Dual effect of short interval between first and second birth on ductal breast cancer risk in Finland
- 212 Downloads
A short interval between the first and second birth was associated with an increased risk of advanced ductal breast cancer among women with 5+ childbirths in our previous study. We now evaluated the significance of this risk factor and its relation to the age at first birth among mothers with 2–4 children.
The cohort of 190,949 Finnish women with 2–4 children comprised 3,834 women with ductal breast cancer diagnosed before 2009. Conditional logistic regression for case–control design nested within the cohort was used to estimate proportional hazard ratios (HR) associated with the birth interval. Controls were matched for age and number of children. Age at the first birth and the interval from the last birth to cancer were co-variables.
Among women with the first birth <30 years, the HR of advanced ductal breast cancer at 50+ years for a short (<1.5 years) versus long (>3 years) interval between the first and second birth was 0.48 (95% Confidence Interval 0.33–0.70). Among women with the first birth at 30+ years, the HR of this cancer type diagnosed before the age of 50 years for a short versus long interval between the first and second birth was 5.83 (95% CI 2.30–14.8).
The interval between first and second birth strongly influences the risk of ductal breast cancer. Because second pregnancy soon after the first one decreased the risk of ductal breast cancer in young primiparas but increased the risk in older primiparas, it is likely that in such circumstances second pregnancy continues the actions initiated by the first pregnancy/breast-feeding.
KeywordsEtiology of breast cancer Risk factor Pregnancy Age at first birth Birth interval Interval from birth to cancer
- 9.Siwko SK, Dong J, Lewis MT, Liu H, Hilsenbeck SG, Li Y (2008) Evidence that an early pregnancy causes a persistent decrease in the number of functional mammary epithelial stem cells - implication for pregnancy-induced protection against breast cancer. Stem Cells 26:3205–3209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Pukkala E (2011) Biobanks and registers in epidemiological research of cancer. In: Dillner J (ed) Methods in biobanking. Methods in molecular biology, vol 675. Totowa, Humana Press, pp 61–112 doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-423-03
- 15.Mac Mahon B, Cole P, Lin M et al (1970) Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull WHO 43:209–221Google Scholar
- 34.Collaborative Group of Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50 302 women with breast cancer and 96 973 women without this disease. Lancet 360:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, Luostarinen T, Pukkala E et al (1999) Survival of cancer patients in Finland 1955–1994. Acta Oncol 38(Suppl 12):1955–1994Google Scholar