Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 171–177 | Cite as

Distance from residence to power line and risk of childhood leukemia: a population-based case–control study in Denmark

  • Camilla Pedersen
  • Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
  • Naja Hulvej Rod
  • Patrizia Frei
  • Aslak Harbo Poulsen
  • Christoffer Johansen
  • Joachim Schüz
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Epidemiological studies have found an association between exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and childhood leukemia. In 2005, a large British study showed an association between proximity of residence to high-voltage power lines and the risk of childhood leukemia. The association extended beyond distances at which the ‘power line’-induced magnetic fields exceed background levels, suggesting that the association was not explained by the magnetic field, but might be due to chance, bias, or other risk factors associated with proximity to power lines. Our aim was to conduct a comparable study in an independent setting (Denmark).

Methods

We included 1,698 cases aged <15, diagnosed with leukemia during 1968–2006, from the Danish Cancer Registry and 3,396 controls randomly selected from the Danish childhood population and individually matched by gender and year of birth. We used geographical information systems to determine the distance between residence at birth and the nearest 132–400 kV overhead power line.

Results

Odds ratios (ORs) were 0.76 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.45] for children who lived 0–199 m from the nearest power line and 0.92 (95 % CI 0.67–1.25) for those who lived 200–599 m away when compared with children who lived ≥600 m away. When restricting the analysis to 220 and 400 kV overhead power lines, the OR for children who lived 200–599 m from a power line was 1.76 (95 % CI 0.82–3.77) compared to children who lived ≥600 m away. However, chance is a likely explanation for this finding as the result was not significant, numbers were small, and there were no indications of an higher risk closer to the lines since no cases were observed within 200 m of these.

Conclusions

We found no higher risk of leukemia for children living 0–199 m or for children living 200–599 m of a 132–400 kV overhead power line. A slightly elevated OR for children living between 200 and 599 m of a 220–400 kV overhead power line is likely to be a chance finding.

Keywords

Childhood leukemia Power lines Electromagnetic fields Case–control study 

References

  1. 1.
    Wertheimer N, Leeper E (1979) Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 109:273–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, Roman E, Skinner J, Dockerty J, Linet M, McBride M, Michaelis J, Olsen JH, Tynes T, Verkasalo PK (2000) A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 83:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C, Kelsh MA (2000) A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group. Epidemiology 11:624–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2002) Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. In: Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans volume 80. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Crespi CM, Draper G, Hagihara J, Lowenthal RM, Mezei G, Oksuyan S, Schüz J, Swanson J, Tittarelli A, Vincetu M, Wunsch Filho V (2010) Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 103:1128–1135PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO (2007) Extremely low frequency fields. World Health Organization: Geneva (Environmental Health Criteria 238)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schüz J, Ahlbom A (2008) Exposure to electromagnetic fields and the risk of childhood leukaemia: a review. Radiat Prot Dosim 132:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Draper G, Vincent T, Kroll ME, Swanson J (2005) Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case–control study. BMJ 330:1290–1292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kroll ME, Swanson J, Vincent TJ, Draper GJ (2010) Childhood cancer and magnetic fields from high-voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case–control study. Br J Cancer 103:1122–1127PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maslanyj M, Simpson J, Roman E, Schüz J (2009) Power frequency magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukaemia: misclassification of exposure from the use of the ‘distance from power line’ exposure surrogate. Bioelectromagnetics 30:183–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kheifets L, Feychting M, Schüz J (2005) Childhood cancer and power lines: results depend on chosen control group. BMJ 331:635–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feychting M, Ahlbom A (1993) Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol 138:467–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olsen JH, Nielsen A, Schulgen G (1993) Residence near high voltage facilities and risk of cancer in children. BMJ 307:891–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tynes T, Haldorsen T (1997) Electromagnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Norwegian high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol 145:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McBride ML, Gallagher RP, Theriault G, Armstrong BG, Tamaro S, Spinelli JJ, Deadman JE, Fincham S, Robson D, Choi W (1999) Power-frequency electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia in Canada. Am J Epidemiol 149:831–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kleinerman RA, Kaune WT, Hatch EE, Wacholder S, Linet MS, Robison LL, Niwa S, Tarone RE (2000) Are children living near high-voltage power lines at increased risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia? Am J Epidemiol 151:512–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators (2000) Childhood cancer and residential proximity to power lines. UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. Br J Cancer 83:1573–1580PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sermage-Faure C, Demoury C, Rudant J, Goujon-Bellec S, Guyot-Goubin A, Deschamps F, Hemon D, Clavel J (2013) Childhood leukaemia close to high-voltage power lines—the Geocap study, 2002–2007. Br J Cancer 108:1899–1906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wunsch-Filho V, Pelissari DM, Barbieri FE, Sant’Anna L, de Oliveira CT, de Mata JF, Tone LG, Lee ML, de Andrea ML, Bruniera P, Epelman S, Filho VO, Kheifets L (2011) Exposure to magnetic fields and childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Cancer Epidemiol 35:534–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gjerstorff ML (2011) The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health 39:42–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raaschou-Nielsen O, Obel J, Dalton S, Tjønneland A, Hansen J (2004) Socioeconomic status and risk of childhood leukaemia in Denmark. Scand J Public Health 32:279–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feychting M, Kaune WT, Savitz DA, Ahlbom A (1996) Estimating exposure in studies of residential magnetic fields and cancer: importance of short-term variability, time interval between diagnosis and measurement, and distance to power line. Epidemiology 7:220–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camilla Pedersen
    • 1
  • Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
    • 1
  • Naja Hulvej Rod
    • 2
  • Patrizia Frei
    • 1
  • Aslak Harbo Poulsen
    • 1
  • Christoffer Johansen
    • 1
  • Joachim Schüz
    • 3
  1. 1.Danish Cancer Society Research CenterCopenhagen ØDenmark
  2. 2.Social Medicine Section, Department of Public HealthUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  3. 3.Section of Environment and RadiationInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyon Cedex 08France

Personalised recommendations