Contentious Dynamics Within the Social Turbulence of Environmental (In)justice Surrounding Wind Energy Farms in Oaxaca, Mexico

  • Jacobo RamirezEmail author
Original Paper


Businesses and governments in postcolonial countries frame investments in wind energy as efforts to address climate change and sustainable development. However, when wind energy projects encroach on indigenous peoples’ lives and land, there is often a lack of recognition and participation of these peoples and an unequal distribution of cost and benefits of such projects toward them, which leads to opposition against wind energy projects and often triggers conflicts for justice. Worryingly, such conditions have repeatedly resulted in the assassination of human rights defenders, which further inflames the conflict. Herein, I discuss these concepts based on a longitudinal study centered on a wind energy project in Oaxaca, Mexico, with the aim of exploring and understanding the conditions under which wind energy investments fail to respect current laws and norms, as well as the consequences of such negligence. My in-depth analysis of the actions of the government, businesses, and indigenous peoples revealed a phenomenon that is less discussed in environmental (in)justice research: the gradual and continuous transformation of indigenous peoples’ norms and behaviors away from their traditional economic and cultural livelihoods. This phenomenon helps to extend the conceptual understanding of environmental (in)justice with regard to social turbulence, which is defined as the unpredictable behavior of political and social systems in contexts in which existing laws, regulations, and norms regarding environmental justice are not observed. The concept of social turbulence of environmental (in)justice helps to explain how indigenous peoples sacrifice their territories, norms, and traditions to a technical solution to climate change and sustainable development.


Environmental (in)justice Indigenous peoples Wind energy Mexico 



I appreciate the constructive guidance and encouragement provided by Sara Louise Muhr, Section Editor: Critical Studies and Business Ethics as well as three reviewers. I thank María Andrea Nardi, Ana María Munar, Kai Hockerts, and the Members of the Centre for Business and Development Studies (CBDS) at Copenhagen Business School (CBS) for their helpful comments on a previous paper draft. This article is dedicated to the Zapotecas, Ikoots, and other indigenous peoples around the world who continue to sacrifice their lives for the protection and sustainable development of Mother Earth.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Altamirano-Jiménez, I. (2017). “The sea is our bread”: Interrupting green neoliberalism in Mexico. Marine Policy, 80, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asociación Mexicana de Energía Eólica, AMDEE [Mexican Wind Energy Association]. (2019). Mapas Eólicos [Wind maps]. Retrieved March 6, 2019, from
  3. Avila, S. (2018). Environmental justice and the expanding geography of wind power conflicts. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avila-Calero, S. (2017). Contesting energy transitions: Wind power and conflicts in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 992–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blog SIPAZ. (2013). Oaxaca: Fallece Por Heridas de Bala Opositor a Proyecto Eólico de la Multinacional Gas Natural Fenosa. Retrieved December 22, 2017, from
  6. Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. (2018). México: Suprema Corte Niega Amparo a Comunidades y da Luz Verde a Proyecto de Eólica del Sur [Mexico: Supreme Court denies protection to communities and gives green light to Eólica del Sur Project]. Retrieved March 3, 2019,éxico-suprema-corte-niega-amparo-a-comunidades-y-da-luz-verde-a-proyecto-de-eólica-del-sur.
  7. Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cámara de Diputados and Congreso de la Unión. (2011). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Retrieved November 11, 2011, from
  9. Campbell, H., Binford, L., Bartolomé, M., & Barabas, A. (1993). Zapotec struggles—Histories, politics, and representations from Juchitán, Oaxaca. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, H., & Green, S. (1996). A history of representations of Isthmus Zapotec women. Identities, 3(1–2), 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Del Bene, D., Scheidel, A., & Temper, L. (2018). More dams, more violence? A global analysis on resistances and repression around conflictive dams through co-produced knowledge. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. del Razo, C. (2016). A snapshot of the Mexican clean energy obligations system. Mexican Law Review, 9(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DR. (2019, 28 February). Radio program orientering. P1, Denmark. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from
  14. Dunlap, A. (2017a). A bureaucratic trap: Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) and wind energy development in Juchitán, Mexico. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 29(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
  15. Dunlap, A. (2017b). Wind energy: Toward a “sustainable violence” in Oaxaca. NACLA Report on the Americas, 49(4), 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunlap, A. (2018a). Insurrection for land, sea and dignity: Resistance and autonomy against wind energy in Álvaro Obregón, Mexico. Journal of Political Ecology, 25(1), 120–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunlap, A. (2018b). The ‘solution’ is now the ‘problem’: Wind energy, colonisation and the ‘genocide-ecocide nexus’ in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(4), 550–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlap, A. (2018c). Counterinsurgency for wind energy: The Bíi Hioxo Wind Park in Juchitán, Mexico. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(3), 630–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunlap, A., & Fairhead, J. (2014). The militarisation and marketisation of nature: An alternative lens to ‘climate-conflict’. Geopolitics, 19(4), 937–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott, D. L., Schwartz, M., Scott, G., Haymes, S., Heimiller, D., & George, R. (2004). Atlas de recursos eólicos del estado de Oaxaca [The Spanish version of wind energy resource atlas of Oaxaca]. Oak Ridge, CA: Laboratorio Nacional de Energía Renovable.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Environmental Justice/Environmental Racism. (1991). First national people of color environmental leadership. 17 Principles of environmental justice. Washington, DC: Environmental Justice/Environmental Racism. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from
  22. Escobar, A. (1996). Construction nature: Elements for a post-structuralist political ecology. Futures, 28(4), 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. FEMSA. (2011). FEMSA y MMIF Adquieren Proyecto de Energía Eólica de 396 Megawatts. Retrieved November 11, 2013, from
  24. FEMSA. (2017). Coca-Cola. FEMSA. Retrieved December 20, 2017, from
  25. Gellert, P. K., & Lynch, B. D. (2003). Mega-projects as displacements. International Social Science Journal, 55(175), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gobierno Federal. (2012). Prospectiva de Energía Renovables 2012–2026 [Prospective of renewable energy 2012–2026]. Ciudad de México: Gobierno Federal. Retrieved March 4, 2019, from
  27. Gómez, L. B. (2009). El Mercado de la Energía Eólica en México’ [The wind-energy market in Mexico]. Oficina Económica y Comercial de la Embajada de España en Monterrey [Economic and Commercial Office of the Embassy of Spain in Monterrey], México.Google Scholar
  28. Gonzalez, J. A., & Pérez-Floriano, L. R. (2015). If you can’t take the heat: Cultural beliefs about questionable conduct, stigma, punishment, and withdrawal among Mexican police officers. Organization Studies, 36(5), 665–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graff, M., Carley, S., & Pirog, M. (2019). A review of the environmental policy literature from 2014 to 2017 with a closer look at the energy justice field. Policy Studies Journal, 47(S1), S17–S44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hernández, A. L., Cerami, A. D. U., Bartolo, F. R., Hernández, L. L., & Ceballos, X. R. P. (2017). Informe sobre la situación de las personas defensoras de los derechos humanos ambientales en México (2016). Ciudad de México: Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental A.C. (CEMDA).Google Scholar
  31. Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders on his Mission to Mexico. Geneva: Human Rights Council. Retrieved February 9, 2019, from
  32. INEGI. (2016). Estadísticas a Propósito del Día Internacional de los Pueblos Indígenas. Datos Nacionales. Encuesta Intercensal 2015. Aguascalientes: INEGI. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from
  33. Inter-American Development Bank, IADB. (2011a). Eolica del Sur to build biggest wind farm in Mexico with IDB support. Retrieved March 6, 2019, from
  34. Inter-American Development Bank, IADB. (2018). Renewable energy. Retrieved June 20, 2018, from
  35. Inter-American Development Bank, IADB. (2011). Inter-American Development Bank Mexico Marena Renovables Wind Power Project (me-L1107) environmental category: A environmental and social management report (ESMR). Mexico: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., & Lê, J. K. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Juárez-Hernández, S., & León, G. (2014). Energía eólica en el istmo de Tehuantepec: Desarrollo, actores y oposición social. Problemas del Desarrollo, 45(178), 139–162.Google Scholar
  38. Kaos. (2013). Fallece Opositor a Proyecto Eólico Que Fue Baleado Por Sicarios de Gas Natural Fenosa. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from
  39. Langley, A., & Klag, M. (2017). Being where? Navigating the involvement paradox in qualitative research accounts. Organizational Research Methods, 22(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  40. Lecuyer, L., White, R. M., Schmook, B., Lemay, V., & Calmé, S. (2018). The construction of feelings of justice in environmental management: An empirical study of multiple biodiversity conflicts in Calakmul, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 213, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maher, R. (2018). Squeezing psychological freedom in corporate–community engagement. Journal of Business Ethics. Scholar
  42. Maher, R. (2019). Pragmatic community resistance within new indigenous ruralities: Lessons from a failed hydropower dam in Chile. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manzo, D. (2018). La Jornada: Asesinan a Rolando Crispín López, Activista de Pueblos Indígenas, la JORNADA. Retrieved September 16, 2018, from
  44. McCauley, D., Heffron, R. J., Stephan, H., & Jenkins, K. (2013). Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets. International Energy Law Review, 32(3), 107–110.Google Scholar
  45. McGovern, M. (2012). Developers face escalating militant opposition in Oaxaca. Windpower Monthly. Retrieved October 20, 2018, from
  46. Mejorada, C. S. (1946). The Writ of Amparo. Mexican procedure to protect human rights. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 243, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Noticias del Istmo. (2019). Inauguran en el Istmo el Parque Eólico Más Grande de América Latina. Noticias Del Istmo [The largest wind farm in Latin America is inaugurated on the Isthmus. News of the Isthmus]. Retrieved 20 June, 2019, from
  48. Peluso, N. L., & Vandergeest, P. (2011). Political ecologies of war and forests: Counterinsurgencies and the making of national natures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pierpont, N. (2009). Wind turbine syndrome. A report on a natural experiment. Lowell, MA: King Printing.Google Scholar
  50. PODER. (2015). Cuarto reporte de la misión de observación sobre el proceso de consulta indígena para la implementación de un proyecto eólico en Juchitán. Oaxaca: Centro De Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
  51. Preneal. (2011). Preneal Cierra la Venta de dos Proyectos Eólicos en Oaxaca (México). Retrieved October 13, 2013, from
  52. Quintana, R. S. D. (2015). Energía Limpia o Energía Perversa: Actores Sociales y Parques Eólicos en Dinamarca y en el Istmo de Tehuantepec. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from
  53. Ramirez, J., & Vester, T. (2013). Vestas and the indigenous communities in Oaxaca, Mexico: Clean energy gets messy. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from
  54. Renewable Energy Magazine. (2012). With 396 MW order, Vestas is on the rise in Latin America. Renewable Energy Magazine Wind. Retrieved October 13, 2013, from
  55. Romero, D., Montanyà, J., & Cancela, A. (2017). Behaviour of the wind-turbines under lightning strikes including nonlinear grounding system. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 1(2), 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubin, J. W. (1994). COCEI in Juchitán: Grassroots radicalism and regional history. Journal of Latin American Studies, 26(01), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rubin, J. W. (2004). Meanings and mobilizations: A cultural politics approach to social movements and states. Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 106–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Secretaría de Energía. (2018). Infraestructura Eólica en México Creció 300 por Ciento [Wind infrastructure in Mexico grew 300 percent]: Pedro Joaquín Coldwell (PJC). Retrieved March 4, 2019, from
  60. Sikor, T., & Newell, P. (2014). Globalizing environmental justice? Geoforum, 54, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. State of Green. (2012). Vestas wins order for largest wind energy project in Latin America. Retrieved November 2, 2018, from
  62. Suprema Corte de la Nación. (2018). 10 Enero 2018, Lista Sesión Fallados, Datos Sensible. Retrieved October 18, 2018, from
  63. Terwindt, C., & Schliamann, C. (2017). Mexico’s energy: A tale of threats, intimidation, and dispossession of indigenous peoples. In H. Böll (Ed.), Tricky business: Space for civil society in natural resource struggles (pp. 46–51). Berlin: ARNOLD Group Companies.Google Scholar
  64. Toke, D., Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4), 1129–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. United Nations. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights. Implementing the United Nations Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  66. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from
  67. United Nations. (2018). International Mother Earth Day—22 April. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from
  68. Urkidi, L. (2010). A glocal environmental movement against gold mining: Pascua-Lama in Chile. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Urkidi, L., & Walter, M. (2011). Dimensions of environmental justice in anti-gold mining movements in Latin America. Geoforum, 42(6), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vestas. (2019). Climate change. Retrieved March 4, 2019, from!.
  71. Walker, G., & Bulkeley, H. (2006). Geographies of environmental justice. Geoforum, 37(5), 655–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weinrub, A., & Giancatarino, A. (2015). Toward a climate justice energy platform: Democratizing our energy future. Retrieved November 18, 2018, from
  73. Zárate-Toledo, E., Patiño, R., & Fraga, J. (2019). Justice, social exclusion and indigenous opposition: A case study of wind energy development on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Energy Research and Social Science, 54, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zografos, C., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2009). The politics of landscape value: A case study of wind farm conflict in rural Catalonia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(7), 1726–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Society and Communication (MSC)Copenhagen Business School (CBS)FrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations