Multinational Enterprise Strategies for Addressing Sustainability: the Need for Consolidation
This paper examines the growing number of publications on multinational enterprise management of sustainability issues. Based on an integrative literature review and thematic analysis, the paper analyses and synthesises the current state of knowledge about main issues arising. Key issues identified include the following: choice of sustainability strategies; management of the views of headquarters towards sustainability; local cultural sustainability perspectives in developed and developing host countries; MNEs with home in developing/emerging countries; and resource availability for implementing sustainability initiatives. Findings indicate that although the literature is tending towards growing acceptance about sustainability and its challenges most researchers have focused on corporate social responsibility and investigate their own niche problem, industry, and country, using their own chosen theory and do not consider the need for consolidation and integration of social, environmental and economic performance. Avenues for future research are identified which will provide a means for the ethical foundations of theory and practice to be improved.
KeywordsMultinational enterprise Sustainability strategy Distance
This study was partially funded by the Management Discipline Group Research Grants Scheme, University of Technology Sydney Business School, Sydney, Australia, Grant Number 103010/0210595.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Professor Roger Burritt declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr Katherine Christ declares that she has no conflict of interest. Associate Professor Hussain Rammal has received a research Grant from his employing university, the University of Technology Sydney (Number103010/0210595), and has no conflict of interest. Professor Stefan Schaltagger declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N. E., & Rugman, A. M. (2012). The effects of institutional distance and headquarters’ financial performance on the generation of environmental standards in multinational companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Hurtado-Torres, N. E., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rugman, A. M. (2013). Differentiated effects of formal and informal institutional distance between countries on the environmental performance of multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2657–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.Google Scholar
- Hayward, R., Lee, J., Keeble, J., McNamara, R., Hall, C., & Cruse, S. (2013). The UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study on Sustainability 2013: Architects of a Better World. Retrieved January 17, 2018 from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/UNGC_Accenture_CEO_Study_2013.pdf.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly-Hills: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Hörisch, J., Burritt, R. L., Christ, K. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Legal systems, internationalization and corporate sustainability. An empirical analysis of the influence of national and international authorities. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(5), 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organisations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Husted, B. W. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45, 271–349.Google Scholar
- Kolk, A., & Levy, D. (2004). Multinationals and global climate change: issues for the automotive and oil industries. In Lundan, S. M. (Ed.), Multinationals, environment and global competition (Research in global strategic management) (pp. 171–193). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.Google Scholar
- Miska, C., Stahl, G. K., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2016). Intercultural competencies as antecedents of responsible global leadership. European Journal of International Management, 7(5), 550–569.Google Scholar
- Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263), 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2005). Corporate sustainability. In H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006. A survey of current issues (pp. 185–222). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. K., Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Miska, C. (2017). Responsible global leadership. In M. E. Mendenhall, J. S. Osland, A. Bird, G. R. Oddou & M. L. Maynevski (Eds.), Global leadership research, practice, and development (3nd Edition ed.), pp. 363–388). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar