Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 323–333 | Cite as

The black:white disparity in breast cancer mortality: the example of Chicago

  • Jocelyn Hirschman
  • Steven Whitman
  • David Ansell
Original Paper



The black:white disparity in breast cancer mortality has been increasing in the U.S. In order to gain insight into this disparity in Chicago, we examined mortality data together with other important measures associated with breast cancer.


Trends in black:white female breast cancer mortality, incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mammography screening in Chicago were examined using data from the Illinois State Cancer Registry, Illinois Department of Public Health Vital Records, and the Illinois Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.


The breast cancer mortality rate for black women in Chicago for 1999–2003 was 49% higher than that of white women, but the disparity is a recent phenomenon that is increasing rapidly. In 2003 the black rate was 68% higher than the white rate. Mortality rates were similar in the 1980’s and only started to diverge in the 1990’s as a result of a sharp improvement in mortality among white women contrasted with no improvement for black women. This lack of progress for black women is perplexing given that self-reported mammography screening rates have been the same for blacks and whites in Chicago since at least 1996 and that the early detection of breast cancer for black women has been increasing.


There has been no improvement in mortality from breast cancer for black women in Chicago in 23 years. This study, along with a review of the literature, lends support to the hypothesis that the disparities in breast cancer mortality are due to differential access to mammography, differential quality in mammography, and differential access to treatment for breast cancer. Fortunately, all three are amenable to intervention, which would help ameliorate this unacceptable disparity.


Breast cancer Racial and ethnic disparities Mammography Stage 



Many thanks to our colleague Jade Dell for her assistance in preparing this manuscript. Work on this paper was supported by funding from Illinois Department of Public Health, Stand Against Cancer Initiative, Grant #60180053.


  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society (2004) Breast cancer facts and figures, 2004. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M (2002) Cancer statistics. 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 52:23–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991) Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bigby J, Holmes MD (2005) Disparities across the breast cancer continuum. Cancer Causes Control 16:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB (2005) Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care 43:141–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roetzheim RG, Gonzalez EC, Ferrante JM, Pal N, Van Durme DJ, Krischer JP (2000) Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes. Cancer 89:2202–2213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joslyn SA (2002) Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 95:1759–1766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoyert DL, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kung H (2006) Deaths: final data for 2003. National vital statistics reports: vol 54 no 13. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Margellos H, Silva A, Whitman S (2004) Comparison of health status indicators in Chicago: are black-white disparities worsening? Am J Public Health 94:116–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Office of Minority Health (Online) Eliminating racial & ethnic health disparities. Available from URL: [accessed 11 July 2006]
  12. 12.
    National Cancer Institute (Online) NCI challenge goal 2015: eliminating the suffering and death due to cancer. Available from URL: [accessed 11 July 2006]
  13. 13.
    Tyczynski JE, Hill TD, Berkel HJ (2006) Why do postmenopausal African-American women not benefit from overall breast cancer mortality decline? Ann Epidemiol 16:180–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    U.S. Census Bureau (Online) Census 2000, summary file 1. Generated by J Hirschman, using American FactFinder. Available from URL: [accessed 11 July 2006]
  15. 15.
    Illinois Department of Public Health, Illinois State Cancer Registry (2004) Cancer incidence data 1986–2002; data as of November 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C (1990) International classification of diseases for oncology, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A et al (2000) International classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young JL Jr, Roffers SD, Ries LAG, Fritz AG, Hurlbert A (eds) (2001) SEER summary staging manual – 2001: codes and coding instructions. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. NIH Pub. No. 01-4969Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ICD-9-CM Codebook 2001, 6th edn (2000) Vols 1, 2 & 3. St. Anthony’s Publishing, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organization (2006) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, Version for 2006. Available from URL: [accessed 11 July 2006]
  21. 21.
    Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Waller M, Leutzinger C, Condon K (1998) Objectives and design of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Paper presented at American Statistical Association National Meeting, Dallas TXGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al (eds) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2002. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Available from URL: Based on November 2004 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2005 [accessed 11 July 2006]
  23. 23.
    Illinois Department of Public Health (Online) Cancer in Illinois: statistics. Available from URL: [accessed 11 July 2006]
  24. 24.
    Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN (2000) Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 19:335–351 (correction: 2001; 20:655)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Richardson LC, Schulman J, Sever LE, Lee NC, Coate RJ (2001) Early-stage breast cancer treatment among medically underserved women diagnosed in a national screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nasseri K (2004) Secular trends in the incidence of female breast cancer in the United States, 1973–1998. Breast J 10(2):129–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harris DH, Bates JH, Cress R, Tabnak F, Wright WE (2004) Stage of breast cancer diagnosis among medically underserved women in California receiving mammography through a state screening program. Cancer Causes Control 15:721–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ernster VL, Barclay B, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson C (1996) Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA 275:913–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE et al (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1546–1554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McElroy JA, Remington PL, Gangnon RE, Hariharan L, Anderson LD (2006) Identifying geographic disparities in early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 3(1):1–8. Available from URL: [accessed 14 June 2006]
  31. 31.
    Chiang CL (1961) Standard error of the age-adjusted death rate. Vital Stat Selected Rep 47:275–285Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rothman KJ (1986) Modern epidemiology. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Keppel KG, Pearcy JN, Wagener DK (2002) Trends in racial and ethnic-specific rates for the Health Status Indicators: United States, 1990–98. In: Healthy people statistical notes. No. 23. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chu KC, Tarone RE, Brawley OW (1999) Breast cancer trends of black women compared with white women. Arch Fam Med 8:521–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R (2001) Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1704–1713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cooper R, Cutler J, Desvigne-Nickens P et al (2000) Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States: findings of the national conference on cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation 102:3137–3147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pearcy JN, Keppel KG (2002) A summary measure of health disparity. Public Health Rep 117:273–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L (2004) Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control 15:159–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status – 35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002. MMWR 54:981–985Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Norman SA, Localio AR, Zhou L et al (2003) Validation of self-reported screening mammography histories among women with and without breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 158(3):264–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carney PA, Goodrich ME, Mackenzie T et al (2005) Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire. Cancer 104(8):1726–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Armstrong K, Long JA, Shea JA (2004) Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women. Prev Med 38(6):754–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Caplan LS, Mandelson MT, Anderson LA (2003) Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol 157:267–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Caplan LS, McQueen DV, Qualters JR, Leff M, Garrett C, Calonge N (2003) Validity of women’s self-report of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population. Cancer Epi Bio Prev 12:1182–1187Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fiscella K, Franks P, Meldrum S (2004) Estimating racial/ethnic disparity in mammography rates: it all depends on how you ask the question. Prev Med 39:399–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kagay CR, Quale C, Smith-Bindman R (2006) Screening mammography in the American elderly. Am J Prev Med 31(2):142–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Peek ME, Han JH (2004) Disparities in screening mammography: current status, interventions, and implications. J Gen Intern Med 19:184–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi (2003) Mammogram screening in African American women: evaluating the research. Cancer 97(1 Suppl):258–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N et al (2006) Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med 144:541–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nass S, Ball J (eds) (2005) Improving breast imaging quality standards. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    May DS, Lee NC, Richardson LC, Giustozzi AG, Bobo JK (2000) Mammography and breast cancer detection by race and Hispanic ethnicity: results from a national program (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:697–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang H, Karesen R, Hervik A, Thoresen SO (2001) Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four countries and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening. Cancer Causes Control 12:39–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    NHS Breast Screening Programme (2003) Serving women for 15 years. Patnick J (ed). NHSBSP, Sheffield, England. Available from URL: [accessed 17 July 2006]Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Moss M, Steinhauer J (2002) “Mammogram clinic’s flaws highlight gaps in U.S. rules.” The New York Times 24:A1Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004) Breast cancer – screening data for assessing quality of services – New York, 2000–2003. MMWR 53(21):455–457Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jones BA, Culler CS, Kasi SV, Calvocoressi L (2001) Is variation in quality of mammographic services race linked? J Health Care Poor Underserved 12:113–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Smedley BA, Stith AY, Nelson AR (eds) (2003) Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Williams DR (1999) Race, socioeconomic status, and health: the added effects of racism and discrimination. Ann NY Acad Sci 896:173–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Satcher D (2006) Challenging the status quo. J Health Care Poor Underserved 17(1):xii–xivPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bloche MG (2004) Health care disparities: science, politics, and race. N Engl J Med 350:1574–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cunningham JE, Butler WM (2004) Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: clinical evidence for a biological basis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:161–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Vastag B (2003) Breast cancer racial gap examined. JAMA 290:1838–1839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brawley OW (2002) Disaggregating the effects of race and poverty on breast cancer outcomes. J Nat Cancer Inst 94:471–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Digman J, Redmont C, Fisher B, Constantino J, Edwards B (1997) Prognosis among African-American women and white women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma: findings from two randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel project (NSABP). Cancer 80:80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shavers VL, Brown ML (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:334–357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Griggs JJ, Sorbero ME, Stark AT, Heininger SE, Dick AW (2003) Racial disparity in the dose and dose intensity of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 81:21–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Jones BA, Dailey A, Calvocoressi L et al (2005) Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 16:809–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yankaskas BC, Klabunde CN, Ancelle-Par R et al (2004) International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done? J Med Screening 11:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE (2002) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specials and general radiologists. Radiology 224:861–869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sipkoff M (2004) Transparency called key to uniting cost control, quality improvement. Managed Care 13(1):38–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Li C, Daling J, Malone K (2003) Incidence of invasive breast cancer by hormone receptor status from 1992 to 1998. J Clin Oncol 22:47–53Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Allen TW (1994) The invention of the white race. Verso Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Cooper RS (2003) Race, genes, and health—new wine in old bottles? Int J Epidemiol 32:23–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Freeman HP (1998) The meaning of race in science – considerations for cancer research. Cancer 82:219–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Blackman DJ, Masi CM (2006) Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality: are we doing enough to address the root causes? J Clin Oncol 24:2170–2178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Brawley OW, Freeman HP (1999) Race and outcomes: is this the end of the beginning for minority health research? J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1433–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn Hirschman
    • 1
  • Steven Whitman
    • 1
  • David Ansell
    • 2
  1. 1.Sinai Urban Health InstituteSinai Health System, Mount Sinai HospitalChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Rush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations