Lymphohematopoietic Cancers in the United Farm Workers of America (UFW), 1988–2001
- 270 Downloads
Agricultural risk factors for lymphohematopoeitic cancers (LHC) in Hispanic farm workers in California were examined in a nested case–control study embedded in a cohort of 139,000 ever members of a farm worker labor union in California.
Crop and pesticide exposures were estimated by linking county/month and crop specific job history information from union records with California Department of Pesticide Regulation pesticide use reports during the 20-year period prior to cancer diagnosis.
A total of 131 LHC diagnosed in California between 1988 and 2001 were included in the analysis. Analyses were conducted by gender and subtype of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (nodal, extra nodal) and by leukemia histology (lymphocytic, granulocytic). Odds ratios were calculated by stratification and by unconditional logistic regression. Risk for all LHC was elevated in workers cultivating vegetables (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.12–2.48). Risk of leukemia was associated with exposure to the pesticides mancozeb (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.12–4.95) and toxaphene (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.04–4.65) while NHL risk was increased in association with 2,4-D (OR = 3.80, 95% CI=1.85–7.81). Risk of leukemia was particularly elevated among female workers and for granulocytic versus lymphocytic leukemia for several chemicals. No associations were noted for multiple myeloma.
California farm workers employed where mancozeb and toxaphene were used had an increased risk of leukemia compared to farm workers employed elsewhere. Employment in farms using 2,4-D was associated with an increased risk of NHL.
Keywordsepidemiology farm workers leukemia lymphoma pesticides
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Stubbs, A, Harris, J, Spear, R 1984A proportionate mortality analysis of California agricultural workers, 1978–1979Am J IndustMed6305320Google Scholar
- 4.Mason TJ, McKay FW, Hoover R, et al. (1975) Atlas of Cancer Mortality in U.S. Counties, 1950–1969. DHEW (NIH) Pub. No. 76–1204. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
- 5.Zahm, SK, Ward, MH, Blair, A 1997Pesticides and CancerOccup Med: Sta Art Rev12269289Google Scholar
- 12.Morris C, Cohen R, Perkins C, et al. (1999) Cancer in California, 1988–1996. Sacramento, CA: California Health Department Of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance SectionGoogle Scholar
- 13.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (1986) Summary Staging Guide for the Cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Reporting (SEER) Program. Bethesda, MD; U.S. Public Health Services, National Institute of HealthGoogle Scholar
- 14.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (1992) SEER Extent of Disease - 1988 Coding Instructions, Second Edition. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 92–2313Google Scholar
- 16.California Department of Pesticide Regulation (2000) Pesticide use reporting: an overview of California’s unique full reporting system. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Pesticide RegulationGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mantel, N 1963Chi square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedureJ Am Stat Assoc58690700Google Scholar
- 19.Breslow, NE, Day, NE 1980Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. 1. The analysis of case control studiesInternational Agency for ResearchLyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 20.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 11.2001. Chicago, IL. 20. SPSS.Google Scholar
- 20.USDA (1997) Census of Agriculture, 1997, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
- 22.California Department of Pesticide Regulation (2001) Website available at :http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur98rep/ tables04.htm
- 31.Blair, A, Zahm, SH 1991Cancer among farmersOccup Med3335354Google Scholar
- 33.United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division, Science Information Management Branch (2004) Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential. July 2004Google Scholar
- 34.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2002) Agricultural Bulletin Board on Data Collection, Dissemination, and Quality of Statistics. URL available at:http://apps. fao.org/page/collection?subset=agriculture
- 38.Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Ecologic Studies. In: Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven PublishersGoogle Scholar