Unable to Resist the Temptation to Tell the Truth or to Lie for the Organization? Identification Makes the Difference
Previous research indicates that the depletion of self-regulatory resources can promote unethical behavior that benefits the self. Extending this literature, we focus on norm-transgressing behavior that is intended to primarily benefit others. In particular, we predicted a differing effect of self-regulatory resource depletion on dishonesty that benefits one’s group, depending on the degree of identification with the group. Following a dual process approach, we argue that if identification with the group is strong, then people may have an automatic inclination to benefit their group even perhaps by lying. In contrast, if identification with the group is weak, then the default, uncontrolled impulse may be to tell the truth. Accordingly, identification with the social group should interact with self-regulatory resource depletion in predicting group-benefiting dishonesty. Focusing on pro-organizational dishonesty, we tested our hypotheses in one field study with 1269 employees and in one experimental study with 71 university students. As predicted, the results revealed a highly significant interaction of organizational identification and self-control strength: Depletion of self-regulatory resources increased the level of pro-organizational dishonesty among those who identify highly with the organization, but decreased the level of such behavior among those who identify less.
KeywordsSelf-regulatory resources Organizational identification Pro-organizational dishonesty Self-control Unethical behavior
Special thanks go to Guido Möllering, Franziska Deutsch, and Karina J. Lloyd for helpful discussions and comments on conception and design.
This research was partially funded by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to the Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences (BIGSSS) [Grant Number: GSC 263]. The DFG had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ariely, D. (2013). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone—Especially ourselves (1st ed.). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
- Barkan, S. E. (2012). Criminology: A sociological understanding (5th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 67–127). Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bertrams, A., Unger, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2011). Momentan verfügbare Selbstkontrollkraft: Vorstellung eines Messinstruments und erste Befunde aus pädagogisch-psychologischen Kontexten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Büssing, A., & Glaser, J. (1998). Managerial stress und burnout: A collaborative international study (CISMS). Die deutsche Untersuchung [Managerial stress and burnout. The German study] (Bericht Nr. 44 aus dem Lehrstuhl für Psychologie). München: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 3–12). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Castille, C. M., Buckner, J. E., & Thoroughgood, C. N. (2016). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Conrads, J. (2014). The effect of communication channels on lying. Working paper No. 05-06, Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences. http://www.cgs.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/cgs/pdf/working_paper/cgswp_05-06.pdf
- Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R. M., & Parks, J. M. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations. Building theory through conversations (pp. 245–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ewing, J., & Boudette, N. E. (2017, March 10). As VW pleads guilty in U.S. over diesel scandal, trouble looms in Europe. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/volkswagen-europe-diesel-car-owners.html
- Gawronski, B., & Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual-process theories. In D. A. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 282–312). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Haslam, S. (2012). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005). Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies and contributions. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 39–118). Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470029307.ch2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks, A. (2012). SoPHIE—Software Platform for Human Interaction Experiments. Working Paper. University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
- Joosten, A., Van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Feel good, do-good!? On consistency and compensation in moral self-regulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
- Krishna, A., & Strack, F. (2017). Reflection and impulse as determinants of human behavior. In P. Meusburger, B. Werlen, & L. Suarsana (Eds.), Knowledge and action. Knowledge and space (Vol. 9). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Larson, E., & Cronin Fisk, M. (2016). GM can’t avoid up to $10 Billion in switch suits, court says. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-13/gm-lawsuits-over-ignition-switches-used-cars-revived-by-court
- Loschelder, D. D., & Friese, M. (2016). Moderators of the ego depletion effect. In E. R. Hirt, J. J. Clarkson, & L. Jia (Eds.), Self-regulation and ego control (pp. 21–42). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801850-7.00002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, J. G., Zhang, T., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). On the distinction between unethical and selfish behavior. In K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology. Mapping good and evil in the mind (pp. 465–474). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Merz, C., & Tanner, C. (2009). Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von “Geschützen Werten” (KSPZ-Forschungsbericht Nr. 02): Zürich: Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
- Packer, D. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2015). The dynamic nature of identity: From the brain to behavior. In N. Branscombe & K. Reynolds (Eds.), The Psychology of change: Life contexts, experiences, and identities. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Pauly, C. (2010). Rogue trader Jerome Kerviel. Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/rogue-trader-jerome-kerviel-i-was-merely-a-small-cog-in-the-machine-a-729155.html
- Ruddick, G., & Farrell, S. (2015). VW scandal: Staff suspended as car giant appoints new CEO. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/25/volkswagen-appoints-matthias-muller-chief-executive-porsche-vw
- Sardžoska, E. G., & Tang, T. L.-P. (2015). Monetary intelligence: Money attitudes—Unethical intentions, intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction, and coping strategies across public and private sectors in Macedonia. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2197-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2014). The reflective–impulsive model. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 92–104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
- Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vlasic, B. (2015, May 11). G.M.’s ignition switch death toll hits 100. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/12/business/gms-ignition-switch-death-toll-hits-100.html.
- Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weaver, G. R., & Clark, C. E. (2015). Behavioral ethics, behavioral governance, and corruption in and by organizations. In P. Hardi, P. Heywood, & D. Torsello (Eds.), Debates of corruption and integrity (pp. 135–158). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar