The Healthy People 2010 smoking prevalence and tobacco control objectives: results from the SimSmoke tobacco control policy simulation model (United States)
- 223 Downloads
Objectives: Healthy People 2010 (HP2010) set a goal of reducing the adult smoking prevalence to 12% by 2010. Smoking prevalence rates do not appear to be declining at or near the rate targeted in the HP2010 goals. The purpose of this paper is to examine the attainability of HP2010 smoking prevalence objectives through the stricter tobacco control policies suggested in HP2010.
Methods: A tested dynamic simulation model of smoking trends, known as SimSmoke, is applied. Smoking prevalence evolves over time through initiation and cessation, behaviors which are in turned influenced by tobacco control policies. We consider the effect of changes in taxes/prices, clean air laws, media campaigns, cessation programs and youth access policies on projected smoking prevalence over the period 2003–2020, focusing on the levels in 2010.
Results: The SimSmoke model projects that the aging of older cohorts and the impact of policies in years prior to 2004 will yield a reduction in smoking rates to 18.4% by 2010, which is substantially above the 2010 target of 12%. When policies similar to the HP2010 tobacco control policy objectives are implemented, SimSmoke projects that smoking rates could be reduced to 16.1%. Further reductions might be realized by increasing the tax rate by $1.00.
Conclusions: The SimSmoke model suggests that the HP2010 smoking prevalence objective is unlikely to be attained. Although we are unlikely to reach the goals by meeting the HP2010 policy objectives, they could get us much closer to the goal. Emphasis should be placed on meeting the tax, clean air, media/comprehensive campaigns, and cessation treatment objectives.
KeywordsHealthy People 2010 simulation model smoking tobacco control policies.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.National Center for Health Statistics2001Healthy People 2000: A final reviewPublic Health ServiceHyattsville MDGoogle Scholar
- 2.U.S. DHHS2000Healthy People 2010Centers for Disease Control, Office of Disease Prevention and Health PromotionAtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 3.U.S. DHHS (1989) Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 4.CDC2002Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs–United States, 1995–1999MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep51300303Google Scholar
- 5.CDC (2002) www.cdc.gov/tobacco/research_data/adults_prev/adstat3.htm and www.cdc.gov/tobacco/research_data/adults_ prev/tab_3.htm, CDC website.Google Scholar
- 6.CDC2004Cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 2002MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep53427431Google Scholar
- 9.Levy, DT, Nikolayev, N, Mumford, EA 2004A validation of the SimSmoke Simulation Model: The Role of Tobacco Control Policies in Recent YearsPIRE Working PaperCalverton, MDGoogle Scholar
- 12.U.S. DHHS (1992) Smoking and Health in the Americas: a Report of the Surgeon General, in Collaboration with the Pan American Health Organization. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 13.U.S. DHHS (1990) The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 18.National Cancer Institute2000State and Local Legislative Action to Reduce Tobacco UseU.S. DHHS, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer InstituteBethesda MDGoogle Scholar
- 21.Levy, DT, Mumford, EA 2004The Healthy People 2000 and 2010 Tobacco Control Policies Objectives: A Review of the Policies Implemented in 1990–2004Pacific InsitituteCalverton MDGoogle Scholar
- 27.CDC2004State medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments – United States, 1994–2002MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep535457Google Scholar
- 28.McPhillips-Tangum, C, Cahill, A, Bocchino, C, Cutler, CM 2002Addressing tobacco in managed care: results from the 2000 surveyPrevent Med Managed Care38595Google Scholar
- 30.Levy, DT, Mumford, E, Pesin, B 2003Tobacco control policies, and reductions in smoking rates and smoking-related deaths: results from the SimSmoke modelExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research3457468Google Scholar
- 31.U.S. DHHS (2000) Reducing Tobacco Use: a Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 34.Friend K, Levy D (2002) Reductions in smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption associated with mass-media campaigns. Health Educ Res 17: 1, 85–98Google Scholar
- 37.Jha, P, Chaloupka, F 2000Tobacco Control in Developing CountriesOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 40.Gilpin EA, Emery SL, Farkas AJ, et al. (2003) Tobacco Control Successes in California: A focus on the Young People, Results from the California Tobacco Control Surveys, 1990–2002. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
- 41.CDC2003Cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 2001MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep52953956Google Scholar