40–49 years who were screened. Reductions were larger among women at the younger end of the age range, who presumably had less prior experience with mammography than women nearing 50.
KeywordsBreast cancer USPSTF Mammography screening Prevention guideline Claims data
- 2.US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician 65(12):2537–2544Google Scholar
- 10.Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D et al (2010) Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 7(1):18–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.American Cancer Society (2009) American Cancer Society Responds to Changes to USPSTF Mammography Guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 22]. http://pressroom.cancer.org/index.php?s=43&item=201
- 12.American College of Radiology (2009) USPSTF mammography recommendations will result in countless unnecessary breast cancer deaths each year [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 22]. http://www.acr.org/About-Us/Media-Center/Position-Statements/Position-Statements-Folder/USPSTF-Mammography-Recommendations-Will-Result-in-Countless-Unnecessary-Breast-Cancer-Deaths
- 13.Society of Breast Imaging (2009) ACR-SBI call for exclusion of USPSTF recommendations from healthcare reform Legislation [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 22]. http://sbi-online.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=119
- 15.Kiviniemi MT, Hay JL (2012) Awareness of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommended changes in mammography screening guidelines, accuracy of awareness, sources of knowledge about recommendations, and attitudes about updated screening guidelines in women ages 40-49 and 50+. BMC Public Health 12:899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Block LD, Jarlenski MP, Wu AW, Bennett WL (2009) Mammography use among women ages 40–49 after the, US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. J Gen Intern Med 2013:1–7Google Scholar
- 19.Wharam JF, Landon B, Zhang F, Xu X, Soumerai S, Ross-Degnan D. (2015) Mammography Rates 3 Years After the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines Changes. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 9 Feb 2015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667290
- 22.Thomson Reuters (2012) Thomson Reuters Marketscan Research Databases. Thomson Reuters, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 27.Burchill KTC. (2006) Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Macro-ICD9CM Codes [Internet]. 2006. http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/Upload/SAS/_ElixhauserICD9CM.sas.txt
- 30.Freeman JL, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Warren JL, Virnig BA, Cooper GS (2002) Measuring breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening with medicare claims data. Med Care 40(8):36–42Google Scholar