Maternal exposure to household chemicals and risk of infant leukemia: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group
- First Online:
- 263 Downloads
Utilizing data from the largest study to date, we examined associations between maternal preconception/prenatal exposure to household chemicals and infant acute leukemia.
We present data from a Children’s Oncology Group case–control study of 443 infants (<1 year of age) diagnosed with acute leukemia [including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML)] between 1996 and 2006 and 324 population controls. Mothers recalled household chemical use 1 month before and throughout pregnancy. We used unconditional logistic regression adjusted for birth year, maternal age, and race/ethnicity to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
We did not find evidence for an association between infant leukemia and eight of nine chemical categories. However, exposure to petroleum products during pregnancy was associated with AML (OR = 2.54; 95% CI:1.40–4.62) and leukemia without mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene rearrangements (“MLL−”) (OR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.47–4.93). No associations were observed for exposure in the month before pregnancy.
Gestational exposure to petroleum products was associated with infant leukemia, particularly AML, and MLL− cases. Benzene is implicated as a potential carcinogen within this exposure category, but a clear biological mechanism has yet to be elucidated.
KeywordsEpidemiology Infants Leukemia Chemical Prenatal
- 22.Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia p. 345–380Google Scholar
- 33.Lichter SR, Rothman S (1999) Environmental cancer–a political disease?, vol xiii. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 235Google Scholar
- 34.Harris SA (2007) Assessment of pesticide exposure for epidemiological research: measurement error and bias. In: Krieger RI, Ragsdale NN, Seiber JN (eds) Assessing exposures and reducing risks to people from the use of pesticides. American Chemical Society; Distributed by Oxford University Press, Washington, pp 173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar