Colorectal cancer screening among Latinos from U.S. cities along the Texas–Mexico border
- 431 Downloads
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are comparatively low for U.S. Hispanics. To learn more about the factors influencing CRC screening among Hispanics living along the U.S.–Mexico border, 12 focus groups were conducted with Hispanic men and women aged 50 years and older in three Texas counties; Cameron County (Brownsville), Webb County (Laredo), and El Paso County, (El Paso). The focus group guide contained questions about health care behavior, knowledge about CRC, experiences with cancer, and factors that influence CRC screening. A total of 92 individuals participated with the majority aged 50–69 (75%). Twenty percent were born in the United States and 51% had lived in the United States for more than 20 years. Participants had low levels of education, income, and insurance coverage. The analysis revealed several overarching and contextual themes relating to knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and emotions about cancer and CRC screening. A prevalent theme that emerged from all groups was frustration and a lack of confidence in the U.S. healthcare system. Few participants had been advised by their providers to obtain CRC screening. Lack of patient knowledge about colorectal cancer and screening appeared to be a critical factor influencing screening. Themes about death and pain due to cancer were prevalent as were cultural factors such as machismo and embarrassment. System level barriers such as cost, medical insurance and transportation also impacted screening. These findings suggest that strategies are needed to educate Hispanic residents of border communities about CRC and to motivate them to undergo CRC screening.
KeywordsColorectal cancer Hispanics Health literacy Qualitative research Cancer screening
This study was funded by cooperative agreements (CDC PRC SIP 2-02U48 CCU6009653, CDC PRC SIP 16-04U48 CCU6009653, CDC PRC SIP 18-04U48 DCCU6009653). Dr. Vernon was supported by NCI CA97263 and CDC PRC SIP 19-04U48 DP000057. Dr. Bains was supported by NCI Grant U56-CA0999038.
- 2.Texas Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch TDoSHS. Cancer incidence data (2000 August) [cited 2006 Dec 19]; Available from: URL: http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/tcr/default.shtm
- 3.Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ et al (2007) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2004, Table I-26; Available from: URL: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/
- 6.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Guide to clinical preventive services, 2nd/3rd edn. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 8.Texas Department of State Health Services (2007) Texas behavioral risk factor surveillance system [cited 2007 July 1]; Available from: URL: http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/chs/brfss/query/brfss_form.shtm
- 22.Coronado GD, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W (2006) Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US–Mexico Border. Ethn Dis 6(2):421–427Google Scholar
- 25.U.S. Census Bureau. State and County QuickFacts. 2006 June 8 [cited 6 A.D. Dec 18]; Available from: URL: http://www.quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html
- 26.Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH (2006) Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 27.Fishbein M (1995) Developing effective behavior change interventions: some lessons learned from behavioral research. In: Backer TE, David SL, Soucy G (eds) Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (NIDA Research Monograph No. 155, NIH Publications No. 95-4035). National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, pp 246–261Google Scholar
- 29.Muhr T (2004) User’s manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 30.Fernandez ME, Wippold R, Byrd T, Longoria J (2007) Use of folk healing and home remedies among Mexican Americans living in three cities along the TX–Mexico border. Ref Type: Unpublished workGoogle Scholar