Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 273–281 | Cite as

The association between self-reported acrylamide intake and hemoglobin adducts as biomarkers of exposure

Original Paper



The validity of epidemiological studies assessing a lifetime cancer risk due to environmental factors, such as nutrition or smoking behavior strongly depends on the validity of the patient’s history.


This study assesses whether a standardized questionnaire is a valid tool to identify exposure with acrylamide by relating the self-reported food and smoking history with a biomarker, namely hemoglobin-adduct levels of acrylamide.


Objective parameters of previous exposure, such as hemoglobin-adduct levels of acrylamide and of the smoking-specific acrylonitrile, respectively, were related to self-reported data in 1,008 volunteers of the general population in bivariate analyses and a multiple linear regression analysis using the log-transformed biomarker levels as outcome.


Smoking was significantly associated with adduct levels of acrylamide (p < 0.0001) and had a main contribution to the internal burden with acrylamide. In cigarette smokers a strong correlation between the number of cigarettes smoked daily and the corresponding biomarkers was observed. Focusing on non-smokers (n = 828), a significant but weak correlation was found in bivariate analyses (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: 0.178 (95% CI: 0.089–0.268) in females and 0.168 (95% CI: 0.063–0.273) in males. A multiple linear regression analysis similarly yielded evidence of a significant association between the highest intake category and adduct levels; however, explained variability was very small (R2 = 0.08).


Self-reported data concerning smoking behavior were highly valid, while self-reported food intake is apparently not as useful for estimating food-related acrylamide exposure.


Acrylamide Exposure assessment Hemoglobin adducts Validity of self-reported data 


  1. 1.
    Tareke E, Rydberg P, Karlsson P, Eriksson S, Törnqvist M (2002) Analysis of acrylamide, a carcinogen formed in heated foodstuffs. J Agric Food Chem 50:4998–5006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rice JM (2005) The carcinogenity of acrylamide. Mut Resear 580:3–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calleman CJ, Wu Y, He F, Tian G, Bergmark E, Zhang S, Deng H, Wang Y, Crofton KM, Fennell T, Costa LG (1994) Relationship between biomarkers of exposure and neurological effects in a group of workers exposed to acrylamide. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 126:361–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mucci LA, Dickman PW, Steineck G, Adami H-O, Augustsson K (2003) Dietary acrylamide and cancer of the large bowel, kidney, and bladder: absence of an association in a population-based study in Sweden. Br J Cancer 88:84–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mucci LA, Dickman PW, Steineck G, Adami H-O, Augustsson K (2003) Letter to the editor. Reply. Dietary acrylamide and cancer risk: additional data on coffee. Br J Cancer 89:774–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mucci LA, Lindblad P, Steineck G, Adami HO (2004) Dietary acrylamide and risk of renal cell cancer. Int J Cancer 109:774–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mucci LA, Sandin S, Bälter K, Adami HO, Magnusson C, Weiderpass E (2005) Acrylamide intake and breast cancer risk in Swedish women. JAMA 293(11):1326–1327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mucci LA, Adami HO, Wolk A (2006) Prospective study of dietary acrylamide and risk of colorectal cancer among women. Int J Cancer 118:169–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pelucchi C, Franceschi S, Levi F, Trichopoulos D, Bosetti C, Negri E, La Vecchia C (2003) Fried potatoes and human cancer. Int J Cancer 105:558–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pellucchi C, Galeone C, Levi F, Negri E, Franceschi S, Salamini R, Borsetti C, Giocosa A, Vecchia CL (2006) Dietary acrylamide and human cancer. Int J Cancer 118:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doerge DR, Gamboa da Costa G, McDaniel LP, Churchwell MI, Twaddle NC, Beland FA (2005) DNA adducts derived from acrylamide and glycidamide to mice and rats. Mutat Res 580:131–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manière I, Godard T, Doerge D, Churchwell MI, Guffroy M, Laurentie M, Poul JM (2005) DNA damage and DNA adduct formation in rat tissues following oral administration of acrylamide. Mutat Res 580:119–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Männistö S, Virtanen M, Mikkonen T, Pietinen P (1996) Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in a case-control study on breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 49:401–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brunner E, Stallone D, Juneja M, Bingham S, Marmot M (2001) Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers. Br J Nutr 86:405–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D (2002) Development, validation and utilization of food-frequency questionnaires––a review. Public Health Nutr 5:567–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    BfR Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung: 2 Jahre Acrylamid – Eine Bilanz aus der Sicht der Risikobewertung, Stellungnahme vom 19.3.2004 (In German)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tworoger SS, Hankinsinson SE (2006) Use of biomarkers in epidemiologic studies: minimizing the influence of measurement error in the study design and analysis. Cancer Causes Control 17:889–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schettgen T, Weiss T, Drexler H, Angerer J (2003) A first approach to estimate the internal exposure to acrylamide in adults from Germany––smokers and non-smokers. Int J Hyg Environ Health 206(1):9–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schettgen T, Kütting B, Hornig M, Beckmann MW, Weiss T, Drexler H, Angerer J (2004) Trans-placental exposure of neonates to acrylamide – a pilot study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77(3):213–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Böning J (2004) Risikoverhalten im Umgang mit Suchtmitteln – Daten und Einblicke in die Behandlung. Gesundheitswesen 66:S71–S79 (In German)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calleman CJ (1996) The metabolism and pharmacokinetics of acrylamide: implications for mechanisms of toxicity and human risk. Drug Metab Rev 28:527–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hagmar L, Törnqvist M, Nordander C, Rosen I, Bruze M, Kautianinen A, Magnusson AL, Malmberg B, Aprea P, Granath F, Axmon A (2001) Health effects of occupational exposure to acrylamide using haemoglobin adducts as biomarkers of internal dose. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:219–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Decaprio PA (1997) Biomarkers: coming of age for environmental health and risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31:1837–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salvini S, Hunter DJ, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willet WC (1989) Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to week variation in food consumption. Int J Epidemiol 18:858–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pufulete M, Emery PW, Nelson M, Sanders TAB (2002) Validation of a short food frequency questionnaire to assess folate intake. Br J Nutr 87:383–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feskanich D, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Coldiztz GA, Stampfer MJ, Litin LB, Willet WC (1993) Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc 93:790–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Oockene IS, Ockene JK (1995) Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol 24:389–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang J, Temme EHM, Sasaki S, Kesteloot H (2000) Under- and overreporting of energy intake using urinary cations as biomarkers: relation to body mass index. Am J Epidemiol 152:453–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heitmann BL, Lissner L (1995) Dietary underreporting by obese individuals––is it specific or non-specific? Br Med J 311:986–989Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lafay L, Mennen L, Basdevant A, Charles MA, Borys JM, Eschwege E, Romon M (2000) Does energy intake underreporting involve all kinds of food or only specific food items. Results from the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante (FLVS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24:1500–1506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johnson RK, Goran MI, Poehlman ET (1994) Correlates of over-and underreporting of energy intake in healthy older men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 59:1286–1290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson RK, Soultanaskis RP, Matthews DE (1998) Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labelled water study. J Am Diet Assoc 98:1136–1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Myers R, Klesges RC, Eck LH, Hanon CL, Klem ML (1988) Accuracy of self-reports of food intake in obese and normal-weight individuals: effect of obesity on self-reports of dietary intake in adult females. Am J Clin Nutr 48:1248–1251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lissner L, Habich JP, Strupp BJ, Levitsky DA, Haas JD, Roe DA (1989) Body composition and energy intake: do overweight women overeat and underreport? Am J Clin Nutr 49:320–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lichtman SW, Pisarka K, Berman ER, Pestone M, Dowling H, Offenbacher E, Weisel H, Heska S, Matthews DE, Heymsfield SB (1992) Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N Engl J Med 327:1893–1898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schaefer EJ, Augustin JL, Schaefer MM, Rasmussen H, Ordovas JM, Dallal GE, Dwyer JT (2000) Lack of efficacy of a food-frequency questionnaire in assessing dietary macronutrient intakes in subjects consuming diets of known composition. Am J Clin Nutr 71:746–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bingham SA (1991) Validation of dietary assessment through biomarkers. Biomarkers of dietary exposure. In: Kok AP, van’t Veer P (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd meeting on nutritional epidemiology, Smith-Gordon, London pp 41–52Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hagmar L, Wirfällt E, Paulsson B, Törnqvist M (2005) Differences in hemoglobin adduct levels of acrylamide in the general population with respect to dietary intake, smoking habits and gender. Mut Res 580:157–165Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pechacek TF, Fox BH, Murray DM, Luepker RV (1984) Measurement of adolescent smoking behaviour: rationale and methods. J Behav Med 7:123–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Klesges RC, Debon M, Ray JW (1995) Are self-reports of smoking rate biased? Evidence from the second national health and nutrition examination survey. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1225–1233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lewis-Esquerre JM, Colby SM, O’Leary Tevyaw TT, Eaton CA, Kahler CW, Monti PM (2005) Validation of the timeline follow-back in assessment of adolescents smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 79:33–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bowlin SJ, Morrill BD, Nafziger AN, Lewis C, Pearson TA (1996) Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors using dual response: the behavioral risk factor survey. J Clin Epidemiol 49:511–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgitta Kütting
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Uter
    • 2
  • Hans Drexler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social and Environmental MedicineFriedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and EpidemiologyFriedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations