Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 811–819 | Cite as

Association between abortion and breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on prospective studies

  • Jun Guo
  • Yubei Huang
  • Lei Yang
  • Zhengqiang Xie
  • Shuhong Song
  • Juan Yin
  • Li Kuang
  • Wengang Qin
Original paper

Abstract

Objective

Although positive association between abortion and breast cancer was frequently reported from case–control studies, results from prospective studies were still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this association based on prospective studies.

Methods

PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and Embase were systematically searched for prospective studies on the association between abortion and breast cancer up to April 2014, supplemented by manual searches on the references. Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of included studies. Random effects models were used to estimate the combined relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs).

Results

Fifteen prospective studies [14 focused on induced abortion (IA), and 12 focused on spontaneous abortion (SA)] were included in the final analysis. The combined RRs (95 % CIs) of breast cancer risk were 1.00 (0.94–1.05) [1.00 (0.92–1.08) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.00 (0.94–1.05) for incidence-rate data] for IA, and 1.02 (0.95–1.09) [1.06 (0.96–1.16) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.01 (0.92–1.09) for incidence-rate data] for SA, respectively. Non-significant associations of breast cancer with IA and SA were also found among nulliparous women, women with abortion before or after the first full-term pregnancy, women with one or ≥2 abortions, and women with first abortion after 30 years old.

Conclusion

The current prospective evidences are not sufficient to support the positive association between abortion (including IA and SA) and breast cancer risk.

Keywords

Induced abortion Spontaneous abortion Breast cancer Prospective study Systematic review Meta-analysis 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

Supplementary material

10552_2015_536_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (52 kb)
Supplement Fig. 1. Sensitivity analysis of association of induced abortion with breast cancer risk after excluding the study with largest weight. Each row in the forest graph represents the original relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) reported in each study. And the last row represents the overall RR (95 % CI). Palmer (2004a) and Palmer (2004b) [Henderson (2008a) and Henderson (2008b)] represented the datasets for nulliparous women and parous women, respectively. (PPTX 52 kb)
10552_2015_536_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (52 kb)
Supplement Fig. 2. Sensitivity analysis of association of spontaneous abortion with breast cancer risk after excluding the study with largest weight. Each row in the forest graph represents the original relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) reported in each study. And the last row represents the overall RR (95 % CI). Hadjimichael (1986a) and Hadjimichael (1986b) represented the datasets for women with one parity and women with two and more parity, respectively. And Henderson (2008a) and Henderson (2008b) represented the datasets for nulliparous women and parous women, respectively. (PPTX 52 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Kvale G (1995) The short-term and long-term effect of a pregnancy on breast cancer risk: a prospective study of 802,457 parous Norwegian women. Br J Cancer 72:480–484CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Russo J, Russo IH (1980) Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol 100:497–512PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Russo J, Tay LK, Ciocca DR et al (1983) Molecular and cellular basis of the mammary gland susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect 49:185–199CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Russo J, Wilgus G, Russo IH (1979) Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis: I Differentiation of the mammary gland as determinant of tumor incidence and type of lesion. Am J Pathol 96:721–736PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brind J, Chinchilli VM, Severs WB et al (1996) Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:481–496CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang Y, Zhang X, Li W et al (2014) A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Causes Control 25:227–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beral V, Bull D, Doll R et al (2004) Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83 000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 363:1007–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldacre MJ, Kurina LM, Seagroatt V et al (2001) Abortion and breast cancer: a case-control record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:336–337CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Howe HL, Senie RT, Bzduch H et al (1989) Early abortion and breast cancer risk among women under age 40. Int J Epidemiol 18:300–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris BM, Eklund G, Meirik O et al (1989) Risk of cancer of the breast after legal abortion during first trimester: a Swedish register study. BMJ 299:1430–1432CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clavel-Chapelon F (2002) Cumulative number of menstrual cycles and breast cancer risk: results from the E3 N cohort study of French women. Cancer Causes Control 13:831–838CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clavel-Chapelon F (2002) Differential effects of reproductive factors on the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Results from a large cohort of French women. Br J Cancer 86:723–727CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sellers TA, Potter JD, Severson RK et al (1993) Difficulty becoming pregnant and family history as interactive risk factors for postmenopausal breast cancer: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Cancer Causes Control 4:21–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calle EE, Mervis CA, Wingo PA et al (1995) Spontaneous abortion and risk of fatal breast cancer in a prospective cohort of United States women. Cancer Causes Control 6:460–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lash TL, Fink AK (2004) Null association between pregnancy termination and breast cancer in a registry-based study of parous women. Int J Cancer 110:443–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brewster DH, Stockton DL, Dobbie R et al (2005) Risk of breast cancer after miscarriage or induced abortion: a Scottish record linkage case-control study. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:283–287CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newcomb PA, Mandelson MT (2000) A record-based evaluation of induced abortion and breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:777–781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang MT, Weiss NS, Malone KE (2000) Induced abortion in relation to breast cancer among parous women: a birth certificate registry study. Epidemiology 11:177–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Erlandsson G, Montgomery SM, Cnattingius S et al (2003) Abortions and breast cancer: record-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 103:676–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brauner CM, Overvad K, Tjonneland A et al (2013) Induced abortion and breast cancer among parous women: a Danish cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92:700–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hadjimichael OC, Boyle CA, Meigs JW (1986) Abortion before first livebirth and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 53:281–284CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Henderson KD, Sullivan-Halley J, Reynolds P et al (2008) Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California teachers study. Contraception 77:391–396CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lazovich D, Thompson JA, Mink PJ et al (2000) Induced abortion and breast cancer risk. Epidemiology 11:76–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Olsen JH et al (1997) Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 336:81–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Michels KB, Xue F, Colditz GA et al (2007) Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women: a prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 167:814–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Palmer JR, Wise LA, Adams-Campbell LL et al (2004) A prospective study of induced abortion and breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Causes Control 15:105–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paoletti X, Clavel-Chapelon F (2003) Induced and spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk: results from the E3 N cohort study. Int J Cancer 106:270–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reeves GK, Kan SW, Key T et al (2006) Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: Results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 119:1741–1745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ye Z, Gao DL, Qin Q et al (2002) Breast cancer in relation to induced abortions in a cohort of Chinese women. Br J Cancer 87:977–981CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andrieu N, Goldgar DE, Easton DF et al (2006) Pregnancies, breast-feeding, and breast cancer risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS). J Natl Cancer Inst 98:535–544CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brind J, Chinchilli VM (1997) Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 336:1834 (author reply 1835)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brind J, Chinchilli VM (2002) Abortion and breast cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:237–238CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brind J, Chinchilli VM (2004) Breast cancer and induced abortions in China. Br J Cancer 90:2244–2245 (author reply 2245-6)PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brind J, Chinchilli VM (2004) Abortions and breast cancer: record-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 109:945–946 (author reply 947-8)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brind J (2008) Breast cancer in relation to abortion: results from the EPIC study. Int J Cancer 122:960–961 (author reply 962)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brind J (2009) California Teachers Study report on incomplete pregnancy and breast cancer risk is flawed. Contraception 79:240 (author reply 240-1)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Russo J, Russo IH (1987) Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis. Lab Invest 57:112–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kelsey JL (1979) A review of the epidemiology of human breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1:74–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kelsey JL, Fischer DB, Holford TR et al (1981) Exogenous estrogens and other factors in the epidemiology of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 67:327–333PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Guo
    • 1
  • Yubei Huang
    • 2
  • Lei Yang
    • 3
  • Zhengqiang Xie
    • 1
  • Shuhong Song
    • 1
  • Juan Yin
    • 1
  • Li Kuang
    • 1
  • Wengang Qin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oncology, Dongfeng HospitalHubei University of MedicineShiyanChina
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsTianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and InstituteTianjinChina
  3. 3.Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and ControlPeking University Cancer Hospital and InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations