Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 16, Supplement 1, pp 3–14

Collaborating to Conquer Cancer: A Comprehensive Approach to Cancer Control

  • Leslie S. Given
  • Bruce Black
  • Garry Lowry
  • Philip Huang
  • Jon F. Kerner
Article

Abstract

Despite substantial contributions on the part of public, non-profit, and private sector organizations, the burden of cancer in the United States remains high. As public health organizations, particularly county, state, tribal, and territorial health departments, try to reduce the significant burden of cancer, they face additional issues that make it difficult to address cancer in a comprehensive way. These challenges along with the need to accelerate progress in reducing the U.S. cancer burden, prompted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its national partners to begin to work together to further define and describe comprehensive cancer control (CCC) as an approach to reducing the burden of cancer. CCC is defined as “an integrated and coordinated approach to reducing cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality through prevention, early detection, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation.” This article describes the national effort to support comprehensive cancer control, outlines national and state level success in comprehensive cancer control, and provides a call to action to public, private, and non-profit organizations, governments of all levels, and individuals to renew their commitments to reducing the burden of cancer.

Keywords

comprehensive cancer control cancer burden national cancer partners 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Public Law 92–218, 92nd Congress, S-1828, December 23.1971 (http://www3.cancer.gov/legis/1971canc.html; http://rex.nci.nih.gov/massmedia/CANCER_RES RCH_WEBSITE/1971.html).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doll, R, Peto, R 1981The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States todayJNCI6611911308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_1964/1964%20SGR%20 Intro.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Cancer Society2005Cancer Facts and Figures 2005American Cancer SocietyAtlantaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curry, SJByers, THewitt, M eds. 2003Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early DetectionNational Cancer Policy BoardWashington D.C.1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abed, J, Reilley, B, Butler, MO, Kean, T, Wong, F, Hohman, K 2000Comprehensive cancer control initiative of the centers for disease control and prevention: an example of participatory innovation diffusionJ Publ Health Manag Pract679Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Public Health Service1983Public Health Service implementation plans for attaining the objectives for the NationPubl Health Rep981178Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985–2000 In: Greenwald P, Sondik EJ, (eds). NCI Monographs, Number 2, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodman, RM, Steckler, A, Alciati, MH 1997The impact of the National Cancer Institute’s data-based intervention research program on state health agenciesHealth Educ Res12199211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Cancer Institute. Community-based Interventions for Smokers: The COMMIT Field Experience. Smoking, Tobacco Control Monograph No.6. Bethesda MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, NCI. NIH Pub. No. 95–4028. August 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Cancer Institute. ASSIST: Shaping the Future of Tobacco Prevention and Control. Tobacco Control Mongraph No. 16 Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, NCI. NIH Pub. No. 05–5645, May 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Potter JD, Finnegan JR, Guinard JX, et al. 5 A Day for Better Health Program Evaluation Report. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, NCI. NIH Pub. No.01–4904. November 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaluzny, AD, Lacey, LM, Warnecke, R, Morrissey, JP, Sondik, E, Ford, L. 1994Using a community cancer treatment trials network for cancer prevention and control research: challenges and opportunitiesCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev3261269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abed, J, Reilley, B, Butler, MO, Kean, T, Wong, F, Hohman, K 2000Developing a framework for comprehensive cancer prevention and control in the United States: an initiative of the Centers for Disease Control and PreventionJ Public Health Manag Pract66778Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Butler MO, Abed J, Hare ML, Orians C, Rose, JM. Essential Elements for Developing/Expanding Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs: Design Options for State Health Agncies. Prepared for CDC, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control by Battelle CPHRE. May 1999. (http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp/elements/index.htm).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CDC2002Guidance for Comprehensive Cancer Control PlanningDepartment of Health and Human ServicesAtlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lasker, R, Weiss, E, Miller, R (2001) Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarter, 79 (2).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    DiMaggio, P, Powell, W 1983The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fieldsAm Sociol Rev48147160Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention1997SummaryCancer Causes Control8S50Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lance Armstrong Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004) A National Action Plan for Cancer Survivorship: Advancing Public Health Strategies. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivorship/overview.htm.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Washington State Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan, 2004–2008. Olympia, WA: Washington Comprehensive Cancer Control Partnership, January 2004. Available from: URL: http://www.doh.wa.gov/ccc.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harris JR, Brown PK, Coughlin S, et al. The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jan [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/jan/04_0059.htm.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klabunde, CN, Frame, PS, Meadow, A, Jones, E, Nadel, M, Vernon, SW 2003A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practicesPrev Med36352362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie S. Given
    • 1
  • Bruce Black
    • 2
  • Garry Lowry
    • 3
  • Philip Huang
    • 4
  • Jon F. Kerner
    • 5
  1. 1.Program Services Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and ControlCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Health Promotion Planning and EvaluationAmerican Cancer SocietyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Program Services Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and ControlCenters for Disease Control and PreventionOlympiaUSA
  4. 4.Chronic Disease Prevention, Health Promotion UnitTexas Department of State Health ServicesAustinUSA
  5. 5.Research Dissemination and Diffusion, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations