Advertisement

Unable to Resist the Temptation to Tell the Truth or to Lie for the Organization? Identification Makes the Difference

  • Carolin BaurEmail author
  • Roman Soucek
  • Ulrich Kühnen
  • Roy F. Baumeister
Original Paper

Abstract

Previous research indicates that the depletion of self-regulatory resources can promote unethical behavior that benefits the self. Extending this literature, we focus on norm-transgressing behavior that is intended to primarily benefit others. In particular, we predicted a differing effect of self-regulatory resource depletion on dishonesty that benefits one’s group, depending on the degree of identification with the group. Following a dual process approach, we argue that if identification with the group is strong, then people may have an automatic inclination to benefit their group even perhaps by lying. In contrast, if identification with the group is weak, then the default, uncontrolled impulse may be to tell the truth. Accordingly, identification with the social group should interact with self-regulatory resource depletion in predicting group-benefiting dishonesty. Focusing on pro-organizational dishonesty, we tested our hypotheses in one field study with 1269 employees and in one experimental study with 71 university students. As predicted, the results revealed a highly significant interaction of organizational identification and self-control strength: Depletion of self-regulatory resources increased the level of pro-organizational dishonesty among those who identify highly with the organization, but decreased the level of such behavior among those who identify less.

Keywords

Self-regulatory resources Organizational identification Pro-organizational dishonesty Self-control Unethical behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to Guido Möllering, Franziska Deutsch, and Karina J. Lloyd for helpful discussions and comments on conception and design.

Funding

This research was partially funded by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to the Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences (BIGSSS) [Grant Number: GSC 263]. The DFG had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 94–107.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25, 13–17.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aquino, K., & Reed, A., II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariely, D. (2013). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone—Especially ourselves (1st ed.). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E. (2016). Distinguished scholar invited essay: Exploring identity and identification in organizations: Time for some course corrections. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23, 361–373.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816667897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008a). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008b). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325–374.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Avanzi, L., van Dick, R., Fraccaroli, F., & Sarchielli, G. (2012). The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, workaholism and well-being. Work & Stress, 26(3), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barkan, S. E. (2012). Criminology: A sociological understanding (5th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Barnes, C. M., Schaubroeck, J., Huth, M., & Ghumman, S. (2011). Lack of sleep and unethical conduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 169–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18(2), 130–150.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2018). The strength model of self-regulation: Conclusions from the second decade of willpower research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 141–145.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617716946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115–128.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 67–127). Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Shalvi, S. (2015). Deliberate honesty. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bertrams, A., Unger, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2011). Momentan verfügbare Selbstkontrollkraft: Vorstellung eines Messinstruments und erste Befunde aus pädagogisch-psychologischen Kontexten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Blader, S. L., Patil, S., & Packer, D. J. (2017). Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 19–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Büssing, A., & Glaser, J. (1998). Managerial stress und burnout: A collaborative international study (CISMS). Die deutsche Untersuchung [Managerial stress and burnout. The German study] (Bericht Nr. 44 aus dem Lehrstuhl für Psychologie). München: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
  27. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cantarero, K., & van Tilburg, W. A. P. (2014). Too tired to taint the truth: Ego-depletion reduces other-benefiting dishonesty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 743–747.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 3–12). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Castille, C. M., Buckner, J. E., & Thoroughgood, C. N. (2016). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Sheldon, O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1082–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2011). Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance: A self-regulatory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 913–934.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chugh, D., & Kern, M. C. (2016). A dynamic and cyclical model of bounded ethicality. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Conrads, J. (2014). The effect of communication channels on lying. Working paper No. 05-06, Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences. http://www.cgs.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/cgs/pdf/working_paper/cgswp_05-06.pdf
  37. Conroy, S., Henle, C. A., Shore, L., & Stelman, S. (2017). Where there is light, there is dark: A review of the detrimental outcomes of high organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 184–203.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. De Cremer, D., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2017). Managing unethical behavior in organizations: The need for a behavioral business ethics approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(03), 437–455.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374–391.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dewall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., & Gailliot, M. T. (2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 62–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(5), 410–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R. M., & Parks, J. M. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations. Building theory through conversations (pp. 245–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Ellemers, N. (2012). The group self. Science, 336(6083), 848–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ent, M. R., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2015). Trait self-control and the avoidance of temptation. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 12–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ewing, J., & Boudette, N. E. (2017, March 10). As VW pleads guilty in U.S. over diesel scandal, trouble looms in Europe. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/volkswagen-europe-diesel-car-owners.html
  50. Feldman, Y. (2018). The law of good people: Challenging states’ ability to regulate human behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Galvin, B. M., Lange, D., & Ashforth, B. E. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40, 163–181.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gawronski, B., & Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual-process theories. In D. A. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 282–312). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Gino, F. (2015). Understanding ordinary unethical behavior: Why people who value morality act immorally. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 107–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 191–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. The Academy of Management Annals, 4, 53–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hackel, L. M., Zaki, J., & van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Social identity shapes social valuation: Evidence from prosocial behavior and vicarious reward. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(8), 1219–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A. R., et al. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546–573.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Haslam, S. (2012). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  64. Haslam, S. A. (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005). Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies and contributions. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 39–118). Chichester: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0470029307.ch2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization, and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organisational outcomes. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hendriks, A. (2012). SoPHIE—Software Platform for Human Interaction Experiments. Working Paper. University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
  69. Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. (2016). Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 16–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., Müller, J., & Strack, F. (2011). Zwei Seelen wohnen, ach, in meiner Brust. Psychologische und philosophische Erkenntnisse zum Konflikt zwischen Impuls und Selbstkontrolle. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162–176.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hofmann, W., Meindl, P., Mooijman, M., & Graham, J. (2018). Morality and self-control: How they are intertwined and where they differ. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 286–291.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418759317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219–236.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Johnson, R. D., & Downing, L. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1532–1538.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2013). Being “in control” may make you lose control: The role of self-regulation in unethical leadership behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Joosten, A., Van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  79. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kluver, J., Frazier, R., & Haidt, J. (2014). Behavioral ethics for Homo economicus, Homo heuristicus, and Homo duplex. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 150–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25, 95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613498099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Krishna, A., & Strack, F. (2017). Reflection and impulse as determinants of human behavior. In P. Meusburger, B. Werlen, & L. Suarsana (Eds.), Knowledge and action. Knowledge and space (Vol. 9). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Larson, E., & Cronin Fisk, M. (2016). GM can’t avoid up to $10 Billion in switch suits, court says. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-13/gm-lawsuits-over-ignition-switches-used-cars-revived-by-court
  84. Leavitt, K., & Sluss, D. M. (2015). Lying for who we are: An identity-based model of workplace dishonesty. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 587–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2017). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2), 267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Leiner, D. J. (2013). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Post hoc identification of meaningless data in internet surveys. SSRN Electronic Journal.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2361661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Leiner, D. J. (2016). Our research’s breadth lives on convenience samples: A case study of the online respondent pool “SoSci Panel”. Studies in Communication Media, 5, 367–396.  https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2016-4-367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Loschelder, D. D., & Friese, M. (2016). Moderators of the ego depletion effect. In E. R. Hirt, J. J. Clarkson, & L. Jia (Eds.), Self-regulation and ego control (pp. 21–42). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801850-7.00002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lu, J. G., Zhang, T., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). On the distinction between unethical and selfish behavior. In K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology. Mapping good and evil in the mind (pp. 465–474). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  90. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 102–111.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., & Ariely, D. (2009). Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 594–597.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Merz, C., & Tanner, C. (2009). Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von “Geschützen Werten” (KSPZ-Forschungsbericht Nr. 02): Zürich: Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
  97. Muraven, M., Pogarsky, G., & Shmueli, D. (2006). Self-control depletion and the general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 263–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9011-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Murphy, K. R., & Russell, C. J. (2017). Mend it or end it: Redirecting the search for interactions in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods., 20(4), 549–573.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115625322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Nussinson, R., Häfner, M., Seibt, B., Strack, F., & Trope, Y. (2012). Approach/avoidance orientations affect self-construal and identification with in-group. Self and Identity, 11(2), 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Packer, D. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2015). The dynamic nature of identity: From the brain to behavior. In N. Branscombe & K. Reynolds (Eds.), The Psychology of change: Life contexts, experiences, and identities. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  101. Pennino, C. M. (2002). Does tenure impact upon the principled reasoning of managers? Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020562028121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. C. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010744927551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pocheptsova, A., Amir, O., Dhar, R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Deciding without resources: Resource depletion and choice in context. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pohlmann, M., Bitsch, K., & Klinkhammer, J. (2016). Personal gain or organizational benefits? How to explain active corruption. German Law Journal, 17, 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57–75.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). People use self-control to risk personal harm: An intra-interpersonal dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 267–289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310381084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Reinders Folmer, C. P., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Bad for me or bad for us? Interpersonal orientations and the impact of losses on unethical behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 760–771.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211436252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 737–748.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Riketta, M., van Dick, R., & Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Employee attachment in the short and long run. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 5(3), 85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6391.5.3.85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ruddick, G., & Farrell, S. (2015). VW scandal: Staff suspended as car giant appoints new CEO. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/25/volkswagen-appoints-matthias-muller-chief-executive-porsche-vw
  114. Sardžoska, E. G., & Tang, T. L.-P. (2015). Monetary intelligence: Money attitudes—Unethical intentions, intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, and coping strategies across public and private sectors in Macedonia. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 93–115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2197-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Schminke, M. (2001). Considering the business in business ethics: An exploratory study of the influence of organizational size and structure on individual ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 375–390.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010793308837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23(10), 1264–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Shieh, G. (2009). Detecting interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous variables power and sample size considerations. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 510–528.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108320370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2014). The reflective–impulsive model. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 92–104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  121. Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), 428–453.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  123. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  124. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 98–113.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Thorsteinson, T. J. (2003). Job attitudes of part-time vs. full-time workers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 151–177.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903765913687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22, 621–640.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 769–780.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Vadera, A. K., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). Love, hate, ambivalence, or indifference? A conceptual examination of workplace crimes and organizational identification. Organization Science, 24, 172–188.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. van Knippenberg, B., Martin, L., & Tyler, T. (2006). Process-orientation versus outcome-orientation during organizational change: The role of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. van Lange, P. A. M., de Bruin, E. M. N., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Verschuere, B., & Shalvi, S. (2014). The truth comes naturally! Does it? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Vlasic, B. (2015, May 11). G.M.’s ignition switch death toll hits 100. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/12/business/gms-ignition-switch-death-toll-hits-100.html.
  135. Vohs, K. D. (2006). Self-regulatory resources power the reflective system: Evidence from five domains. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 883–898.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Vohs, K. D., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11(3), 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Vonasch, A. J., Vohs, K. D., Pocheptsova Ghosh, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2017). Ego depletion induces mental passivity: Behavioral effects beyond impulse control. Motivation Science, 3(4), 321–336.  https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Weaver, G. R., & Clark, C. E. (2015). Behavioral ethics, behavioral governance, and corruption in and by organizations. In P. Hardi, P. Heywood, & D. Torsello (Eds.), Debates of corruption and integrity (pp. 135–158). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  142. Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wiltermuth, S. S. (2011). Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Yam, K. C., Chen, X.-P., & Reynolds, S. J. (2014). Ego depletion and its paradoxical effects on ethical decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zhong, B.-J., Gong, Y., & Shenkar, O. (2014). Too much of a good thing: The role of organizational identification on organizational performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 16440.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.16440abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolin Baur
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roman Soucek
    • 2
  • Ulrich Kühnen
    • 3
  • Roy F. Baumeister
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences (BIGSSS)University of Bremen and Jacobs University BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.School of Business, Economics and SocietyFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NürnbergNurembergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Psychology and MethodsJacobs University BremenBremenGermany
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  5. 5.School of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations