Marijuana use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study
- 7.7k Downloads
Cannabis (marijuana) smoke and tobacco smoke contain many of the same potent carcinogens, but a critical—yet unresolved—medical and public-health issue is whether cannabis smoking might facilitate the development of lung cancer. The current study aimed to assess the risk of lung cancer among young marijuana users.
A population-based cohort study examined men (n = 49,321) aged 18–20 years old assessed for cannabis use and other relevant variables during military conscription in Sweden in 1969–1970. Participants were tracked until 2009 for incident lung cancer outcomes in nationwide linked medical registries. Cox regression modeling assessed relationships between cannabis smoking, measured at conscription, and the hazard of subsequently receiving a lung cancer diagnosis.
At the baseline conscription assessment, 10.5 % (n = 5,156) reported lifetime use of marijuana and 1.7 % (n = 831) indicated lifetime use of more than 50 times, designated as “heavy” use. Cox regression analyses (n = 44,284) found that such “heavy” cannabis smoking was significantly associated with more than a twofold risk (hazard ratio 2.12, 95 % CI 1.08–4.14) of developing lung cancer over the 40-year follow-up period, even after statistical adjustment for baseline tobacco use, alcohol use, respiratory conditions, and socioeconomic status.
Our primary finding provides initial longitudinal evidence that cannabis use might elevate the risk of lung cancer. In light of the widespread use of marijuana, especially among adolescents and young adults, our study provides important data for informing the risk–benefit calculus of marijuana smoking in medical, public-health, and drug-policy settings.
KeywordsMarijuana use Lung cancer Cohort Incidence Tobacco Swedish conscripts
This research was supported indirectly by an institutional grant (which helped to provide salary support for Dr. Russell C. Callaghan, PhD) from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH). The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care did not have any role in the study design, analyses, interpretation of results, manuscript preparation, or approval to submit the final version of the manuscript for publication. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the Ministry. This work was also funded by a research grant from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS 2009-1611 to PA), which helped to provide salary support for Dr. Anna Sidorchuk, MD, PhD. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analyses, manuscript preparation, or approval to publish.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2010) World drug report 2010 (United Nations Publication, Sales No. E.10.XI.13). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lunde AS, Lundeborg S, Lettenstrom GS, Thygesen L, Huebner J (1980) The person-number systems of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Israel. Vital Health Stat 2(84):1–59Google Scholar
- 32.Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Bias analysis. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (eds) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 345–380Google Scholar
- 39.StataCorp (2009) Stata statistical software: release 11. College Station, StataCorp LP, TXGoogle Scholar
- 49.Hibell B, Guttormsson U, Ahlström S et al (2012) The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries. The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs, LisbonGoogle Scholar
- 51.Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE (2011) Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
- 58.Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti FD, Versino E, Zambon A, Borraccino A, Lemma P (2005) School-based prevention for illicit drugs’ use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(2):003020Google Scholar
- 59.Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P (2010) Cannabis policy: moving beyond stalemate. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar