Meta-analysis of Studies of Alcohol and Breast Cancer with Consideration of the Methodological Issues
- 736 Downloads
To give an up-to-date assessment of the association of alcohol with female breast cancer, addressing methodological issues and shortfalls in previous overviews.
Meta-analysis of studies (any language) providing original data on incidence of first primary breast cancer and alcohol. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Study quality assessed by objective criteria including degree of control for confounding; funnel plots examined for publication bias; meta-regression techniques to explore heterogeneity. Risks associated with drinking versus not drinking and dose–response not constrained through the origin estimated using random effects methods.
Ninety-eight unique studies were included, involving 75,728 and 60,653 cases in drinker versus non-drinker and dose–response analyses, respectively. Findings were robust to study design and analytic approaches in the meta-analyses. For studies judged high quality, controlled for appropriate confounders, excess risk associated with alcohol drinking was 22% (95% CI: 9–37%); each additional 10 g ethanol/day was associated with risk higher by 10% (95% CI: 5–15%). There was no evidence of publication bias. Risk did not differ significantly by beverage type or menopausal status. Estimated population attributable risks were 1.6 and 6.0% in USA and UK, respectively.
Taking account of shortcomings in the study base and methodological concerns, we confirm the alcohol–breast cancer association. We compared our results to those of an individual patient data analysis, with similar findings. We conclude that the association between alcohol and breast cancer may be causal.
KeywordsAlcohol Breast cancer Epidemiology Meta-analysis
- 1.Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F (2000) Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. WileyGoogle Scholar
- 8.Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer – collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 87:1234–1245Google Scholar
- 11.Hedges, LV, Olkin, I 1985Statistical methods for meta-analysisAcademic PressOrlando, FLGoogle Scholar
- 15.http://www.doh.gov.uk/stats/tables/atrend9811.xls, accessed Jan 2003 http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/scottishhealthsurvey/sh809–04.html, accessed Jan 2003Google Scholar
- 16.Schoenborn CA, Dams PF (2001) Alcohol use among adults: United States, 1997–98. Advance data from vital and health statistics; No. 324. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- 17.SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1973–1994. National Cancer InstituteGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cancer statistic registrations for England, 1998, http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites/documents/242/CancerIncidence1992–2001.pdf, accessed Jan 2003 http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/isd/cancer/excel/female_breast_1b.xls, accessed Jan 2003 http://researchservices1.qub.ac.uk/nicr/incidence_search.htm, accessed Jan 2003Google Scholar
- 19.Hedges, B, di Salvo, P 1998
Alcohol consumption and smokingPrescott-Clarke, PPrimatesta, P eds. The health survey for England 1996The Stationery OfficeLondonGoogle Scholar
- 20.Light, RJ, Pillemar, DB 1984Summing up: the science of reviewing researchHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- 37.Gill, J 2000The effects of moderate alcohol consumption on female hormone levels and reproductive functionAlcohol35417423Google Scholar
- 39.Henderson BE, Pike MC, Bernstein L, Ross RK (1996) Breast Cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, pp 1022–1039Google Scholar