How can we make cancer survival statistics more useful for patients and clinicians: An illustration using localized prostate cancer in Sweden
- 778 Downloads
Studies of cancer patient survival typically report relative survival or cause-specific survival using data from patients diagnosed many years in the past. From a risk-communication perspective, such measures are suboptimal for several reasons; their interpretation is not transparent for non-specialists, competing causes of death are ignored and the estimates are unsuitable to predict the outcome of newly diagnosed patients. In this paper, we discuss the relative merits of recently developed alternatives to traditionally reported measures of cancer patient survival.
In a relative survival framework, using a period approach, we estimated probabilities of death in the presence of competing risks. To illustrate the methods, we present estimates of survival among 23,353 initially untreated, or hormonally treated men with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer using Swedish population-based data.
Among all groups of newly diagnosed patients, the probability of dying from prostate cancer, accounting for competing risks, was lower compared to the corresponding estimates where competing risks were ignored. Accounting for competing deaths was particularly important for patients aged more than 70 years at diagnosis in order to avoid overestimating the risk of dying from prostate cancer.
We argue that period estimates of survival, accounting for competing risks, provide the tools to communicate the actual risk that cancer patients, diagnosed today, face to die from their disease. Such measures should offer a more useful basis for risk communication between patients and clinicians and we advocate their use as means to answer prognostic questions.
KeywordsRelative survival Prostate cancer Competing risks Period analysis Population based
This project was made possible by the continuous work of the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden steering group: Pär Stattin chair, Anders Widmark, Stefan Carlsson, Magnus Törnblom, Jan Adolfsson, Anna Bill-Axelson, Ove Andrén, David Robinson, Bill Pettersson, Jonas Hugosson, Jan-Erik Damber, Ola Bratt, Göran Ahlgren, Lars Egevad, and Mats Lambe. This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant number CAN 2010/676).
- 6.Adolfsson J, Garmo H, Varenhorst E, Ahlgren G, Ahlstrand C, Andren O, Bill-Axelsson BO, Damber JE, Hellström K, Hellström M, Holmberg E et al (2007) Clinical characteristics and primary treatment of prostate cancer in Sweden between 1996 and 2005. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2007(41):456–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2010) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology, Prostate cancer, Version 1.2010Google Scholar
- 8.D’Amico AV, Denham JW, Crook J, Chen MH, Goldhaber SZ, Lamb DS, Joseph D, Tai KH, Malone S, Ludgate C, Steigler A, Kantoff PW (2007) Influence of androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer on the frequency and timing of fatal myocardial infarctions. J Clin Oncol 25:2420–2425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Van Hemelrijck M, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Ingelsson E, Bratt O, Bill-Axelson A, Lambe M, Stattin P, Adolfsson J (2010) Absolute and relative risk of cardiovascular disease in men with prostate cancer: results from the Population-Based PCBaSe Sweden. J Clin Oncol 28:3448–3456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Lambert PC (2009) Further development of flexible parametric models for survival analysis. Stata J 9:265–290Google Scholar
- 23.Hinchliffe SR, Abrams KR, Lambert PC (2012) The impact of under and over-recording of cancer on death certificates in a competing risks analysis: a simulation study. Cancer Epidemiol (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.012
- 25.Finnish Cancer Registry-Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research (2009) Cancer in Finland 2006 and 2007. Helsinki 2009. Publication No. 76Google Scholar
- 27.Feuer EJ, Lee M, Mariotto AB, Cronin KA, Scoppa S, Penson DF et al (2012) The Cancer Survival Query System: making survival estimates from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program more timely and relevant for recently diagnosed patients. Cancer 118:5652–5662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Lambert PC, Royston P (2009) Further development of flexible parametric models for survival analysis. Stata J 9:265–290Google Scholar