Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 655–662 | Cite as

Cancer and Laterality: A Study of The Five Major Paired Organs (UK)

  • Rahul Roychoudhuri
  • Venkata Putcha
  • Henrik Møller
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

The human body displays marked asymmetry: paired organs differ bilaterally exerting effects upon cancer incidence and progression. However the factors involved remain contentious. In this large study involving over a quarter of a million cancer patients, we examine the epidemiological correlates of cancer laterality including incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival in the five major paired organs: the breasts, lungs, kidneys, testes and ovaries.

Methods

Cancer patients were selected from the Thames Cancer Registry database and age-standardised incidence rates (ASRs), stage distribution at diagnosis and survival rates computed, stratifying appropriately.

Results

Cancer incidence differed significantly by laterality at all sites studied (p<0.01) but substantially in the lung (left–right incidence-rate ratio [IRR] 0.87), breast (IRR 1.07), testis (IRR 0.87) and in ovarian cancer (IRR 0.86). Autopsy data showed strongly coincident left–right organ size ratios (0.87 in the lungs and 0.87 in the testes). Patients with left testicular cancer, right lung cancer and left ovarian cancer showed significantly better survival than those with contralateral disease (p<0.05).

Conclusions

In the lungs and testes, asymmetries in cancer incidence closely coincided with asymmetries in organ size. Our results suggest that tissue mass in these organs is an important contributor to asymmetry in cancer incidence.

Keywords

Laterality Cancer Incidence Stage Survival Asymmetry 

References

  1. 1.
    Weiss HA, Devesa SS, Brinton LA (1996) Laterality of breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 7:539–543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perkins CI, Hotes J, Kohler BA, Howe HL (2004) Association between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994–1998. Cancer Causes Control 15:637–645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfinkel L, Craig L, Seidman H (1959) An appraisal of left and right breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 23:617–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saxen E, Teppo L, Hakulinen T (1977) Epidemiology of lung cancer in Scandinavia. IARC Sci Publ 217–228Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parkash O (1977) Lung cancer A statistical study based on autopsy data from 1928 to 1972. Respiration 34:295–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delahunt B, Bethwaite P, Nacey JN (1994) Renal cell carcinoma in New Zealand: a national survival study. Urology 43:300–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stone JM, Cruickshank DG, Sandeman TF, Matthews JP (1991) Laterality, maldescent, trauma and other clinical factors in the epidemiology of testis cancer in Victoria, Australia. Br J Cancer 64:132–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brenner H, Gefeller O (1996) An alternative approach to monitoring cancer patient survival. Cancer 78:2004–2010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esteve J, Benhamou E, Raymond L (1994) Statistical methods in cancer research. In: Esteve J, Benhamou E, Raymond L (eds) Descriptive epidemiology. IARC Sci Publ, Lyon pp 1–302Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grandmaison GL, Clairand I, Durigon M (2001) Organ weight in 684 adult autopsies: new tables for a Caucasoid population. Forensic Sci Int 15(119):149–154Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spyropoulos E, Borousas D, Mavrikos S, Dellis A, Bourounis M, Athanasiadis S (2002) Size of external genital organs and somatometric parameters among physically normal men younger than 40 years old. Urology 60:485–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D (1991) Breast size, handedness and breast cancer risk Eur J Cancer 27:131–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egan KM, Newcomb PA, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al. (1999) The relation of breast size to breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 10:115–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet 360:187–195Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramadhani MK, Elias SG, van Noord PA, Grobbee DE, Peeters PH, Uiterwaal CS (2005) Innate left handedness and risk of breast cancer: case-cohort study. BMJ 15:882–883Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bogaert AF (1997) Genital asymmetry in men. Hum Reprod. 12:68–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ansell PE, Bennett V, Bull D, Jackson MB, Pike LA, Pike MC (1992) Cryptorchidism: a prospective study of 7500 consecutive male births, 1984–1988. John Radcliffe Hospital Cryptorchidism Study Group. Arch Dis Child 67:892–899Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Møller H, Evans H (2003) Epidemiology of gonadal germ cell cancer in males and females. APMIS 111:43–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saito S (2003) Evaluation of cases where the right kidney is higher than the left kidney. Int J Urol 10:359–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Longnecker MP, et al. (1994) Lactation and a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 13:81–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul Roychoudhuri
    • 1
  • Venkata Putcha
    • 1
  • Henrik Møller
    • 1
  1. 1.Thames Cancer Registry, Division of Cancer StudiesGuy’s, King’s and St. Thomas’ School of MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations