Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 23, Issue 10, pp 1607–1614

Smoke-free environments: age, sex, and educational disparity in 25 Argentinean cities

  • Veronica Schoj
  • Lorena Allemandi
  • Oscar Ianovsky
  • Manuel Lago
  • Mariela Alderete
Original paper

Abstract

Background

There is scarce evidence of secondhand smoke (SHS) and disparity in developing countries. We evaluated the relationship between socio-demographic variables and secondhand smoke-related factors in Argentina.

Methods

We conducted a randomized telephone survey (2008/2009) in 25 Argentinean cities. We included a sample of 160 respondents per city stratified by sex and age. We used different generalized multivariate regression models with a confidence interval of 95 % for the five outcome variables.

Results

We sampled 4,000 respondents, 52.2 % women, 36 % adolescents and young adults (15–29 years), 58 % ≥12 years of education, and 72.6 % nonsmokers. Support to 100 % smoke-free environment legislation was higher in older than in younger respondents, OR = 1.5 (IC: 1.2–2.0), and in people with higher education levels, OR = 1.2 (IC: 1.1–1.4). Exposure to SHS was significantly lower in men than in women at home and in public places, IRR = 0.7 (IC: 0.5–0.9) and IRR  = 0.8 (IC: 0.6–0.9), respectively. Older respondents reported lower exposure at home and in public places than adolescents and young adults, IRR = 0.6 (IC: 0.4–0.8) and IRR = 0.4 (IC: 0.3–0.5), respectively. People with higher education levels had a higher level of exposure in indoor public places than less educated people, IRR = 1.1 (IC: 1.1–1.2). Knowledge of respiratory disease in children caused by SHS exposure was lower in men than in women, RRR = 0.3 (IC: 0.1–0.6). Perceived compliance was higher in men than in women, OR = 1.4 (IC: 1.1–1.8) and in people with higher education levels, OR = 1.2 (IC: 1.1–1.4). Older and more educated respondents were more empowered than. younger and less educated people, OR = 1.5 (IC: 1.2–1.9) and OR = 1.2 (IC: 1.1–1.3), respectively. Reference groups for each variable were age: 15–29; education: ≤7 years; and sex: men.

Conclusions

This is the first study to explore socio-demographic variables regarding secondhand smoke in our country. Women and younger people are more vulnerable to SHS-related factors in Argentina.

Keywords

Secondhand smoke Occupational exposure Smoke-free environment legislation 

References

  1. 1.
    US Department of Health and Human Services (2006) The Health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Human and Health Services, Atlanta, GA. CDC. Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/report. Accessed July 7, 2011
  2. 2.
    Constant C, Sampaio I, Negreiro F, Aguiar P, Silva A, Salgueiro M et al (2011) Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and respiratory morbidity in school age children. Rev Port Pneumol 17(1):20–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brennan P, Buffler PA, Reynolds P, Wu AH, Wichmann HE, Agudo A et al (2004) Secondhand smoke exposure in adulthood and risk of lung cancer among never smokers: a pooled analysis of two large studies. Int J Cancer 109(1):125–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Parent ME, Hanley JA (2000) Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 27(1):3–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control, Vol. 13: evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies (2009) Lyon, France. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/prev/handbook13/handbook13.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2011
  6. 6.
    Kligerman S, White C (2011) Epidemiology of lung cancer in women: risk factors, survival, and screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(2):287–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Chrysohoou C, Skoumas J, Tzioumis K, Stefanadis C et al (2002) Association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the development of acute coronary syndromes: the CARDIO2000 case–control study. Tob Control 11(3):220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonita R, Duncan J, Truelsen T, Jackson RT, Beaglehole R (1999) Passive smoking as well as active smoking increases the risk of acute stroke. Tob Control 8(2):156–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iribarren C, Darbinian J, Klatsky AL, Friedman GD (2004) Cohort study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and risk of first ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Neuroepidemiology 23(1–2):38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oono IP, Mackay DF, Pell JP (2011) Meta-analysis of the association between secondhand smoke exposure and stroke. J Public Health (Oxf) PMID: 21422014. (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luo J, Margolis KL, Wactawski-Wende J, Horn K, Messina C, Stefanick ML et al. (2011) Association of active and passive smoking with risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. BMJ: Br Med J 342Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker JM, Chou R, Hyland A, Peterson KK, Bauer UE (2005) Changes in hospitality workers’ exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York’s smoke-free law. Tob Control 14(4):236–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hahn EJ, Rayens MK, York N, Okoli CT, Zhang M, Dignan M et al (2006) Effects of a smoke-free law on hair nicotine and respiratory symptoms of restaurant and bar workers. J Occup Environ Med 48(9):906–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sargent RP, Shepard RM, Glantz SA, Barone-Adesi F, Vizzini L, Merletti F et al (2004) Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study. BMJ 328(7446):977–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA, Schembri S, Al-Khairalla MZ, Barnes M et al (2006) Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places. JAMA 296(14):1742–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larsson M, Boethius G, Axelsson S, Montgomery SM (2008) Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and health effects among hospitality workers in Sweden–before and after the implementation of a smoke-free law. Scand J Work Environ Health 34(4):267–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schoj V, Alderete M, Ruiz E, Hasdeu S, Linetsky B, Ferrante D (2010) The impact of a 100 % smoke-free law on the health of hospitality workers from the city of Neuquen, Argentina. Tob Control 19:134–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lightwood JM, Glantz S (2009) Declines in acute myocardial infarction after smoke-free laws and individual risk attributable to secondhand smoke. Circulation 120(14):1373–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meyers DG, Neuberger JS, He J (2009) Cardiovascular effect of bans on smoking in public places: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(14):1249–1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herman PM, Walsh ME (2011) Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, and asthma after implementation of Arizona’s comprehensive statewide smoking ban. Am J Public Health 101:491–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mackay D, Haw S, Ayres J, Fischbacher C, Pell J (2010) Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for childhood asthma. N Engl J Med 363:1139–1145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hackshaw AK, Law MR, Wald NJ (1997) The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ 315:980–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wipfli H, Avila-Tang E, Navas-Acien A (2008) Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries. Am J Public Health 98:672–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greaves LJ, Hemsing NJ (2009) Sex, gender, and secondhand smoke policies: implications for disadvantaged women. Am J Prev Med 27(2 suppl):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moore RS, Lee JP, Antin TMJ, Martin SE (2006) Tobacco free workplace policies and low SES female bartenders in San Francisco. J Epidemiol Commun Health 60(suppl 2):51–56Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rushton L, Bagga S, Bevan R, Brown TP, Cherrie JW, Holmes P et al (2010) Occupation and cancer in Britain. Br J Cancer 102(9):1428–1437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shavers VL, Fagan P, Alexander LA, Clayton R, Doucet J, Baezconde-Garbanati L (2006) Workplace and home smoking restrictions and racial/ethnic variation in the prevalence and intensity of current cigarette smoking among women by poverty status, TUS-CPS 1998–1999 and 2001–2002. J Epidemiol Commun Health 60(suppl 2):34–43Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tong EK, Tang H, Tsoh J, Wong C, Chen MSJ (2009) Smoke-free policies among Asian-American women: comparisons by education status. Am J Prev Med 37(2 suppl):144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh GK, Siahpush M, Kogan MD (2010) Disparities in children’s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007. Pediatrics 126(1):4–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    World Health Organization/Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2011) Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/WHO_FCTC_english.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2011
  31. 31.
    National Survey of Risk Factors (2010) Ministry of Health (Argentina). Available at: http://www.msal.gov.ar/ent/PDF/ENFR_2009_presentacion%20ppt.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2011
  32. 32.
    WHO/GYTS Global Youth Tobacco Survey (2011). Accessed Mar 5, 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/gyts/en/
  33. 33.
    Champagne BM, Sebrié EM, Schargrodsky H, Pramparo P, Boissonnet C, Wilson E (2010) Tobacco smoking in seven Latin American cities: the CARMELA study. Tob Control 19(6):457–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    National Institute of Statistics and Census of Argentina (2011) Available at: http://www.indec.mecon.gov.ar/. Accessed 2 Aug 2011
  35. 35.
    WHO/GATS (Global Adult Tobacco Survey) (2011) Available at: http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/gats/en/index.html. Accessed 20 July 2011
  36. 36.
    National Survey of Risk Factors (2005) Ministry of Health, Argentina. Available at: http://www.msal.gov.ar/htm/site_tabaco/pdf/13_Tabaco.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2011
  37. 37.
    Barnoya J, Glantz SA (2005) Cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke: nearly as large as smoking. Circulation 111Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moore RS, Annechino RM, Lee JP (2009) Unintended consequences of smoke-free bar policies for low-SES women in three California Counties. Am J Prev Med 37(2S):138–143Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Moore RS, McLellan DL, Tauras JA, Fagan P (2009) Securing the health of disadvantaged women. A critical investigation of tobacco-control policy effects on women worldwide. Am J Prev Med 37(2S):117–120Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Greaves L, Jategaonkar N (2006) Tobacco policies and vulnerable girls and women: toward a framework for gender sensitive policy development. J Epidemiol Commun Health 60(2S):57–65Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schoj V, Sebrie E, Pizarro M, Hyland A, Travers MJ (2010) Informing effective smoke-free policies in Argentina: air quality monitoring study in 15 cities (2007–2009). Salud Publica Mex 52(suppl 2)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robinson J, Ritchie D, Amos A, Cunningham-Burley S, Greaves L, Martin C (2010) Waiting until they got home’: gender, smoking and tobacco exposure in households in Scotland. Soc Sci Med 71(5):884–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Adult tobacco survey, 19 States, 2003–2007, surveillance summaries. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5903a1.htm. Accessed 22 June 2011. 59(SS–S3)
  44. 44.
    Groves RM (2006) Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Quart 70(5):646–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Keeter S, Kennedy C, Dimock M, Best J, Craighill P (2006) Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opin Quart 70(5):759–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Navas-Acien A, Peruga A, Breysse P, Zavaleta A, Blanco-Marquizo A, Pitarque R et al (2004) Secondhand tobacco smoke in public places in Latin America, 2002–2003. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 291(22):2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hyland A, Travers MJ, Dresler C, Higbee C, Cummings KM (2008) A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places. Tob Control 17(3):159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronica Schoj
    • 1
  • Lorena Allemandi
    • 1
  • Oscar Ianovsky
    • 1
  • Manuel Lago
    • 1
  • Mariela Alderete
    • 1
  1. 1.Fundación InterAmericana del Corazón-Argentina (FIC-Argentina)Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations