Anthropometric characteristics and mammographic parenchymal patterns in post-menopausal women: a population-based study in Northern Greece
- 132 Downloads
To examine the effects of various anthropometric determinants on mammographic patterns at postmenopausal ages, accounting for reproductive differences.
Mammograms from 900 post-menopausal women classified into high- (P2/DY) versus low-density (N1/P1) groups using the Wolfe criteria were associated with changes in body figure, reported and measured height and weight, body mass index, hip, waist and chest circumferences, chest/hip ratio, waist/hip ratio (WHR), breast size, and leg length. Reproductive factors included ages at menarche, first pregnancy and menopause, years since menopause, parity, and breast feeding duration. The study was nested within a large cross-sectional survey of a population-based breast cancer screening program in Northern Greece.
Increasing chest circumference (p = 0.002), change in body build during adulthood to a heavier profile (p = 0.04), and heavy somatotype at age 18 (p = 0.007) were the anthropometric determinants significantly associated with low-density mammographic patterns.
Chest circumference as a measure of upper body fat adiposity appears to be a stronger determinant of mammographic patterns than body fat distribution (measured as WHR). A heavy body build in adulthood is associated with decreased mammographic density. Further studies are necessary to confirm our results, ideally prospective cohorts, looking at the effect of anthropometric determinants on mammographic pattern changes over time and breast cancer risk.
KeywordsMammographic parenchymal patterns Breast cancer Body build Chest circumference
The authors would like to thank the women of Halkidiki for their willingness in participating in this study as well as all members of the staff of the screening Center “Our Lady Who Loves Mankind” in Ormylia-Halkidiki.
- 7.Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabar L (1995) Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women. Br J Cancer 75:647–650Google Scholar
- 9.Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabar L (1997) Anthropometric indices in relation to mammographic patterns in peri-menopausal women. Int J Cancer 73:323–326. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971104)73:3<323::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Salminen T, Hakama M, Heikkila M, Saarenmaa I (1998) Favorable change in mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk factors. Int J Cancer 78:410–414. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981109)78:4<410::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Negri E, Braga C, LaVecchia C, Levi F, Talamini R, Franceschi S (1996) Lactation and the risk of breast cancer in an Italian population. Int J Cancer 67:161–164. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960717)67:2<161::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-R PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50,302 women with breast cancer and 96,973 women without the disease. Lancet 360:187–195. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09454-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1137Google Scholar
- 26.Sellers TA, Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Janney CA, Fredericksen Z, Brandt KR, Huang Y, Couch FJ, Kushi LH, Cerhan JR (2007) Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity and diet with adult mammographic breast density. Am J Epidemiol 166:456–464. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm112 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Riza E, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola B, Perry N, Karadedou-Zafiriadou E, Linos D, Remoundos DD, Linos A (2005) Correlates of high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns by menopausal status in a rural population in Northern Greece. Eur J Cancer 41(4):590–600. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.12.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Muñoz KA, Ballard-Barbash R, Graubard B, Swanson CA, Schairer C, Kahle LL (1996) Recall of body weight and body size estimation in women enrolled in the breast cancer demonstration and detection project (BCDDP). Int J Obes 20:854–859Google Scholar
- 32.Clayton D, Hills M (1993) Statistical models in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 261–281Google Scholar
- 43.Björkelund C, Lissner L, Andersson S, Lapidus L, Bengtsson C (1996) Reproductive history in relation to relative weight and body fat distribution. Int J Obes 20:213–219Google Scholar
- 52.Kumar NB, Lyman GH, Allen K, Cox CE, Shapira DV (1995) Timing of weight gain and breast cancer risk. Cancer 76:243–249. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<243::AID-CNCR2820760214>3.0.CO;2-R PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Shapira DV, Kumar NB, Lyman GH (1991) Estimate of breast cancer risk reduction with weight loss. Cancer 67:2622–2625. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910515)67:10<2622::AID-CNCR2820671037>3.0.CO;2-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Mc Cormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, dos Santos Silva I (2007) Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16(6):1148. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar