Of Mice and Women: Light as a Circadian Stimulus in Breast Cancer Research
- 278 Downloads
Nocturnal rodents are frequently used as models in human breast cancer research, but these species have very different visual and circadian systems and, therefore, very different responses to optical radiation or, informally, light. Because of the impact of light on the circadian system and because recent evidence suggests that cancer risk might be related to circadian disruption, it is becoming increasingly clear that optical radiation must be properly characterized for both nocturnal rodents and diurnal humans to make significant progress in unraveling links between circadian disruption and breast cancer. In this paper, we propose a quantitative framework for comparing radiometric and photometric quantities in human and rodent studies.
We reviewed published research on light as a circadian stimulus for humans and rodents. Both suppression of nocturnal melatonin and phase shifting were examined as outcome measures for the circadian system.
The data were used to develop quantitative comparisons regarding the absolute and spectral sensitivity for the circadian systems of humans and nocturnal rodents.
Two models of circadian phototransduction, for mouse and humans, have been published providing spectral sensitivities for these two species. Despite some methodological variations among the studies reviewed, the circadian systems of nocturnal rodents are approximately 10,000 times more sensitive to optical radiation than that of humans. Circadian effectiveness of different sources for both humans and nocturnal rodents are offered together with a scale relating their absolute sensitivities. Instruments calibrated in terms of conventional photometric units (e.g., lux) will not accurately characterize the circadian stimulus for either humans or rodents.
KeywordsMelatonin suppression Phase shifting Breast cancer Animal studies Lighting
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Lighting Research Center and by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant ES11659.
- 12.Stevens RG, Wilson BW, Anderson LE (eds) (1997) The Melatonin Hypothesis: Breast Cancer and Use of Electric Power. Columbus, OH, Battelle PressGoogle Scholar
- 18.Swerdlow A (2003) Shift Work and Breast Cancer Risk: A Critical Review of the Epidemiological Evidence, Research Report 132 Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UKGoogle Scholar
- 24.Stevens RG (2005) Circadian disruption and breast cancer: from melatonin to clock genes. Epidemiol 16:254–258Google Scholar
- 26.Reiter RJ (1985) Action spectra, dose-response relationships, and temporal aspects of light’s effects on the pineal gland. Anal NY Acad Sci 453:215–230Google Scholar
- 35.Webb SM, Champney TH, Lewinski AK, Reiter RJ (1985) Photoreceptor damage and eye pigmentation: influence on the sensitivity of rat pineal N-acetyltransferase activity and melatonin levels to light at night. Neuroendocrinol 40:205–209Google Scholar
- 37.Reiter RJ, Hurlbut EC, Brainard GC, Steinlechner S, Richardson BA (1983) Influence of light irradiance on hydroxyindole-O-methyltransferase activity, serotonin-N-acetyltransferase activity, and radioimmunoassayable melatonin levels in the pineal gland of the diurnally active Richardson’s ground squirrel. Brain Res 288:151–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 69.Rea MS (ed.) (2000) IESNA Lighting Handbook: Reference and Application, 9th edn, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 70.Sekuler R, Blake R (1994) Perception, 3rd edn, New York, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
- 72.He Y, Rea MS, Bierman A, Bullough J (1997) Evaluating light source efficacy under mesopic conditions using reaction times. J Illum Eng Soc 26, 125–138Google Scholar
- 75.Rea MS, Figueiro MG, Bullough JD (2002) Circadian photobiology: An emerging framework for lighting practice and research. Lighting Res Technol 34:177–190Google Scholar