Advertisement

The Consumers’ Emotional Dog Learns to Persuade Its Rational Tail: Toward a Social Intuitionist Framework of Ethical Consumption

  • Lamberto ZolloEmail author
Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

Literature on consumers’ ethical decision making is rooted in a rationalist perspective that emphasizes the role of moral reasoning. However, the view of ethical consumption as a thorough rational and conscious process fails to capture important elements of human cognition, such as emotions and intuitions. Based on moral psychology and microsociology, this paper proposes a holistic and integrated framework showing how emotive and intuitive information processing may foster ethical consumption at individual and social levels. The model builds on social intuitionism to show how consumers’ a priori affect-laden intuitive moral judgments impact their post hoc reflective moral reasoning. Symbolic interactionism is used to interpret consumers as interdependent and socially embedded agents that self-construct their social identity through interactions with other consumers. The proposed social intuitionist framework of consumers’ ethical decision making shows that other-oriented moral emotions—such as elevation, gratitude, and empathy—interact with persuasion and social influence in ethical consumption. Consequently, moral emotions and intuition drive interpersonal persuasion among ethical consumers. Theoretical propositions and implications for consumer ethics theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Consumer ethical decision making Emotion Ethical consumption Intuition Persuasion Social influence 

Notes

Funding

This study has not received any funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, L. S., Reynolds, S. J., & Turan, B. (2015). Turning inward or focusing out? Navigating theories of interpersonal and ethical cognitions to understand ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics,130(2), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research,32(2), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research,15(2), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (1999). Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Academy of Management Executive,13(4), 91–99.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2009). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision-making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues,21(4), 534–551.Google Scholar
  8. Carrington, M. J., Zwick, D., & Neville, B. (2016). The ideology of the ethical consumption gap. Marketing Theory,16(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caruana, R., Carrington, M. J., & Chatzidakis, A. (2016). “Beyond the attitude-behaviour gap: Novel perspectives in consumer ethics”: Introduction to the thematic symposium. Journal of Business Ethics,136(2), 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76(6), 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatzidakis, A., Shaw, D., & Allen, M. (2018). A psycho-social approach to consumer ethics. Journal of Consumer Culture.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518773815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherrier, H. (2007). Ethical consumption practices: Co-production of self-expression and social recognition. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review,6(5), 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherrier, H., & Murray, J. B. (2007). Reflexive dispossession and the self: Constructing a processual theory of identity. Consumption Markets & Culture,10(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherry, J., & Caldwell, J. (2013). Searching for the origins of consumer ethics: Bridging the gap between intuitive values and consumer ethical judgments. Marketing Management Journal,23(2), 117–133.Google Scholar
  15. Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research,19(2), 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chowdhury, R. M. (2017a). Emotional intelligence and consumer ethics: The mediating role of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics,142(3), 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chowdhury, R. M. (2017b). The moral foundations of consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3676-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chowdhury, R. M., & Fernando, M. (2014). The relationships of empathy, moral identity and cynicism with consumers’ ethical beliefs: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics,124(4), 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). The science of persuasion. Scientific American,284(2), 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture,8(1), 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner's.Google Scholar
  22. Dahl, D. (2013). Social influence and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research,40(2), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review,32(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis, J. L., & Rusbult, C. E. (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dedeke, A. (2015). A cognitive–intuitionist model of moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics,126(3), 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenberg, N., Shea, C. L., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. P. (2014). Empathy-related responding and cognition: A “chicken and the egg” dilemma. Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development,2, 63–88.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology,59, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrell, O., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing,49, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forbes. (2017). Millennials driving brands to practice socially responsible marketing. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahlandrum/2017/03/17/millennials-driving-brands-to-practice-socially-responsible-marketing/#4e6e8a5a4990.
  30. Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics,31(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goenka, S., & van Osselaer, S. M. (2019). Charities can increase the effectiveness of donation appeals by using a morally congruent positive emotion. Journal of Consumer Research.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science,293(5537), 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haidt, J. (2000). The positive emotion of elevation. Prev. Treat. 3. Article 3. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume3/pre0030003c.html.
  34. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review,108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Haidt, J. (2005). Invisible fences of the moral domain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,28(4), 552–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. He, Y., Zhang, J., Zhou, Y., & Yang, Z. (2019). “Monkey see, monkey do?”: The effect of construal level on consumers’ reactions to others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing,6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology,60, 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Islam, G. (2019). Psychology and business ethics: A multi-level research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04107-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review,16(2), 366–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist,58(9), 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, J. E., & Johnson, K. K. (2013). The impact of moral emotions on cause-related marketing campaigns: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics,112(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kulesza, W., Szypowska, Z., Jarman, M. S., & Dolinski, D. (2014). Attractive chameleons sell: The mimicry-attractiveness link. Psychology & Marketing,31(7), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. New Directions in Attribution Research,2(1), 35–58.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, L., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2009). In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research,36(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2009). I’ll have what she’s having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research,36(6), 915–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller, F. M., & Laczniak, G. R. (2011). The ethics of celebrity–athlete endorsement: What happens when a star steps out of bounds? Journal of Advertising Research,51(3), 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research,24(4), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nielsen. (2015). The sustainability imperative: New insights on consumer expectations. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from https://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/dk/docs/global-sustainability-report-oct-2015.pdf.
  54. Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics,109(3), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Salazar, H. A., Oerlemans, L., & van Stroe-Biezen, S. (2013). Social influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioural experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies,37(2), 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1989). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,9(3), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics,139(4), 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sekerka, L. E., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review,16(2), 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain,132(3), 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shaw, D., & Clarke, I. (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: An exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,17(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: An exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing,40(9/10), 1049–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaw, D., Carrington, M., & Chatzidakis, A. (2016a). Ethics and morality in consumption: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 8). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw, D., McMaster, R., & Newholm, T. (2016b). Care and commitment in ethical consumption: An exploration of the ‘attitude–behaviour gap’. Journal of Business Ethics,136(2), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record,56(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research,10(3), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review,32(4), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007a). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology,58, 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007b). What’s moral about the self-conscious emotions. In J. Tracey, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 21–37). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tanner, R. J., Ferraro, R., Chartrand, T. L., Bettman, J. R., & Baaren, R. V. (2008). Of chameleons and consumption: The impact of mimicry on choice and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research,34(6), 754–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior. Psychological Science,15(1), 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics,43(1–2), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics,10(5), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vitell, S. J., King, R. A., & Singh, J. J. (2013). A special emphasis and look at the emotional side of ethical decision-making. AMS Review,3(2), 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yacout, O. M., & Vitell, S. (2018). Ethical consumer decision-making: The role of need for cognition and affective responses. Business Ethics: A European Review,27(2), 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist,35(2), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zollo, L., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017a). Reciprocity and gift-giving logic in NPOs. Journal of Managerial Psychology,32(7), 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zollo, L., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017b). What sparks ethical decision making? The interplay between moral intuition and moral reasoning: Lessons from the scholastic doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics,145(4), 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zollo, L., Yoon, S., Rialti, R., & Ciappei, C. (2018). Ethical consumption and consumers’ decision making: The role of moral intuition. Management Decision,56(3), 692–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sciences for Economics and BusinessUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations