The black:white disparity in breast cancer mortality: the example of Chicago
- 459 Downloads
The black:white disparity in breast cancer mortality has been increasing in the U.S. In order to gain insight into this disparity in Chicago, we examined mortality data together with other important measures associated with breast cancer.
Trends in black:white female breast cancer mortality, incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mammography screening in Chicago were examined using data from the Illinois State Cancer Registry, Illinois Department of Public Health Vital Records, and the Illinois Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
The breast cancer mortality rate for black women in Chicago for 1999–2003 was 49% higher than that of white women, but the disparity is a recent phenomenon that is increasing rapidly. In 2003 the black rate was 68% higher than the white rate. Mortality rates were similar in the 1980’s and only started to diverge in the 1990’s as a result of a sharp improvement in mortality among white women contrasted with no improvement for black women. This lack of progress for black women is perplexing given that self-reported mammography screening rates have been the same for blacks and whites in Chicago since at least 1996 and that the early detection of breast cancer for black women has been increasing.
There has been no improvement in mortality from breast cancer for black women in Chicago in 23 years. This study, along with a review of the literature, lends support to the hypothesis that the disparities in breast cancer mortality are due to differential access to mammography, differential quality in mammography, and differential access to treatment for breast cancer. Fortunately, all three are amenable to intervention, which would help ameliorate this unacceptable disparity.
KeywordsBreast cancer Racial and ethnic disparities Mammography Stage
Many thanks to our colleague Jade Dell for her assistance in preparing this manuscript. Work on this paper was supported by funding from Illinois Department of Public Health, Stand Against Cancer Initiative, Grant #60180053.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2004) Breast cancer facts and figures, 2004. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
- 3.U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991) Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hoyert DL, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kung H (2006) Deaths: final data for 2003. National vital statistics reports: vol 54 no 13. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
- 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Office of Minority Health (Online) Eliminating racial & ethnic health disparities. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/omh/AboutUs/disparities.htm [accessed 11 July 2006]
- 12.National Cancer Institute (Online) NCI challenge goal 2015: eliminating the suffering and death due to cancer. Available from URL: http://www.cancer.gov/aboutnci/2015 [accessed 11 July 2006]
- 14.U.S. Census Bureau (Online) Census 2000, summary file 1. Generated by J Hirschman, using American FactFinder. Available from URL: http://factfinder.census.gov [accessed 11 July 2006]
- 15.Illinois Department of Public Health, Illinois State Cancer Registry (2004) Cancer incidence data 1986–2002; data as of November 2004Google Scholar
- 16.Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C (1990) International classification of diseases for oncology, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 18.Young JL Jr, Roffers SD, Ries LAG, Fritz AG, Hurlbert A (eds) (2001) SEER summary staging manual – 2001: codes and coding instructions. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. NIH Pub. No. 01-4969Google Scholar
- 19.ICD-9-CM Codebook 2001, 6th edn (2000) Vols 1, 2 & 3. St. Anthony’s Publishing, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
- 20.World Health Organization (2006) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, Version for 2006. Available from URL: http://www3.who.int/icd/currentversion/fr-icd.htm [accessed 11 July 2006]
- 21.Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Waller M, Leutzinger C, Condon K (1998) Objectives and design of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Paper presented at American Statistical Association National Meeting, Dallas TXGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al (eds) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2002. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Available from URL: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2002/. Based on November 2004 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2005 [accessed 11 July 2006]
- 23.Illinois Department of Public Health (Online) Cancer in Illinois: statistics. Available from URL: http://www.idph.state.il.us/cancer/statistics.htm. [accessed 11 July 2006]
- 30.McElroy JA, Remington PL, Gangnon RE, Hariharan L, Anderson LD (2006) Identifying geographic disparities in early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 3(1):1–8. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jan/05_0065.htm [accessed 14 June 2006]
- 31.Chiang CL (1961) Standard error of the age-adjusted death rate. Vital Stat Selected Rep 47:275–285Google Scholar
- 32.Rothman KJ (1986) Modern epidemiology. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
- 33.Keppel KG, Pearcy JN, Wagener DK (2002) Trends in racial and ethnic-specific rates for the Health Status Indicators: United States, 1990–98. In: Healthy people statistical notes. No. 23. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
- 40.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status – 35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002. MMWR 54:981–985Google Scholar
- 45.Caplan LS, McQueen DV, Qualters JR, Leff M, Garrett C, Calonge N (2003) Validity of women’s self-report of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population. Cancer Epi Bio Prev 12:1182–1187Google Scholar
- 51.Nass S, Ball J (eds) (2005) Improving breast imaging quality standards. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 54.NHS Breast Screening Programme (2003) Serving women for 15 years. Patnick J (ed). NHSBSP, Sheffield, England. Available from URL: www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk [accessed 17 July 2006]Google Scholar
- 55.Moss M, Steinhauer J (2002) “Mammogram clinic’s flaws highlight gaps in U.S. rules.” The New York Times 24:A1Google Scholar
- 56.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004) Breast cancer – screening data for assessing quality of services – New York, 2000–2003. MMWR 53(21):455–457Google Scholar
- 58.Smedley BA, Stith AY, Nelson AR (eds) (2003) Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 65.Digman J, Redmont C, Fisher B, Constantino J, Edwards B (1997) Prognosis among African-American women and white women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma: findings from two randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel project (NSABP). Cancer 80:80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 72.Li C, Daling J, Malone K (2003) Incidence of invasive breast cancer by hormone receptor status from 1992 to 1998. J Clin Oncol 22:47–53Google Scholar
- 73.Allen TW (1994) The invention of the white race. Verso Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar