Inadequate Follow-up of Abnormal Screening Mammograms: Findings From the Race Differences in Screening Mammography Process Study (United States)
Despite relatively high mammography screening rates, there are reports of inadequate follow-up of abnormal results. Our objective was to identify factors associated with inadequate follow-up, and specifically, to determine if this outcome differed by race/ethnicity.
We studied 176 subjects with abnormal or inconclusive mammograms identified from a prospective cohort study of African-American (n = 635) and White (n = 816) women who underwent screening in five hospital-based facilities in Connecticut, October 1996 through January 1998. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of inadequate follow-up of an abnormal mammogram.
Over 28% of women requiring immediate or short-term follow-up did not receive this care within three months of the recommended return date. African-American race/ethnicity, pain during the mammogram, and lack of a usual provider were significant independent predictors of inadequate follow-up. Although many factors were examined, the observed race difference was unexplained.
While inadequate follow-up of abnormal exams undermines the potential benefits of mammography screening for all women, the observed race difference in this study may have implications for the persistent race difference in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival. More research is needed to identify factors that contribute to poor follow-up among African-American women.
Keywordsabnormal results African-Americans follow-up health care delivery mammography screening
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/breastcancer/brcanrr.htm Accessed March 8, 2004
- 7.National Cancer Institute (2002) NCI Statement on Mammography Screening. Available at: http://www.nci.nih.gov/newscenter/mammstatement31jan02, Accessed March 8, 2004
- 14.McCarthy, EP, Burns, RB, Coughlin, SS, et al. 1998Mammography use helps to explain differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis between older black and white women (see comments)Ann 0Intern Med128729736Google Scholar
- 16.Schootman, M, Myers-Geadelmann, J, Fuortes, L 2000Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abormal breast cancer screening resultsJ Am Board Fam Practice1394100Google Scholar
- 20.Chang, S, Kerlikowske, K, Napoles-Springer, A 1996Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammographyCancer Practice7813951402Google Scholar
- 23.U.S. Census Bureau Fact Finder. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsTable?_lang=en&_vt_name=DEC_2000_ PL_U_GCTPL_ST7&_geo_id=04000US09. Accessed February 18, 2005
- 24.State of Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development (1990) Connecticut Population Information. Available at: http://www.ct.gov/ecd/cwp/view.asp?a=1106&q= 250666. Accessed February 18, 2005
- 26.American College of Radiology1998Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS®)3American College of RadiologyReston, VAGoogle Scholar
- 27.Duncan, OD 1961
A socioeconomic index for all occupations.AJ, R eds. Occupations and Social StatusFree Press of GlencoeNew York109138Google Scholar
- 29.National Institutes of Health1998Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults – The evidence reportObes Res651S209SGoogle Scholar
- 30.Holford, T. 2002Multivariate Methods in EpidemiologyOxford University PressNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
- 31.Greenland, S 1989Modeling and variable selection in epidemiological analysisAm J Epidemiol793409Google Scholar
- 32.Blackman, DK, Bennett, EM, Miller, DS 1999Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997)–Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemMMWR CDC Surveill Summ48122Google Scholar