A case for informed consent? Indoor UV tanning facility operator’s provision of health risks information (United States)
- 65 Downloads
Indoor UV tanning is associated with skin cancer. This study describes consumer health risks information provided by indoor UV tanning facility operators in four states (Colorado, Illinois, Texas, and Wisconsin) with varying operator training, regulations, enforcement and penalties.
Using a cross-sectional survey study design, 100 randomly selected licensed indoor UV tanning facilities from each state were surveyed anonymously by telephone. Facility operators were questioned regarding the provision of information on potential adverse effects of indoor UV exposure.
Of 628 licensed indoor UV tanning facilities contacted, 400 facilities were surveyed. Most (87%) advised patrons of the potential risk of sunburn from indoor tanning. Less than half of facility operators in Colorado, Texas and Wisconsin informed patrons about the risk of skin cancer (42, 43 and 48%, respectively) compared with 81% of Illinois operators. Likewise, more operators in Illinois reported the risk of premature aging (79%) compared with other states (41% Colorado, 43% Texas and 51% Wisconsin).
Tanning facility operators frequently misinformed patrons of indoor UV exposure risks. The provision of informed consent by indoor tanning facility operators needs improved adaptation by the tanning industry as a standard for customer service.
Keywordsinformed consent risk tanning ultraviolet rays.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 11.Department of Health and Human Services (US), Food and Drug Administration (2003) Performance standards for light-emitting products (21 CFR 1040). Fed Reg: Title 21, Volume 8.Google Scholar
- 12.Illinois Department of Public Health (1992) Tanning facilities code (77 Ill. Adm. Code 795). Rules of the Illinois Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
- 13.2001–2002 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations (2001) Chapter 255: Chronic disease and injuries (s. 255.08).Google Scholar
- 14.Texas Department of Health (2002) Rules for licensure of tanning facilities (25 Texas Administrative Code, §§ 229.341–229.357).Google Scholar
- 15.Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment (1989) Artificial tanning device regulations (Section 25-5-106(1), (2)(a),(2)(b)).Google Scholar
- 18.Centers for Disease Control1989Injuries associated with ultraviolet tanning devices – WisconsinJAMA26135193520Google Scholar
- 19.Food and Drug Administration (1998) The consent process. In: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators. http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/informedconsent.html#process, accessed on June 4, 2004.Google Scholar