Virtue Ethics Between East and West in Consumer Research: Review, Synthesis and Directions for Future Research
This literature review systematically synthesizes studies that link consumer research to differences and similarities in virtue ethics between the East and the West, with a focus on early Chinese and ancient Greek virtue ethics. These two major traditions provide principles that guide consumer behavior and thus serve as a background to comparatively explain and evaluate the ethical nature of consumer behavior in the East and the West. The paper first covers Eastern and Western theoretical and normative approaches of virtue ethics in the field of consumer research. The subsequent systematic literature review then synthesizes empirical works in this field. Since only a few papers adopt a cross-cultural consumer research perspective, one of the main aims of this review is to encourage scholars to pursue both theoretical and empirical cross-cultural consumer research on virtue ethics. To this end, the paper closes by suggesting some fruitful directions for future research to stimulate this relatively under-researched area.
KeywordsAncient Greek virtue ethics Cross-cultural consumer research Early Chinese philosophy East and West Literature review Virtue ethics
The authors thank James Konow and Angelika Messner for their constructive and insightful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The authors also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks. All those comments helped to improve the manuscript significantly.
This research has been carried out within the framework of KCG research projects. KCG is an initiative of University of Kiel and Kiel Institute for the World Economy and is funded by the Leibniz Association (Project Number: SAS-2016-IfW-LWC) and the State government of Schleswig–Holstein.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bartlett, R. C., & Collins, S. D. (2011). Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics, translated, with an interpretive essay, notes and glossary. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Brinkmann, J., & Peattie, K. (2008). Consumer ethics research: Reframing the debate about consumption for goods. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, 13(1), 22–31.Google Scholar
- Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From paper to the internet. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Holbrook, M. B. (1994). Ethics in consumer research: An overview and prospectus. In C. T. Allen & D. R. John (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 21, pp. 566–571). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
- Holzmüller, H. H., Singh, J., & Nijssen, E. J. (2002). Multicentric cross national research: A typology and illustration. In Marketing-Arbeitspapiere, Arbeitsbericht Nr.6. Dortmund: Universität Dortmund.Google Scholar
- Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Oxford: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
- Kwong, K. K., Tang, F., & Xie, T. (2016). Is the concept of junzi measurable? A consumer perspective of virtue ethics in China. Paper presented at the 6th World Business Ethics Forum, 11–13 December, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
- MacKinnon, B., & Fiala, A. (2014). Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
- McCann, D. P. (2010). Business ethics in the perspectives of Christian social teaching and Confucian moral philosophy: Two ships passing in the night. Journal of International Business Ethics, 3(2), 16–28.Google Scholar
- Mick, D. G., Pettigrew, S., Pechmann, C. C., & Ozanne, J. L. (Eds.). (2012). Transformative consumer research for personal and collective well-being. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Provis, C. (2016). Confucianism, virtue, and wisdom. In A. J. G. Sison (Ed.), Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Rackham, H. (1944). Aristotle’s politics. Aristotle in 23 Volumes (Vol. 21) (H. Rackham, Trans). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
- Sassatelli, R. (2006). Virtue, responsibility and consumer choice: Framing critical consumerism. In F. Trentmann & J. Brewer (Eds.), Consuming cultures, global perspectives (pp. 219–250). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, D. T. (2017). Consuming choices: Ethics in a global consumer age. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Solomon, R. C. (1999). A better way to think about business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sun, G., Chen, J., D’Alessandro, S., & Winzar, H. (2011). The two different effects of Chinese traditional culture on luxury consumption: Face and harmony. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 362–369.Google Scholar
- Thompson, M. (2010). Signals of virtue in Chinese consumerism and business. Journal of International Business Ethics, 3(2), 71–79.Google Scholar