Mindfulness, Moral Reasoning and Responsibility: Towards Virtue in Ethical Decision-Making
Ethical decision-making is a multi-faceted phenomenon, and our understanding of ethics rests on diverse perspectives. While considering how leaders ought to act, scholars have created integrated models of moral reasoning processes that encompass diverse influences on ethical choice. With this, there has been a call to continually develop an understanding of the micro-level factors that determine moral decisions. Both rationalist, such as moral processing, and non-rationalist factors, such as virtue and humanity, shape ethical decision-making. Focusing on the role of moral judgement and moral intent in moral reasoning, this study asks what bearings a trait of mindfulness and a sense of moral responsibility may have on this process. A survey measuring mindfulness, moral responsibility and moral judgement completed by 171 respondents was used for four hypotheses on moral judgement and intent in relation to moral responsibility and mindfulness. The results indicate that mindfulness predict moral responsibility but not moral judgement. Moral responsibility does not predict moral judgement, but moral judgement predicts moral intent. The findings give further insight into the outcomes of mindfulness and expand insights into the models of ethical decision-making. We offer suggestions for further research on the role of mindfulness and moral responsibility in ethical decision-making.
KeywordsMoral reasoning Mindfulness Moral responsibility
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Cherise Small and Charlene Lew declares that they have no conflict of interest in submitting this paper to the Journal of Business Ethics.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Brees, J., & Martinko, M. J. (2015). Judgements of responsibility versus accountability. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1(11), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Fernandez-Duque, D., & Schwartz, B. (2016). Common sense beliefs about the central self, moral character, and the brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Fischer, D., Stanszus, L., Geiger, S., Grossman, P., & Schrader, U. (2017). Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review of research approaches and findings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 2544–2558.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Khar, B., Praveen, M., & Aggarwal, M. (2011). A quasi experimental study on leadership effectiveness and ethics. Review of Management, 1(2), 107–115.Google Scholar
- Kreplin, U., Farias, M., & Brazil, I. A. (2018). The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 8(2403), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Lampe, M., & Engleman-Lampe, C. (2012). Mindfulness-based business ethics education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16(3), 99–111.Google Scholar
- Miller, W., Becker, D. A., & Pernsteiner, A. (2014). The accounting ethics course reconsidered. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 11, 77–98.Google Scholar
- Moore, C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2013). “Just think about it”? Cognitive complexity and moral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, N., Basuray, M., Smith, W., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) Multidimensional Ethics Scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Siegel, D. S. (2015). Responsible leadership. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3015(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
- Tiwari, S., & Garg, P. (2017). Psychological need satisfaction at workplace: The role of mindfulness. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 6(3), 40–46.Google Scholar
- Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar