Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 655–663 | Cite as

Birthweight by gestational age and childhood cancer

Original Paper

Abstract

The objective of this research was to compare the association of birthweight alone with gender-specific birthweight-for-gestational age on childhood cancer risk in a large population-based case–control study in Germany. Incident cases of childhood cancer (n = 2,024, diagnosed 1992–1994) were ascertained from the German Childhood Cancer Registry. Controls were randomly drawn from population registries. Parents reported risk factor information in a mailed questionnaire and telephone interview. The odds ratio for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was 1.41 (95% confidence interval 1.08–1.84) in the high-birthweight category (>4 kg) and was 1.45 (1.07–1.97) in the large-for-gestational age (LGA) category compared to the normal birthweight (2.5–4 kg) and the appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) categories, respectively. However, the agreement between the birthweight and birthweight-for-gestational age was only moderate. Subgroup analyses revealed elevated odds ratios for ALL and CNS tumors in first born’s who were LGA but of normal birth weight. Thus, two findings from this post-hoc analysis are worthy of note: (1) the use of birthweight-for-gestation age categories within birthweight sub-groups potentially identified new high-risk groups among firstborns for ALL tumors and among all children for CNS tumors; and (2) although the magnitudes of risk estimators for ALL were comparable in the traditional high-birthweight group and in the LGA, the same children were not jointly classified in the same newborn categories indicating two potentially different subsets of children at risk.

Keywords

Birthweight Cancer etiology Childhood cancer Childhood leukemia Gestational age 

Abbreviations

ALL

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML

Acute myeloblastic leukemia

CNS

Central nervous system

NHL

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

OR

Odds ratio

CI

Confidence interval

AGA

Appropriate-for-gestational age

LGA

Large-for-gestational age

SGA

Small-for-gestational age

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank Dr Susanne Queißer-Luft (University of Mainz) and Klaus Schlaefer (German Cancer Research Center) for providing data from the Mainzer birth registry. Furthermore, the authors like to thank Drs Peter Kaatsch and Jörg Michaelis for the provision of the data of the German case–control study to perform these additional analyses.

References

  1. 1.
    Little J (1990) Epidemiology of childhood cancer. IARC Scientific Publications No149. Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ross JA, Perentesis JP, Robison LL, Davies SM (1997) Big babies and infant leukemia: a role for insulin-like growth factor-1? Cancer Causes Control 7:553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hjalgrim LL, Rostgaard K, Hjalgrim H et al (2004) Birth weight and risk for childhood leukemia in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Iceland. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1549–1556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hjalgrim LL, Westergaard T, Rostgaard K et al (2003) Birthweight as a risk factor for childhood leukemia: a meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemol 158:724–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schüz J, Kaletsch U, Meinert R, Kaatsch P, Michaelis J (2001) High birthweight and other risk factors for Wilms’ tumour: results of a population-based case-control study. Eur J Pediatr 160:333–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    von Behren J, Reynolds P (2003) Birth characteristics and brain cancers in young children. Int J Epidemiol 32:248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grassi AE, Giuliano MA (2000) The neonate with macrosomia. Clin Obstetr Gynecol 43:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Godfrey KM (2001) The ‘Gold Standard’ for optimal fetal growth and development. J Pedatri Endocrinol Metab 14:1507–1514Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kramer MS, Morin I, Yang H et al (2002) Why are babies getting bigger? Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. J Pediatr 141:538–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ventura SJ, Hamilton BE, Mathews TJ, Chandra A (2003) Trends and variations in smoking during pregnancy and low birth weight: evidence from the birth certificate, 1990–2000. Pediatrics 111:1176–1180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yerushalmy J (1967) The classification of newborn infants by birth weight and gestational age. J Pediatr 71:164–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schüz J, Kaatsch P, Kaletsch U, Meinert R, Michaelis J (1999) Association of childhood cancer with factors related to pregnancy and birth. Int J Epidemiol 28:631–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaatsch P, Haaf G, Michaelis J (1995) Childhood malignancies in Germany- methods and results of a nationwide registry. Eur J Cancer 31A:993–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voigt M, Schneider KTM, Jährig K (1996) Analyse des Geburtengutes des Jahrgangs 1992 der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Analysis of the total number of births in 1992 in the Federal Republic of Germany] (in German). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 56:550–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Voigt M, Schneider KTM, Friese K, Hesse V, Jährig K (1999) Analyse des Geburtengutes der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Teil 3: Perzentilwerte für das Geburtsgewicht, die Geburtslänge und den Kopfumfang deutscher Zwillinge (in German). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 59:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG (1995) Categorical data analysis using the SAS System. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brookmeyer R, Liang KY, Linet M (1986) Matched case-control designs and overmatched analyses. Am J Epidemiol 124:693–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1997) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bernstein L, Depue RH, Ross RK, Judd HL, Pike MC, Henderson BE (1986) Higher maternal levels of free estradiol in first compared to second pregnancy: early gestational differences. J Natl Cancer Inst 76:1035–1039PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bernstein L, Depue RH, Ross RK, Judd HL, Pike MC, Henderson BE (1986) Higher maternal levels of free estradiol in first compared to second pregnancy: early gestational differences. J Natl Cancer Inst 76:1035–1039PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu H, Rohan T (2000) Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1472–1489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lof M, Olausson H, Bostrom K, Janerot-Sjoberg B, Sohlstrom A, Forsum E (2005) Changes in basal metabolic rate during pregnancy in relation to changes in body weight and composition, cardiac output, insulin-like growth factor I, and thyroid hormones and in relation to fetal growth. Am J Clin Nutr 81:678–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chellakooty M, Vangsgaard K, Larsen T et al (2004) A longitudinal study of intrauterine growth and the placental growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I axis in maternal circulation: association between placental GH and fetal growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:384–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greaves M (2002) Childhood leukemia. BMJ 324:283–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castanon I, Baylies MK (2002) A Twist in fate: evolutionary comparison of Twist structure and function. Gene 287:11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kang Y, Massague J (2004) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell 118:277–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang J, Mani SA, Donaher JL et al (2004) Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumour metastasis. Cell 117:927–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pajer P, Pecenka V, Karafiat V, Kralova J, Horejsi Z, Dvorak M (2003) The twist gene is a common target of retroviral integration and transcriptional deregulation in experimental nephroblastoma. Oncogene 22:665–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Valsesia-Wittmann S, Magdeleine M, Dupasquier S et al (2004) Oncogenic cooperation between H-Twist and N-Myc overrides failsafe programs in cancer cells. Cancer Cell 6:625–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Entz-Werle N, Stoetzel C, Berard-Marec P et al (2005) Frequent genomic abnormalities at TWIST in human pediatric osteosarcomas. Int J Cancer May 117:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oram KF, Gridley T (2005) Mutations in snail family genes enhance craniosynostosis of Twist1 haplo-insufficient mice: implications for Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome. Genetics 170:971–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    de Heer IM, de Klein A, van den Ouweland AM et al (2005) Clinical and genetic analysis of patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1894–1902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schüz J (2003) Non-response bias as a likely cause for the association between young maternal age at the time of delivery and the risk of cancer in the offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 17:106–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schüz J, Spector LF, Ross JA (2003) Bias in studies of parental self-reported occupational exposures and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 158:710–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Linet MS, Wacholder S, Zahm SH (2003) Interpreting epidemiologic research: lessons from studies of childhood cancer. Pediatrics 112:218–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    von Kries R, Göbel U, Hachmeister A, Kaletsch U, Michaelis J (1996) Vitamin K and childhood cancer: a population based case-control study in Lower Saxony, Germany. BMJ 313:199–203Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaatsch P, Kaletsch U, Meinert R et al (1998) German case control study on childhood leukemia–basic considerations, methodology and summary of the results. Klin Padiatr 210:185–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Olson JE, Shu XO, Ross JA, Pendergrass T, Robison LL (1997) Medical record validation of maternally reported birth characteristics and pregnancy-related events: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. Am J Epidemiol 145:58–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Queisser-Luft A, Stolz G, Wiesel A, Schlaefer K, Spranger J (2002) Malformations in newborn: results based on 30,940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990–1998). Arch Gynecol Obstet 266:163–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cancer EpidemiologyDanish Cancer SocietyCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations