Colorectal Screening is Associated with Reduced Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Case–Control Study within the Population-Based Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry
This is the first study to evaluate the association between colonic screening and colorectal cancer risk among Canadians.
A case–control study was conducted. Cases were diagnosed with cancer of the colorectum, between 1997 and 2000, aged 20 to 74 years, identified through the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry and recruited by the Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry. Controls were a sex- and age-matched random sample of the population of Ontario. 971 cases and 1944 controls completed questionnaires (including colorectal screening history and many risk factors). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (OR) estimates.
Having had a fecal occult blood screen was associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk (OR=0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59, 0.97). Having had a screening sigmoidoscopy was associated with a halving of colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.80). Having had a screening colonoscopy did not significantly reduce colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.07); however, having had either screening endoscopy was associated with a significant reduction in colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.87). Findings differed slightly by anatomic sub-site (proximal and distal colorectum).
We report a reduction in colorectal cancer risk among persons who underwent colorectal cancer screening; in particular, sigmoidoscopy. Findings are of great importance for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
Key wordscase–control study colorectal cancer incidence prevention screening.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) (2003) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2003, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- McLaughlin JR, Sloan M, Janovjak D (1995) Cancer Survival in Ontario. The Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
- Thiis-Evensen, E, Hoff, G, Sauar, J, et al. 1999Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancerTelemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol34414420Google Scholar
- Cotterchio, M, McKeown-Eyssen, G, Sutherland, H, et al. 2000Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry: Methods and First Year Response RatesChron Dis Canada218186Google Scholar
- International Classification of Diseases.1977Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Disease, Injuries, and Causes of Death, 9th Revision ConferenceWorld Health OrganizationGeneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Holowaty, EJ, Lee, G, Dale, D, Chong, N 1994A reabstraction study to estimate the accuracy and completeness of data elements in the Ontario Cancer RegistryAmerican Association of Central Cancer RegistriesNiagara-on-the-Lake, OntarioGoogle Scholar
- Easson, A, Cotterchio, M, Dale, D, Holowaty, E, Gallinger, S 2002The accuracy of site specific coding for colorectal cancer in a provincial cancer registryNorth American Association of Cancer Registries MeetingTorontoGoogle Scholar
- Schlesselman, JJ 1982Case–control studies. Design, conduct, analysisOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
- Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care. (2001) Can Med Assoc J 165: 206–208Google Scholar
- Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). (2004) Vinden C, Schultz S, Rabeneck L. Use of Large Bowel Procedures in OntarioGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2001) Trends in Screening for colorectal cancer-United States, 1997 and 1999. JAMA 285: 1570–1571Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2003) Colorectal cancer test use among persons aged >50 years-United States, 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. March 14, 52(1): 193–196Google Scholar