Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 861–871 | Cite as

Cancer treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions: which cancer survivors receive them?

Original paper

Abstract

Purpose

Medically underserved subgroups of survivors bear a disproportionate burden of cancer-related health problems. Treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions are one possible strategy to address disparities in cancer-related health among cancer survivors. However, it is not known which cancer survivors receive these documents. This paper sought to identify and describe patterns in the receipt of treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions.

Methods

Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System’s 2010 cancer survivorship module were used for this study. This study involved 6,897 adult cancer survivors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for associations between survivor’s demographic and cancer-related factors and receipt of treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions.

Results

Treatment summaries were received by 31 % of survivors. Demographic characteristics and type of health care provider were associated with treatment summaries (LR χ 2 (31) = 101.02, p < .001). Follow-up care instructions were received by 71 % percent of cancer survivors. Survivors’ demographic and cancer-related characteristics were associated with follow-up care instructions (LR χ 2 (31) = 231.51, p < .001). Written follow-up instructions were received by 66 % of survivors who reported receipt of follow-up instructions. Receipt of written follow-up instructions was associated with gender and age.

Conclusion

Demographic and cancer-related patterns exist in the receipt of treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions. These patterns map to documented gaps in survivor cancer-related outcomes. Research that tests associations between treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions and cancer-related health outcomes is needed.

Keywords

Cancer survivorship Disparities Follow-up care instructions Treatment summaries 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported generously by the American Cancer Society Post-Doctoral Fellowship Grant #PFT-10-111-01-CPPB.

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Howlader N et al (2010) Improved estimates of cancer-specific survival rates from population-based data. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(20):1584–1598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Society AC (2012) Cancer facts and figures, 2012. Atlanta, American Cancer SocietyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parry C et al (2011) Cancer survivors: a booming population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 20(10):1996–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Askoxylakis V et al (2010) Long-term survival of cancer patients compared to heart failure and stroke: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 10:105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stein KD, Syrjala KL, Andrykowski MA (2008) Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer 112(11 Suppl):2577–2592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edgington A, Morgan M (2011) Looking beyond recurrence: comorbidities in cancer survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs 15(1):E3–E12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mariotto AB et al (2007) Multiple cancer prevalence: a growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16(3):566–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schootman M et al (2010) National estimates of racial disparities in health status and behavioral risk factors among long-term cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. Cancer Causes Control 21(9):1387–1395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aziz N, Rowland J (2003) Trends and advances in cancer survivorship research: challenge and opportunity. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):248–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Byers TE et al (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the national program of cancer registries patterns of care study. Cancer 113(3):582–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panel PSC (2004) Living beyond cancer: finding a new balance, 2003–2004 Annual reportGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. In: Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall (eds). The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ganz PA, Casillas J, Hahn EE (2008) Ensuring quality care for cancer survivors: implementing the survivorship care plan. Semin Oncol Nurs 24(3):208–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Underwood JM, Townsend JS, Steweart SL, Buchannan N, Ekwueme DU, Hawkins NA, Li J, Peaker B, Polack LA, Richards TB, Rim SH et al (2012) Surveillance of demographic characteristics and health behaviors among adult cancer survivors–Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2009. MMWR 61(1): 1–23Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sabatino S et al. (2012) Receipt of cancer treatment summaries and follow-up instructions among adult cancer survivors: results from a national survey. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 1–12Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS (2006) Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 24(32):5117–5124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ayanian JZ et al (2005) Patients’ perceptions of quality of care for colorectal cancer by race, ethnicity, and language. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6576–6586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mokdad AH (2009) The behavioral risk factors surveillance system: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Public Health 30:43–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burris JL, Andrykowski MA (2011) Physical and mental health status and health behaviors of survivors of multiple cancers: a national, population-based study. Ann Behav Med 42(3):304–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Society AC (2012) Facts and figures, A.C. Society, Editor: AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Du XL et al (2011) Effects of individual-level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival: findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, 1979–2003. Cancer 117(14):3242–3251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stricker CT et al (2011) Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv 5(4):358–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haynes MA, Smedley BD, (1999) The unequal burden of cancer, Institute of Medicine, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, SEER Cancer statistics review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), in SEER Cancer statistics review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations) 2012, National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bellizzi KM, Miller MF, Arora NK, Rowland JH (2007) Positive and negative life changes experienced by survivors of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Behav Med 34(2):188–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mitka M (2012) Young adult cancer survivors face barriers to receiving primary care. JAMA 308(16):1618–1619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirchhoff AC et al (2012) Limitations in health care access and utilization among long-term survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer. Cancer 118(23):5964–5972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Castellino SM et al (2005) Minority adult survivors of childhood cancer: a comparison of long-term outcomes, health care utilization, and health-related behaviors from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6499–6507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Merport A et al (2012) The use of cancer treatment summaries and care plans among Massachusetts physicians. Support Care Cancer 20(7):1579–1583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Snyder CF et al (2008) Trends in follow-up and preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med 23(3):254–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pakilit AT, Kahn BA, Petersen L, Abraham LS, Greendale GA, Ganz PA (2007) Making effective use of tumor registries for cancer survivorship research. Cancer 92:1305–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grunfeld E, Earle CC (2010) The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010(40):25–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, Joy AA, Provencher L, Rayson D, Rheaume DE, Porter GA, Paszat LF, Pritchard KI, Robidoux A, Smith S, Sussman J, Dent S, Sisler J, Wiernikowski J, Levine MN (2011) Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community Health SciencesBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community Health SciencesBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations