How Do Power and Status Differ in Predicting Unethical Decisions? A Cross-National Comparison of China and Canada
This study examines the varying roles of power, status, and national culture in unethical decision-making. Most research on unethical behavior in organizations is grounded in Western societies; empirical comparative studies of the antecedents of unethical behavior across nations are rare. The authors conduct this comparative study using scenario studies with four conditions (high power vs. low power × high status vs. low status) in both China and Canada. The results demonstrate that power is positively related to unethical decision-making in both countries. Status has a positive effect on unethical decision-making and facilitates the unethical decisions of Canadian participants who have high power but not Chinese participants who have high power. To explicate participants’ unethical decision-making rationales, the authors ask participants to justify their unethical decisions; the results reveal that Chinese participants are more likely to cite position differences, whereas Canadian participants are more likely to cite work effort and personal abilities. These findings expand theoretical research on the relationship between social hierarchy and unethical decision-making and provide practical insights on unethical behavior in organizations.
KeywordsUnethical decisions Power Status Power approach theory Status characteristics theory Culture China Canada Power distance Individualism Leadership
This work was in part supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 71472131, 71732005, 71271219, 71771219, 71602080, 71790615), and by Central South University (2015zzts009).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
We certify that all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approvals have been obtained from the Human Participants Review Sub-Committee.
We further certify that informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
- Alexandra, V., Torres, M. M., Kovbasyuk, O., Addo, T. B., & Ferreira, M. C. (2017). The relationship between social cynicism belief, social dominance orientation, and the perception of unethical behavior: A cross-cultural examination in Russia, Portugal, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(3), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1(1), 67–97.Google Scholar
- Anicich, E. M., Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). When the bases of social hierarchy collide: Power without status drives interpersonal conflict. Organization Science, 27(1), 123–140.Google Scholar
- Arnold, D. F., Bernardi, R. A., Neidermeyer, P. E., & Schmee, J. (2007). The effect of country and culture on perceptions of appropriate ethical actions prescribed by codes of conduct: A western European perspective among accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 71–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge: Winthrop.Google Scholar
- Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross cultural psychology (pp. 398–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2006). Social psychology of culture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. R., Pant, L., & Sharp, D. (1995). An exploratory examination of international differences in auditors’ ethical perceptions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 7(1), 37–64.Google Scholar
- Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
- Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Fontaine, R. G., Barbaranelli, C., & Farnese, M. L. (2015). An integrative approach to understanding counterproductive work behavior: The roles of stressors, negative emotions, and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 678–692). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kafashan, S., Sparks, A., Griskevicius, V., & Barclay, P. (2014). Prosocial behavior and social status. In J. Cheng, J. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 139–158). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington-Halsted-Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Furrer, O., Kuo, M. H., Li, Y., Wangenheim, F., et al. (2014). Societal-level versus individual-level predictions of ethical behavior: A 48-society study of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 283–306.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
- Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Behavior Analyst, 20(2), 109–119.Google Scholar
- Tan, J. (2002). Culture, nation, and entrepreneurial strategic orientations: Implications for an emerging economy. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(4), 95–111.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (2004). The many dimensions of culture. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 88–93.Google Scholar
- Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2011). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey International.Google Scholar
- Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. Information Processing and Management, 31(6), 906–907.Google Scholar
- Zhong, C. B., Magee, J., Maddux, W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, culture, and (in) action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western society. In Y. Chen (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: National culture and groups (Vol. 9, pp. 53–73). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar