Advertisement

Ethics of Tax Interpretation

  • Daniel T. OstasEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This article joins a somewhat nascent, but growing, body of scholarship addressing the ethical obligation to pay tax. The analysis is grounded to the ethical duty to obey law generally and highlights two competing orientations to statutory interpretation. The norms of self-interested advocacy suggest that tax planners should assert that interpretation that will generate the most wealth for the client. The norms of professional advising, by contrast, direct the tax planner to interpret tax law with reference to plain meaning, interpretive maxims, court precedents, and legislative purpose. When the two orientations differ, the ethical duty to obey law requires the tax planner to recommend, and for the taxpayer to follow, the latter view. Case studies drawn from a Louisiana sales tax avoidance scheme and from Google’s profit-shifting activities illustrate the ethical issues incumbent in tax interpretation.

Keywords

Tax avoidance Tax advising Legal interpretation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

The author declares that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Bar Association. (2010). Model rules of professional conduct (6th edn.). Washington, DC: ABA Press.Google Scholar
  3. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2006). The three goals of taxation. Tax Law Review, 60, 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2014). Corporate taxation and corporate social responsibility. NYU Journal of Law and Business, 11(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  5. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2017). Foreword in corporate taxation and social responsibility. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Bankman, J. (2000). The economic substance doctrine. Southern California Law Review, 74(5), 5–30.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, R., & Davis-Nozemack, K. (2018). Tax avoidance as a sustainability problem. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1009–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, H. C. (1911). Handbook on the construction and interpretation of the laws (2d edn.). Boston: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, J. (2016). Do they do evil? The moral economy of tax professionals. In D. Whyte & J. Wiegratz (Eds.), Neoliberalism and the moral economy of fraud (pp. 72–85). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, B. (2014). A utilitarian account of political obligation. Available at https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/1307.
  11. Dickerson, F. R. (1975). The interpretation and application of statutes. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  12. Dietsch, P. (2011). Asking the fox to guard the henhouse: The tax planning industry and corporate social responsibility. Ethical Perspectives, 18, 341–354.Google Scholar
  13. DiLeo, D. A. (2002). Loopholes in federal income taxation: Solutions for charitable trust abuse and potential application to corporate tax shelter abuse. Suffolk University Law Review, 36, 207–226.Google Scholar
  14. Dourado, A. P. (2015). Aggressive tax planning in the EU law and in the light of BEBS, Intertax (43), 42–57.Google Scholar
  15. Edmundson, W. A. (Ed.). (1999). The duty to obey the law: Selected philosophical readings. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, C. J., Ward, J. C., & Rockwell, C. (2018). How to drive an RV through a loophole: The ethics and legality of LLC formation for sales tax avoidance. Southern Law Journal, 28(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
  17. Gravelle, J. G. (2015). Tax havens: International tax avoidance and evasion, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.Google Scholar
  18. Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are there any natural rights? The Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilling, A., & Ostas, D. T. (2017). Corporate taxation and social responsibility. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes, T. (1991) [1651]. Leviathan, R. Tuck (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. (2017). Fortune 500 companies hold a record $2.6 trillion offshore. Available at https://itep.org/fortune-500-companies-hold-a-record-26-trillion-offshore/.
  22. Jess, S. (2015). How Montana became a tax haven, Montana Public Radio, available at http://mtpr.org/post/how-montana-became-tax-haven.
  23. Kahan, D. M. (1997). Ignorance of the law is an excuse: But only for the virtuous. Michigan Law Review, 96, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz, L. (1996). Ill-gotten gains: Evasion, blackmail, fraud, and kindred puzzles of the law. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, Y. (2008). Statutory interpretation: General principles and recent trends, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.Google Scholar
  26. Kleinbard, E. D. (2011). Stateless income. Florida Tax Review, 11, 699–773.Google Scholar
  27. Kovach, R. J. (2008). Taxes, loopholes and morals revisited: A 1963 perspective on the tax gap. Whittier Law Review, 30, 247–280.Google Scholar
  28. Levi, E. H. (1949). An introduction to legal reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Libin, J. B. (2010). Congress should address tax avoidance head-on: The internal revenue code needs a GAAR. Virginia Tax Review, 30, 339–360.Google Scholar
  30. Likhovski, A. (2004). The duke and the lady: Helvering v. Gregory and the history of tax avoidance adjudication. Cardozo Law Review, 25, 953–1018.Google Scholar
  31. Llewellyn, K. N. (1950). Remarks on the theory of appellate decision and the rules or canons about how statutes are to be construed. Vanderbilt Law Review, 3, 395–406.Google Scholar
  32. Locke, J. (1980) [1690]. Second treatise of government. In C. B. Macpherson (Ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  33. McMahon, M. J. (2000). Random thoughts on applying judicial doctrines to interpret the internal revenue code. SMU Law Review, 54, 195–208.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, A. S. (1956). Statutory language and the purposeful use of ambiguity. Virginia Law Review, 42, 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell, K. (2008). RV owners who registered in Montana convicted for tax evasion, Denver Post, May 21, 2008.Google Scholar
  36. Molero, J. C., & Pujol, F. (2012). Working inside the potential tax evader’s mind: Tax morale does matter. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Murphy, R. (2014). The tax gap: Tax evasion in 2014 and what can be done about it. Public and Commercial Services Union.Google Scholar
  38. Murphy, R. (2015). The joy of tax: How a fair system can create a better society. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
  39. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Ostas, D. T., & Hilling, A. (2016). Global tax shelters, the ethics of interpretation, and the need for a pragmatic jurisprudence. American Business Law Journal, 53(4), 745–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Partlow, J. (2013). The necessity of complexity in the tax system. Wyoming Law Review, 13, 305–334.Google Scholar
  42. Pauly, E. M. (2008). Raising penalty standard “more likely than not” creates conflict tax lawyers and their clients. Washburn Law Journal, 47, 757–787.Google Scholar
  43. Pepper, S. L. (1995). Counseling at the limits of the law: An exercise in the jurisprudence of lawyering. Yale Law Journal, 104, 1545–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Picciotto, S. (2007). Constructing compliance: Game playing, tax law, and the regulatory state. Law and Policy, 29, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plato (1956) [400 BCE]. Crito in The great dialogues of Plato, W. H. D. Rouse (trans.), New York: Mentor Book pp. 447–460.Google Scholar
  46. Prebble, Z., & Prebble, J. (2010). The morality of tax avoidance. Creighton Law Review, 43, 693–745.Google Scholar
  47. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rawls, J. (1999) [1969]. The justification of civil disobedience. In W. A. Edmundson (Ed.), In The duty to obey the law: Selected philosophical readings. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  49. Raz, J. (1984). The obligation to obey: Revision and tradition. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics & Public Policy, 1, 139–155.Google Scholar
  50. Sartorius, R. (1981). Political authority and political obligation. Virginia Law Review, 67, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scalia, A. (1997). A matter of interpretation: Federal courts and the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Shaxson, N. (2011). Treasure islands: Uncovering the damage of offshore banking and tax havens. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sophocles (1986) [442 BCE]. Antigone in the Theban E. F. Plays & Watling (trans.), New York: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  54. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017). Anarchism. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/anarchism/#PoliAnar.
  55. Symposium (2001), Business purpose, economic substance, and corporate tax shelters, 54 SMU Law Review, Vol. 54.Google Scholar
  56. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2017). Tax gap: IRS needs specific goals and strategies for improving compliance. Available at https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-39.
  57. Zucman, G. (2014). Taxing across borders: Tracking personal wealth and corporate profits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michael F. Price College of BusinessUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations