Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 1763–1768

Microsatellite instability and survival in rectal cancer

  • Wade S. Samowitz
  • Karen Curtin
  • Roger K. Wolff
  • Sheryl R. Tripp
  • Bette J. Caan
  • Martha L. Slattery
Brief report

Abstract

Objective

High levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) have been associated in many studies with improved prognosis in colon cancer. Very few studies have evaluated the effect of MSI-H on rectal cancer survival. We assessed MSI-H and other genetic and epigenetic changes on survival of 990 individuals diagnosed with first primary rectal cancer.

Methods

MSI was assessed primarily by instability in the mononucleotide repeat BAT-26. The BRAF V600E mutation was assessed by TaqMan assay. The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) was determined by methylation-specific PCR of CpG islands in MLH1, methylated in tumors (MINT)1, (MINT)2, (MINT)31 and CDKN2A. KRAS2 codons 12 and 13 mutations, and TP53 mutations in exons 5–8 were determined by sequencing.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that MSI-H (HRR 2.47, 95% CI 1.13–5.40) and KRAS2 mutations (HRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04–1.81) were associated with a significantly higher risk of dying of rectal cancer. Only one of 22 MSI-H tumors showed a BRAF V600E mutation. Of 15 MSI-H rectal cancers evaluated for methylation, two exhibited MLH1 methylation and four exhibited CIMP.

Conclusion

The genetic and epigenetic characteristics of MSI-H rectal cancers suggest that they are enriched for Lynch-associated tumors; adverse prognosis associated with MSI-H in these tumors may reflect the relatively high frequency of Lynch-associated cancers and/or the effect of radiation or chemotherapy on Lynch-associated rectal cancers or MSI tumors in general.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Microsatellite instability Lynch syndrome Survival Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer 

Abbreviations

CIMP

CpG island methylator phenotype

HNPCC

Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

OR

Odds ratio

CI

Confidence interval

References

  1. 1.
    Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN et al (2001) Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancer is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:917–923PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lothe RA, Peltomäki P, Meling GI et al (1993) Genomic instability in colorectal cancer: relationship to clinicopathological variables and family history. Cancer Res 53:5849–5852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halling KC, French AJ, McDonnell SK et al (1999) Microsatellite instability and 8p allelic imbalance in stage B2 and C colorectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1295–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Popat S, Houlston RS (2005) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between chromosome 18q genotype, DCC status and colorectal cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer 41:2060–2070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smyrk TC (1994) Colon cancer connections: cancer syndrome meets molecular biology meets histopathology. Am J Pathol 145:1–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J et al (2005) Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers. Cancer Res 65:6063–6069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN et al (2002) Prognostic significance of p53 mutations in colon cancer at the population level. Int J Cancer 99:597–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Schaffer D et al (2000) Relationship of Ki-ras mutations in colon cancers to tumor location, stage, and survival: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:1193–1197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slattery ML, Potter J, Caan B et al (1997) Energy balance and colon cancer–beyond physical activity. Cancer Res 57:75–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slattery ML, Edwards SL, Palmer L et al (2000) Use of archival tissue in epidemiologic studies: collection procedures and assessment of potential sources of bias. Mutat Res 432:7–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spirio LN, Samowitz W, Robertson J et al (1998) Alleles of APC modulate the frequency and classes of mutations that lead to colon polyps. Nat Genet 20:385–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Herrick J et al (2005) Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer. Gastroenterology 129:837–845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Sweeney C et al (2006) Association of smoking, CpG Island methylator phenotype, and V600E BRAF mutations in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1731–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Issa JP, Shen L, Toyota M (2005) CIMP, at last. Gastroenterology 129:1121–1124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benlloch S, Paya A, Alenda C et al (2006) Detection of BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancer: comparison of automatic sequencing and real-time chemistry methodology. J Mol Diagn 8:540–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoang J-M, Cottu PH, Thuille B et al (1997) BAT-26, an indicator of the replication error phenotype in colorectal cancers and cell lines. Cancer Res 57:300–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Samowitz WS, Holden JA, Curtin K et al (2001) Inverse relationship between microsatellite instability and K-ras and p53 gene alterations in colon cancer. Am J Pathol 158:1517–1524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samowitz WS, Slattery ML (1997) Transforming growth factor-beta receptor type 2 mutations and microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Am J Pathol 151:33–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tripp SR, Gedge FEH, Lyon E et al (2004) Microsatellite instability testing by immunohistochemistry: initial evaluation of hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer and potential prognostic and therapeutic information. J Histotechnol 27:169–172Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colombino M, Cossu A, Manca A et al (2002) Prevalence and prognostic role of microsatellite instability in patients with rectal carcinoma. Ann Oncol 13:1447–1453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barnetson RA, Tenesa A, Farrington SM et al (2006) Identification and survival of carriers of mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes in colon cancer. N Engl J Med 354:2751–2763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Franchitto A, Pichierri P, Piergentili R et al (2003) The mammalian mismatch repair protein MSH2 is required for correct MRE11 and RAD51 relocalization and for efficient cell cycle arrest induced by ionizing radiation in G2 phase. Oncogene 22:2110–2120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barwell J, Pangon L, Hodgson S et al (2007) Biallelic mutation of MSH2 in primary human cells is associated with sensitivity to irradiation and altered RAD51 foci kinetics. J Med Genet 44:516–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tokairin Y, Kakinuma S, Arai M et al (2006) Accelerated growth of intestinal tumours after radiation exposure in Mlh1-knockout mice: evaluation of the late effect of radiation on a mouse model of HNPCC. Int J Exp Pathol 87:89–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carethers JM, Smith EJ, Behling CA et al (2004) Use of 5-fluorouracil and survival in patients with microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 126:394–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ribic CM, Sargent DJ, Moore MJ et al (2003) Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 349:247–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jover R, Zapater P, Castells A et al (2006) Mismatch repair status in the prediction of benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Gut 55:848–855CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ et al (2009) CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer. Gut 58(1):90–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slattery ML, Curtin K, Wolff RK et al (2009) A comparison of colon and rectal somatic DNA alterations. Dis Colon Rectum 52(7):1304–1311PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wade S. Samowitz
    • 1
  • Karen Curtin
    • 2
  • Roger K. Wolff
    • 2
  • Sheryl R. Tripp
    • 1
  • Bette J. Caan
    • 3
  • Martha L. Slattery
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Division of ResearchKaiser Permanente Medical Care ProgramOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations