Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 1247–1259 | Cite as

Birthweight, early life body size and adult mammographic density: a review of epidemiologic studies

  • Laura YochumEmail author
  • Rulla M. Tamimi
  • Susan E. Hankinson
Review article

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the association between birth weight and early life body size with adult mammographic density in the peer-reviewed literature.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January, 2014. English language articles that assessed adult mammographic density (MD) in relation to early life body size (≤18 years old), or birthweight were included.

Results

Nine studies reported results for early life body size and %MD. Both exposure and outcome were assessed at different ages using multiple methods. In premenopausal women, findings were inconsistent; two studies reported significant, inverse associations, one reported a non-significant, inverse association, and two observed no association. Reasons for these inconsistencies were not obvious. In postmenopausal women, four of five studies supported an inverse association. Two of three studies that adjusted for menopausal status found significant, inverse associations. Birthweight and %MD was evaluated in nine studies. No association was seen in premenopausal women and two of three studies reported positive associations in postmenopausal women. Three of four studies that adjusted for menopausal status found no association.

Discussion

Early life body size and birthweight appear unrelated to %MD in premenopausal women while an inverse association in postmenopausal women is more likely. Although based on limited data, birthweight and %MD appear positively associated in postmenopausal women. Given the small number of studies, the multiple methods of data collection and analysis, other methodologic issues, and lack of consistency in results, additional research is needed to clarify this complex association and develop a better understanding of the underlying biologic mechanisms.

Keywords

Mammographic density Birthweight Childhood body size BMI 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR 126(6):1130–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7(12):1133–1144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S (2011) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res 13(6):223PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe M, Minkin S (2009) Mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 11(Suppl 3):S4PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, Little L, Minkin S, Yaffe M (2002) A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(10 Pt 1):1048–1053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1159–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jong R, Fishell E, Little L, Lockwood G, Boyd NF (1996) Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists’ classification. Eur J Cancer Prev 5(4):281–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Assi V, Warwick J, Cuzick J, Duffy SW (2011) Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9(1):33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettersson A, Graff R, Ursin G et al (2014) Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(5):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10(1):201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K et al (2005) Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 6(10):798–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stuedal A, Ma H, Bernstein L, Pike MC, Ursin G (2008) Does breast size modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(3):621–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pettersson A, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Tamimi RM (2011) Nondense mammographic area and risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 13(5):R100PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M (2008) Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 371(9612):569–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS et al (2000) Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 152(6):514–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiseman M (2008) The second world cancer research fund/american institute for cancer research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Proc Nutr Soc 67(3):253–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park MH, Falconer C, Viner RM, Kinra S (2012) The impact of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review. Obes Rev 13(11):985–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruder EH, Dorgan JF, Kranz S, Kris-Etherton PM, Hartman TJ (2008) Examining breast cancer growth and lifestyle risk factors: early life, childhood, and adolescence. Clin Breast Cancer 8(4):334–342PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xue F, Michels KB (2007) Intrauterine factors and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Lancet Oncol 8(12):1088–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Michels KB, Xue F (2006) Role of birthweight in the etiology of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 119(9):2007–2025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jeffreys M, Warren R, Gunnell D, McCarron P, Smith GD (2004) Life course breast cancer risk factors and adult breast density (United Kingdom). Cancer Causes Control 15(9):947–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolfe JN (1976) Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. Radiology 121(3 Pt 1):545–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gram IT, Bremnes Y, Ursin G, Maskarinec G, Bjurstam N, Lund E (2005) Percentage density, Wolfe’s and Tabar’s mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 7(5):R854–R861PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao J, Warren R, Warren-Forward H, Forbes JF (2008) Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108(1):121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39(10):1629–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lope V, Perez-Gomez B, Moreno MP et al (2011) Childhood factors associated with mammographic density in adult women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130(3):965–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rice MS, Bertrand KA, Lajous M et al (2013) Body size throughout the life course and mammographic density in Mexican women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138(2):601–610Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Samimi G, Colditz GA, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM (2008) Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the nurses’ health study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109(1):113–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sellers TA, Vachon CM, Pankratz VS et al (2007) Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity, and diet with adult mammographic breast density. Am J Epidemiol 166(4):456–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola BL et al (2003) Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort. Br J Cancer 89(5):852–859PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tseng M, Olufade TO, Evers KA, Byrne C (2011) Adolescent lifestyle factors and adult breast density in U.S. Chinese immigrant women. Nutr Cancer 63(3):342–349PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dorgan JF, Klifa C, Shepherd JA et al (2012) Height, adiposity and body fat distribution and breast density in young women. Breast Cancer Res 14(4):R107PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stunkard A, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1983) Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In: Kety S, Rowland L, Sidman S, Mathysee S (eds) The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Raven Press, New York, p 115Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Andersen ZJ, Baker JL, Bihrmann K, Vejborg I, Sorensen TI, Lynge E (2014) Birth weight, childhood body mass index and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 16(1):R4PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Biro FM, Wien M (2010) Childhood obesity and adult morbidities. Am J Clin Nutr 91(5):1499S–1505SPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tamimi RM, Eriksson L, Lagiou P et al (2010) Birth weight and mammographic density among postmenopausal women in Sweden. Int J Cancer 126(4):985–991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cerhan JR, Sellers TA, Janney CA, Pankratz VS, Brandt KR, Vachon CM (2005) Prenatal and perinatal correlates of adult mammographic breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(6):1502–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pearce MS, Tennant PW, Mann KD et al (2012) Life course predictors of mammographic density: the newcastle thousand families cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(1):187–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ekbom A, Thurfjell E, Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO (1995) Perinatal characteristics and adult mammographic patterns. Int J Cancer 61(2):177–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lokate M, van Duijnhoven FJ, van den Berg SW, Peeters PH, van Gils CH (2013) Early life factors and adult mammographic density. Cancer Causes Control 24(10):1771–1778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silva Idos S, De Stavola B, McCormack V, Collaborative Group on Pre-Natal Risk Factors and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer (2008) Birth size and breast cancer risk: re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 studies. PLoS Med 5(9):e193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Must A, Willett WC, Dietz WH (1993) Remote recall of childhood height, weight, and body build by elderly subjects. Am J Epidemiol 138(1):56–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kemp M, Gunnell D, Maynard M, Smith GD, Frankel S (2000) How accurate is self reported birth weight among the elderly? J Epidemiol Community Health 54(8):639PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Poole EM, Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE, Schernhammer ES, Pollak MN, Baer HJ (2011) Body size in early life and adult levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3. Am J Epidemiol 174(6):642–651PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pollak M (2012) The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer 12(3):159–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group, Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, Roddam AW (2010) Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol 11(6):530–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Guo YP, Martin LJ, Hanna W et al (2001) Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(3):243–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Byrne C, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Pollak M, Hankinson SE (2000) Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. Cancer Res 60(14):3744–3748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Boyd NF, Stone J, Martin LJ et al (2002) The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities. Br J Cancer 87(8):876–882PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rice MS, Tworoger SS, Rosner BA, Pollak MN, Hankinson SE, Tamimi RM (2012) Insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3, growth hormone, and mammographic density in the nurses’ health studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):805–812PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Savarese TM, Strohsnitter WC, Low HP et al (2007) Correlation of umbilical cord blood hormones and growth factors with stem cell potential: implications for the prenatal origin of breast cancer hypothesis. Breast Cancer Res 9(3):R29PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Baik I, Becker PS, DeVito WJ et al (2004) Stem cells and prenatal origin of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 15(5):517–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Trichopoulos D, Adami HO, Ekbom A, Hsieh CC, Lagiou P (2008) Early life events and conditions and breast cancer risk: from epidemiology to etiology. Int J Cancer 122(3):481–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Johnston PG, Rondinone CM, Voeller D, Allegra CJ (1992) Identification of a protein factor secreted by 3T3-L1 preadipocytes inhibitory for the human MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res 52(24):6860–6865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lokate M, Peeters PH, Peelen LM, Haars G, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH (2011) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the role of the fat surrounding the fibroglandular tissue. Breast Cancer Res 13(5):R103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heine JJ, Scott CG, Sellers TA et al (2012) A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(13):1028–1037PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pinker K, Perry N, Milner S, Mokbel K, Duffy S (2010) Validation of a new automated volumetric breast density measurement system as a marker of breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 12(Suppl 3):O1PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yaffe MJ (2008) Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 10(3):209PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S, Wasilauskas C, Pike MC, Ursin G (2003) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(1):30–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brisson J, Brisson B, Cote G, Maunsell E, Berube S, Robert J (2000) Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9(9):911–915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Toriola AT, Colditz GA (2013) Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: implications for prevention. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138(3):665–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(15):1170–1179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A et al (2005) Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 14(4):269–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ooms EA, Zonderland HM, Eijkemans MJ et al (2007) Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 16(6):568–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bernardi D, Pellegrini M, Di Michele S et al (2012) Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification. Radiol Med 117(4):519–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Byng JW, Boyd NF, Little L et al (1996) Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images. Eur J Cancer Prev 5(5):319–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabar L (1997) The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol 24(2):131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wolfe JN (1976) Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5):2486–2492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Yochum
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rulla M. Tamimi
    • 2
  • Susan E. Hankinson
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Channing Division of Network MedicineBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.University of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations