Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 189–198 | Cite as

Risk of breast cancer associated with short-term use of oral contraceptives

  • Suzanne G. Folger
  • Polly A. Marchbanks
  • Jill A. McDonald
  • Leslie Bernstein
  • Giske Ursin
  • Jesse A. Berlin
  • Janet R. Daling
  • Sandra A. Norman
  • Brian L. Strom
  • Linda K. Weiss
  • Michael S. Simon
  • Ronald T. Burkman
  • Kathleen E. Malone
  • Robert Spirtas
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

To estimate breast cancer risk associated with short-term (<6 months) oral contraceptive use, and explore variation in estimates by use characteristics and medical, menstrual, and reproductive history.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study. Case subjects were white women and black women, 35–64 years old, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in July 1994–April 1998. Control subjects identified by random-digit dialing were matched to case subjects by age, race, and study site. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Overall, short-term oral contraceptive use was not associated with breast cancer risk (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.8–1.1). However, significant interaction between short-term use and menopausal status led to an observed increased breast cancer risk in pre-menopausal women (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.0–1.7) and a reduced risk in post-menopausal women (OR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.6–1.0) associated with short-term use. The association was more pronounced in women with non-contraceptive reasons for use and underlying risk factors for breast cancer.

Conclusions

These associations may result from underlying characteristics of users or unmeasured factors influencing duration of use and breast cancer risk.

Keywords

Oral contraceptives Breast cancer Epidemiology Case control studies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the women who participated in the Women’s CARE Study and to all scientists and staff at the research institutions who contributed to the study. This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with additional support from the National Cancer Institute, through contracts with Emory University (N01-HD-3-3168), the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (N01-HD-2-3166), the Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University (N01-HD-3-3174), the University of Pennsylvania (N01-HD-3-3176), and the University of Southern California (N01-HD-3-3175) and through an intraagency agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Y01-HD-7022). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contributed additional staff and computer support. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute provided assistance for study sites in Atlanta (N01-PC-67006), Detroit (N01-CN-65064), Los Angeles (N01-PC-67010), and Seattle (N01-CN-0532).

Brian Strom has been a consultant to and funded by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals on other related matters. Ronald T Burkman is a consultant to Pfizer, Inc and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and receives support from Berlex Laboratories, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Organon as a speaker. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

  1. 1.
    Wingo PA, Lee NC, Ory HW, Beral V, Peterson HB, Rhodes P (1991) Age-specific differences in the relationship between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol 78:161–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lipworth L, Katsouyanni K, Stuver S, Samoli E, Hankinson SE, Trichopoulos D (1995) Oral contraceptives, menopausal estrogens, and the risk of breast cancer: a case–control study in Greece. Int J Cancer 62:548–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chie W-C, Li C-Y, Huang C-S, Chang K-J, Yen M-L, Lin R-S (1998) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk in Taiwan, a country of low incidence of breast cancer and low use of oral contraceptives. Int J Cancer 77:219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    LaVecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S et al (1995) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: a cooperative Italian study. Int J Cancer 60:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumle M, Weiderpass E, Braaten T, Persson I, Adami H-O, Lund E (2002) Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: the Norwegian-Swedish women’s lifestyle and health cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1375–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gross TP, Schlesselman JJ, Stadel BV, Yu W, Lee NC (1992) The risk of ovarian cancer in short-term users of oral contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol 136:46–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greer JB, Modugno F, Allen GO, Ness RB (2005) Short-term oral contraceptive use and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 162:66–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hatcher RA, Guillebaud J (1998) The pill: combined oral contraceptives. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F (eds) Contraceptive Technology, 17th ed. Ardent Media, NewYork, pp 405–466Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenburg MJ, Waugh MA (1998) Oral contraceptive discontinuation: a prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG et al (2002) The NICHD women’s contraceptive and reproductive experiences study: methods and operational results. Ann Epidemiol 12:213–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marchbanks PA, McDonald JA, Wilson HG et al (2002) Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 346:2025–2032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hatcher RA, Guest F, Stewart F et al. (1989) Combined oral contraceptives. In: Breedlove RA, Judy B, Martin N (eds) Contraceptive Technology 1988–1989, 14 ed. Irvington Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 202–203Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olsson H, Moller TR, Ranstam J (1989) Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer among premenopausal women: final report from a study in southern Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1000–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Romieu I, Berlin JA, Colditz G (1990) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Review and meta-analysis. Cancer 66:2253–2263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McPherson K, Neil A, Vessey MP, Doll R (1983) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Lancet 2:1414–1415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brinton LA, Daling JR, Liff JM et al (1995) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among younger women. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:827–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996) Breast cancer and hormonal contraception: further results. Contraception 54(Suppl):1S–106SGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jernstrom H, Loman N, Johannsson OT, Borg A, Olsson H (2005) Impact of teenage oral contraceptive use in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer cases who have undergone BRCA mutation testing. Eur J Cancer 41:2312–2320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2005) Noncontraceptive health benefits of combined oral contraception. Hum Reprod Update 11:513–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Junod SW, Marks L (2002) Women’s trials: the approval of the first oral contraceptive pill in the United States and Great Britain. J Hist Med Allied Sci 57:117–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jensen JT, Speroff L (2000) Health benefits of oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 27:705–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Ricci E, Crosignani PG (1998) Oral contraceptive use and benign gynecologic conditions. Contraception 57:11–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Talamini R, Franceschi S, Favero A, Negri E, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C (1997) Selected medical conditions and risk of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 75:1699–1703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brinton LA, Gridley G, Persson I, Baron J, Bergqvist A (1997) Cancer risk after a hospital discharge diagnosis of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:572–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ness RB, Modugno F (2006) Endometriosis as a model for inflammation-hormone interactions in ovarian and breast cancers. Eur J Cancer 42:691–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996) Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Lancet 347:1713–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanne G. Folger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Polly A. Marchbanks
    • 1
  • Jill A. McDonald
    • 1
  • Leslie Bernstein
    • 3
  • Giske Ursin
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jesse A. Berlin
    • 5
  • Janet R. Daling
    • 6
  • Sandra A. Norman
    • 7
  • Brian L. Strom
    • 7
  • Linda K. Weiss
    • 8
  • Michael S. Simon
    • 9
  • Ronald T. Burkman
    • 10
  • Kathleen E. Malone
    • 6
  • Robert Spirtas
    • 11
  1. 1.Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.AtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of NutritionUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and DevelopmentTitusvilleUSA
  6. 6.Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUSA
  7. 7.Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Biostatistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  8. 8.Cancer Centers BranchNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  9. 9.Division of Hematology and OncologyKarmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State UniversityDetroitUSA
  10. 10.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBaystate Medical CenterSpringfieldUSA
  11. 11.Contraception and Reproductive Health Branch, Center for Population ResearchNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations